Advertisement

Characterization of Shear Strength and Compressibility of Diesel Contaminated Sand

  • Sherif S. AbdelSalamEmail author
  • Ahmed M. M. Hasan
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

Soil contamination with petroleum products and/or waste are a problem that can be detected nearby industrial areas and other amenities that include underground leaking tanks or pipelines. The negative effect of oil contamination on the soil properties is significant and can completely alter the strength as well as the serviceability limit states of the bearing stratum. In this study, Diesel was mixed with cohesionless soils using four different mixing percentages, starting with 5% up to 13.5% by weight, to cover a wide range of contamination ratios. The effects of contamination on the soil shear strength parameters and compressibility were assessed. Furthermore, the ultrasonic test was utilized to evaluate changes in the soil stiffness due to diesel contamination. Accordingly, a correlation was developed between wave velocity and California bearing ratio using frequencies ranging from 24 to 500 kHz.

Keywords

Diesel contamination Sand Direct shear Shear strength Compressibility CBR Ultrasonic on soil 

References

  1. Abousnina, R.M., Manalo, A., Lokuge, W., Shiau, J.: Oil contaminated sand: an emerging and sustainable construction material. Procedia Eng. 118, 1119–1126 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akpabio, G.T., Udoinyang, I.E., Basil, T.S.: Effect of used motor oil contamination on geotechnical properties of clay soil on Uyo-Akwa Ibom. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 5(2), 22–30 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. Al-Sanad, H.A., Eid, W.K., Ismael, N.F.: Geotechnical properties of oil-contaminated kuwaiti sand. J. Geotech. Eng. 121(5), 407–412 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Chamuel, J.R.: Ultrasonic studies of transient seismo-acoustic waves in bounded solids and Liquid/Solid interfaces (1991)Google Scholar
  6. Chen, J., Wang, H., Yao, Y.: Experimental study of nonlinear ultrasonic behavior of soil materials during the compaction. Ultrasonics 69, 19–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estabragh, A.R., Beytolahpour, I., Moradi, M., Javadi, A.A.: Consolidation behavior of two fine-grained soils contaminated by glycerol and ethanol. Eng. Geol. 178, 102–108 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fine, P., Graber, E.R., Yaron, B.: Soil interactions with petroleum hydrocarbons: Abiotic processes. Soil Technol. 10(2), 133–153 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Izdebska-Mucha, D., Trzcińsk, J., Żbik, M.S., Frost, R.L.: Influence of hydrocarbon contamination on clay soil microstructure. Clay Miner. 46(1), 47–58 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, R.: Testing of Concrete by Ultrasonic-pulse Technique. In: Highway Research Board Proceedings, vol. 32 (1953)Google Scholar
  11. Kermani, M., Ebadi, T.: The Effect of Oil Contamination on the Geotechnical Properties of Fine-Grained Soils. Soil Sedim. Contam. Int. J. 21(5), 655–671 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khamehchiyan, M., Charkhabi, A.H., Tajik, M.: Effects of crude oil contamination on geotechnical properties of clayey and sandy soils. Eng. Geol. 89(3), 220–229 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meegoda, J.N., Chen, B., Gunasekera, S.D., Pederson, P.: Compaction characteristics of contaminated soils-reuse as a road base material. Recycled Mater. Geotech. Appl. 195–209 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. Nazir, A.K.: Effect of motor oil contamination on geotechnical properties of over consolidated clay. Alexandria Eng. J. 50(4), 331–335 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neilsen, T.B., Robin, S.M., Sean, M., Margaret, G.M., Richard, S., Greg, A.V., Ingo, S., Andrew, G.H.: Preliminary analyses of seismo-acoustic wave propagation in outdoor field-scale analog volcanic explosions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145(3), 1869 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Putri, E.E., Rao, N.S.V.K., Mannan, M.A.: Evaluation of modulus of elasticity and modulus of subgrade reaction of soils using CBR test. J. Civil Eng. Res. 2(1), 34–40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ratnaweera, P., Meegoda, J.N.: Shear strength and stress-strain behavior of contaminated soils. Geotech. Testing J. 29(2), 133–140 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Safehian, H., Rajabi, A.M., Ghasemzadeh, H.: Effect of diesel-contamination on geotechnical properties of illite soil. Eng. Geol. 241, 55–63 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shin, E.C., Braja, M.D.: Bearing capacity of unsaturated oil-contaminated sand. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 11(3), 368–373 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Vasil’eva, A.A., Zobachev, N.M., Lobanova, G.L.: The use of ultrasonics for determining soil density. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 6(2), 95–98 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil and Infrastructure Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering and Applied ScienceNile UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations