Advertisement

Behavior of Unpaved Roads Under Different Conditions

  • Adelino FerreiraEmail author
  • M. I. M. Pinto
  • Arminda Almeida
  • Natacha Rodrigues
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a laboratory study performed on unpaved roads. Both unreinforced wearing layers and layers reinforced with geosynthetics were considered for their construction and study, as geosynthetics are reported to improve the behavior of the granular layers. Reinforcement was introduced by means of a polyester geogrid. Four different types of soils were considered in the study, each one with different percentages of sand, silt and clay. The soil layers were placed, compacted and tested with the optimum water content. Traditional soil characterization was performed, which included particle size analysis, density of solid particles, consistency limits, compaction and California Bearing Ratio. Wheel Tracking tests were performed to study the unpaved road behavior in the different conditions. In the majority of the tests, a compressive material was used beneath the soil layer, to simulate the existence of a weak and deformable subgrade. The results of the study conducted to the following main conclusions: soil D, the one with the highest percentage of fines, shows the best performance under the Wheel Tracking test, for all conditions under study; soil A, the coarsest soil, performed worst; soils B and C improve their performance significantly when the geogrid reinforcement was included.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the company BBF - Tecnologias do Ambiente (Environmental Technologies) for the supply of the geogrid and to ACIV for the financial support to present this paper at the GeoMEast 2019 International Congress & Exhibition.

References

  1. ASTM 2487: Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). American Society for Testing and Materials (2009) Google Scholar
  2. ASTM 3282: Standard practice for classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes. American Society for Testing and Materials (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Calvarano, L., Leonardi, G., Palamara, R.: Finite element modelling of unpaved road reinforced with geosynthetics. Transp. Geotech. Geoecol. 189, 99–104 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. EN 12697-22: Bituminous mixtures - Test methods for hot mix asphalt - Part 22: Wheel Tracking, European Standard (2007)Google Scholar
  5. IGS: Geosynthetics in Unpaved Roads, International Geosynthetic Society (2018). www.geosyntheticssociety.org. Last accessed on July 2019
  6. Reilly, C., Nell, K.: Geosynthetic reinforcement for unpaved roads - recent experience. In: Proceedings of the Conference: Civil Engineering Research in Ireland, pp. 252–257 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. Tang, X., Abu-Farsakh, M., Hanandeh, S., Chen, Q.: Performance of reinforced-stabilized unpaved test sections built over native soft soil under full-scale moving wheel loads. J. Transp. Res. Board 2511, 81–89 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu, H., Huang, B., Shu, X., Zhao, S.: Evaluation of geogrid reinforcement effects on unbound granular pavement base courses using loaded wheel tester. Geotext. Geomembr. 43, 462–469 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adelino Ferreira
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. I. M. Pinto
    • 2
  • Arminda Almeida
    • 1
  • Natacha Rodrigues
    • 3
  1. 1.CITTA, Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.CEMMPRE, Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations