Advertisement

Early Modern European Atheism with Chinese Characteristics: First Jesuit Descriptions of Neo-Confucianism and Their Spinozist Reception

  • Mateusz Janik
Chapter

Abstract

Janik’s chapter discusses an early-modern encounter between Spinozism and Neo-Confucian metaphysics. The chapter claims that early-modern atheism played the role of medium between these two philosophical discourses. The Jesuit sources discussed here show that the monist interpretations of Neo-Confucian philosophy and denunciation of atheism which have been attributed to Chinese authors and scholars prepared solid ground for the later linking of Chinese thought with Spinozism by such authors as Pierre Bayle or Nicolas Malebranche. Simultaneously, the interpretations of Spinozism as a doctrine analogous or similar to some of the intellectual currents encountered by the Jesuit missionaries in China served the polemical purpose of relocating Spinozism outside the corpus of European philosophical tradition.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Centre in Poland [Grant number: UMO-2019/31/D/HS1/00864].

References

  1. Bayle, Pierre. 1730. Dictionnaire Historique Et Critique, vol. 4. Amsterdam: Brunel et al.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2000. Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet. Trans. Robert Bartlett. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blue, Gregory. 2001. Xu Guangqi in the West: Early Jesuit Sources and the Construction of an Identity. In Statecraft and Intellectual Renewal in Late Ming China: The Cross-Cultural Synthesis of X u Guangxi, 19–71. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Confucius. 2007. The Analects of Confucius. Trans. Burton Watson. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. de Boyer, Jean-Baptiste. 1739. Lettres Chinoises Ou Correspondence Philosophique, Historique et Critique, 5 vols. Hague: P. Gosse.Google Scholar
  6. de Burigny, Jean Levesque. 1724. Histoire de la philosophie payenne, ou sentiments des philosophes et des peuples payens les plus célèbres sur dieu, sur l’âme et sur les devoirs de l’homme. Hague: P. Gosse et P. De Hondt.Google Scholar
  7. Gernet, Jacques. 1973. La politique de conversion de Matteo Ricci en Chine. Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 18 (36): 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Israel, Jonathan I. 2007. Admiration of China and Classical Chinese Thought in the Radical Enlightenment (1685–1740). Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies 4 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  9. Kors, Alan Charles. 2016. Atheism in France, 1650–1729: The Orthodox Sources of Disbelief. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lamy, François. 1696. Le nouvel athéisme renversé, ou réfutation du sistème de Spinoza. Paris: L. Rouland.Google Scholar
  11. Longobardi, Nicolò. 1701. Traité sur quelques points de la religion des Chinois. Paris: L. Guerin.Google Scholar
  12. Malebranche, Nicolas. 1708. Entretien d’un philosophe chrétien et d’un philosophe chinois, sur l’existence et la nature de Dieu. Paris: M. David.Google Scholar
  13. Maverick, Lewis A. 1939. A Possible Chinese Source of Spinoza’s Doctrine. Revue de Littérature Comparée 19: 417–428.Google Scholar
  14. Mungello, David E. 1989. Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ricci, Matteo. 2016. The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven. Trans. Douglas Lancashire and Peter Hu Kuo-chen. St. Louis: Institute of Jesuit Sources.Google Scholar
  16. Ricci, Matteo, and Nicolas Trigault. 1615. De christiana expeditione apud Sinas suscepta ab Societate Jesu. Ex P. Matthaei Ricii eiusdem Societatis commentarius. Augsburg: apud Christoph Mangium.Google Scholar
  17. Trigault, Nicolas, and Matteo Ricci. 1617. Histoire de l’expédition chrestienne au royaume de la Chine. Lille: P. de Rache.Google Scholar
  18. Varenius, Bernhardus. 1649. Tractatus in quo agitur. De Iaponiorum religione. De Christianae religionis introductione in ea loca. De ejusdem extirpatione. Adiuncta est de diversa diversarum gentium totius telluris religione brevis informatio. Amsterdam: L. Elzevir.Google Scholar
  19. Weststeijn, Thijs. 2007. Spinoza Sinicus: An Asian Paragraph in the History of the Radical Enlightenment. Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (4): 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mateusz Janik
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Political StudiesPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.East China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations