Advertisement

Improving Performance of Testing Laboratories – A Statistical Review and Evaluation

  • G. I. AnastasopoulosEmail author
  • P. S. Ramakrishnan
  • I. G. Anastasopoulos
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

This paper outlines the most common quality challenges testing laboratories are facing during their accreditation process. Accreditation is the independent evaluation of conformity assessment bodies (i.e. Testing laboratories) against recognized standards to carry out specific activities to ensure their impartiality and competence. Through the application of national and international standards, government, procurers and consumers can have confidence in the quality of test results, inspection reports and certifications provided.

This study has been performed based on data collected by more than 300 testing laboratories, from 41 countries worldwide, accredited against the requirements of the international standard ISO/IEC 17025-2005 “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.”

The Non-Conformities were issued during the accreditation process of various testing laboratories specializing in different testing categories (Civil, Geotechnical, Mechanical, Electrical, Chemical, Microbiological, etc.). Findings vary from commonly reported quality management system issues to the most demanding technical challenges faced by testing laboratories.

The identified Non-Conformities were categorized and statistically processed. The trends are identified and analyzed per quality management system or technical category. Under the accreditation process, laboratories are required to respond to any significant findings with a submittal of a corrective action plan containing an analysis of the root cause, details of actions taken to resolve the issue and strategies to prevent reoccurrence. Various responses were analyzed and some suggestions and good practices were gleaned from these submittals. Opportunities for improvement are presented for each corresponding category of findings.

References

  1. 1.
    The new ISO/IEC 17025:2017, Dr. George Anastasopoulos, CAL LAB the International Journal of Metrology, pp. 30–35, July 2017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC 17025:2005, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO/IEC 17025:2017, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO/IEC 17025 moves to final stage of revision, Sandrine Tranchard, September 2017. ISO site: https://bit.ly/2ACimjY
  5. 5.
    Facts and Figures, Table: Total Number of Accredited Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs) (2017). ILAC site: https://bit.ly/2ANHdBt
  6. 6.
    ILAC MRA and Signatories (2019). ILAC site: https://ibit.ly/2ACjcx8
  7. 7.
    IAS Accreditation Criteria for Testing Laboratories AC89, September 2018. www.iasonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/89-Sep-2018.pdf
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC 17021-1: Conformity assessment—Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. ISO (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. I. Anastasopoulos
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. S. Ramakrishnan
    • 1
  • I. G. Anastasopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.International Accreditation ServiceBreaUSA
  2. 2.School of Letters and SciencesUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations