Digital Media Network Projects: Classroom Inclusivity Through a Symphilosophical Approach

  • Renata FuchsEmail author


This chapter looks at the process of merging literary research on the Romantic idea of symphilosophy with a pedagogical approach oriented toward classroom inclusivity that attends to the learning needs of all students regardless of their gender, age, race, disability, and sexual orientation through a peer-like environment including the instructor. The use of this core concept of the European literary tradition lends itself to a decolonialization of literature and language courses in conjunction with feminist ideas because they prioritized post-colonialism and postmodernism and brought into focus theories of intersectionality. I believe that German Romantic philosophy—with its openness to dialogue, emancipation of women, and acculturation of Jews in the Romantic salon—and its extension, the letter, are relevant to these pedagogical objectives regarding diversity and can be successfully applied in digital and social media projects. The Romantic salon can be then perceived as a decolonizing space albeit as a different type of decolonization.


Diversity Decolonization Sociability Symphilosophy German 


  1. Baird, Ileana. 2014. Social Networks in the Long Eighteenth Century: Clubs, Literary Salons, Textual Coteries. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  2. Barongo-Muweke, Norah. 2016. Decolonizing Education: Towards Reconstructing a Theory of Citizenship Education for Postcolonial Africa. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beiser, Frederick C. 2003. The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Borschke, Margie. 2014. “The New Romantics: Authenticity, Participation, and the Aesthetics of Piracy.” First Monday 19 (10). Accessed 9 August 2018.
  5. Dimock, Wai Chee. 2011. “The Changing Profession: World Literature on Facebook.” PMLA 126: 730–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feiner, Susan, and Barbara A. Morgan. 1990. “Women and Minorities in Introductory Economics Textbooks: 1974 to 1984.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 18 (3/4): 46–67.Google Scholar
  7. Feiner, Susan, and Bruce Roberts. 1995. “Using Alternative Paradigms to Teach About Race and Gender: A Critical Thinking Approach to Introductory Economics.” The American Economic Review 85 (2): 46–67.Google Scholar
  8. Forsdick, Charles. 2017. “Literature and Decolonization.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Ends of Empire, edited by Martin Thomas and Andrew Thompson, n.p. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gjesdal, Kristin. 2014. “Hermeneutics, Individuality, and Tradition. Schleiermacher’s Idea of Bildung in the Landscape of Hegelian Thought.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, edited by Dalia Nassar, 92–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Henderson, Ingeborg. 1991. “Addressing Diversity: A Call for Action.” Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 24 (1): 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jarvis, J. Ereck. 2014. “Chapter One. Green Ribband Width: The Broken Metaphors of New Social Forms, C. 1680 and C. 2013.” In Social Networks in the Long Eighteenth Century: Clubs, Literary Salons, Textual Coteries, edited by Ileana Baird, 32–53. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, Paddy. 2014. “Are Digital Artists Really the 21st Century’s New Romantics? Eyebeam Tracks the 19th-Century Themes in New Media Art.” Artnet News. April 23. Accessed 9 August 2018.
  13. Kneller, Jane. 2014. “Sociability and the Conduct of Philosophy: What We Can Learn from Early German Romanticism.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, edited by Dalia Nassar, 110–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Menninghaus, Winfried. 2000. “Beauties; and the Romantic Arabesque.” In Rereading Romanticism, edited by Martha B. Helfer, 27–46. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.Google Scholar
  15. Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. London: Verso. Google Scholar
  16. Murray, Christopher John, ed. 2014. Encyclopedia of Romantic Era, 1760–1850, II. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
  17. Ockenfuß, Solveig. 1992. Bettine von Arnims Briefroman: literarische Erinnerungsarbeit: literarische Erinnerungsarbeit zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt: Opladen.Google Scholar
  18. Rampton, Martha. 2015. “Four Waves of Feminism.” Pacific University. Accessed 23 March 2018.
  19. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1964. “Le colonialisme est un système.” In Situations V, 25–48. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  20. Shackelford, Jean. 1999. “A Means for Bringing Critical Thinking and Creativity to the Economics Classroom.” In Valuing Us All: Feminist Pedagogy and Economics, edited by April Laskey Aerni and Kim Marie Mc Goldrick, 19–29. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Strube, Rolf, ed. 1992. “Sie saßen und tranken am Teetisch” Anfänge und Blütezeit der Berliner Salons 1789–1871. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
  22. Ziolkowski, Theodore. 1990. German Romanticism and Its Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Germanic LanguagesUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations