Advertisement

Bearing Capacity of Square Footing: A Comparative Study Employing Non-associative MC and MCC Model

  • Mousumi Mukherjee
  • Arindam DeyEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

The classical bearing capacity theories adopt a plane-strain framework along with an elastic-perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb (MC) constitutive response of soil. It is well known that associative MC model fails to capture the evolution of principal stress and suffers from excessive dilation prediction. A non-associative extension of MC model is often employed to control such excessive dilation response; however, their applicability in prediction of 3D bearing capacity of footings should be explored. Further, the critical state based Modified Cam-Clay (MCC) models are expected to delineate a better stress-strain prediction of soil and it will be interesting to examine the 3D bearing capacity estimates of regular shaped foundations employing these two different models. In this regard, this article addresses the finite-element based bearing capacity estimation of a square footing resting on the surface of a semi-infinite homogeneous soil medium. The footing is represented by linear-elastic element, while the foundation soil has been represented by both non-associative MC and MCC models. Comparison of the load-displacement response of the uniformly loaded footing, obtained from considering the MC and MCC models, clearly delineates the shortcoming of the MC and necessity of adopting MCC behaviour in a 3-dimensional geotechnical problem.

Keywords

3D bearing capacity Square footing Mohr-Coulomb model Modified Cam-Clay model Dilatancy Load-deformation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Rana Acharyya, Post-Doctoral Researcher, IIT Bombay for his help in creating the PLAXIS 3D models.

References

  1. Abed, A.A., Vermeer, P.A.: Numerical simulation of unsaturated soil behavior. In: Proceedings of the 1st Euro Mediterranean Conference on Advances in Geomaterials and Structures, Tunisia, pp. 1–8 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Acharyya, R., Dey, A.: Evaluation of slip mechanism beneath the shallow footing resting on plane ground by altering flow-rules. In: National Seminar on Advanced Construction and Computational Tools in Geotechniques – Practice to Theory, Indian Geotechnical Society, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, pp. 1–8 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. Acharyya, R., Dey, A.: Importance of dilatancy on the evolution of failure mechanism of a strip footing resting on horizontal ground. INAE Lett. 3(3), 131–142 (2018a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acharyya, R., Dey, A.: Assessment of failure mechanism of a strip footing on horizontal ground considering flow rules. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 3(49), 1–16 (2018b)Google Scholar
  5. Acharyya, R., Dey, A. Kumar, B.: Finite element and ANN-based prediction of bearing capacity of square footing resting on the crest of c-φ soil slope. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1435022
  6. Benmebarek, S., Remadna, M.S., Benmebarek, N., Belounar, L.: Numerical evaluation of the bearing capacity factor \( N_{\gamma }^{\prime } \) of ring footings. Comput. Geotechn. 44, 132–138 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. Bolton, M.D., Lau, C.K.: Vertical bearing capacity factors for circular and strip footings on Mohr-Coulomb soil. Can. Geotech. J. 30, 1024–1033 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerato, A.B., Lutenegger, A.J.: Bearing capacity of square and circular footings on a finite layer of granular soil underlain by a rigid base. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(11), 1496–1501 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dey, A., Mukherjee, M., Acharyya, R.: Importance of constitutive model in assessing 3-D bearing capacity of square footing on clayey soil using finite element analysis. In: 11th Structural Engineering Convention, Kolkata, India, pp. 1–6 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. Drescher, A., Detournay, E.: Limit load in translational failure mechanisms for associative and non-associative materials. Geotechnique 43(3), 443–456 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanna, A., Rahman, A.M.E.: Ultimate bearing capacity of triangular shell strip footings on sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 116(12), 1851–1863 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanna, A.M.: Bearing capacity of foundations on a weak sand layer overlaying a strong deposit. Can. Geotech. J. 19(3), 392–396 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lim, A., Ou, C.-Y., Hsieh, P.G.: Evaluation of clay constitutive models for analysis of deep excavation under undrained conditions. J. GeoEng. 5, 9–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. Loukidis, D., Salgado, R.: Bearing capacity of strip and circular footings in sand using finite elements. Comput. Geotech. 36, 871–879 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manoharan, N., Dasgupta, S.P.: Bearing capacity of surface footings by finite elements. Comput. Geotech. 54(4), 563–586 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. Meyerhof, G.G.: The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations. Geotechnique 2, 301–332 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyerhof, G.G., Koumoto, T.: Inclination factors for bearing capacity of shallow footings. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 113(9), 1013–1018 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nova, R., Montrasio, L.: Settlements of shallow foundations on sand. Geotechnique 41(2), 243–256 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oh, W.T., Vanapalli, S.K.: Modeling the stress versus settlement behaviour of shallow foundations in unsaturated cohesive soils extending the modified total stress approach. Soils Found. 58, 382–397 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reddy, A.S., Singh, A.K., Karnik, S.S.: Bearing capacity of clays whose cohesion increases linearly with depth. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 117(2), 348–353 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shiau, J.S., Lyamin, A.V., Sloan, S.W.: Bearing capacity of a sand layer on clay by finite element limit analysis. Can. Geotech. J. 40, 900–915 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Terzaghi, K.: Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vermeer, P.A., de Borst, R.: Non-associative plasticity for soils, concrete and rock. Heron 29(3), 1–64 (1984)Google Scholar
  24. Vesic, A.S.: Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundation. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 99(SM1), 45–73 (1973)Google Scholar
  25. Wang, D., Bienen, B.: Numerical investigation of penetration of a large-diameter footing into normally consolidated Kaolin clay with a consolidation phase. Geotechnique 66, 947–952 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang, F., Zheng, X.C., Zhao, L.H., Tan, Y.G.: Ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing placed on sand with a rigid basement. Comput. Geotech. 77, 115–119 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao, L., Yang, F., Dan, H.: The influence of horizontal confinement on the bearing capacity factor Nγ of smooth strip footing. Comput. Geotech. 61, 127–131 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIIT MandiMandiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIIT GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations