Risk Analysis of Drivers’ Distraction: Effect of Navigation Tools

  • Jacob Adedayo AdedejiEmail author
  • Xoliswa E. Feikie
  • Mohamed M. H. Mostafa
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)


Road users’ characteristics are amongst the leading causes of traffic fatalities, leading to reduced levels of traffic safety. There are numerous characteristics of road users, yet, two of these characteristics standout, these include the visual acuity factor and the reaction process. There are various factors that contribute to the delay time and reaction process of drivers, and among these are the non-driving-related activities such as adjusting the stereo, environmental controls, conversing with passengers, using a cell phone, searching for street addresses, looking at/for a building…etc. However, there is not a lot of research on non-driving activities such as the use of navigation tools in the form of Global Positioning System (GPS) and navigation phone applications while driving. Through multiple data collection approaches, this study attempts to highlight the effect of navigation tools and risks involved when used while driving. Subsequently answering these questions on the drivers’ reaction process; (i) Can navigation tools be classified as non-driving activities, (ii) Do navigation tools influence drivers’ reaction and decision time and (iii) What are the possible remedies if it affects drivers’ decision time. The findings of the study highlight the risk, the impact of navigation tools on drivers’ behaviour, its influence on traffic crashes and propose the possible countermeasures to this effect.


Traffic fatalities Drivers’ distractions Behaviour Traffic safety Navigation tools 


  1. Drews, F.A., Pasupathi, M., Strayer, D.L.: Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 14(4), 392 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ellison, A.B., Greaves, S.P., Bliemer, M.C.: Driver behaviour profiles for road safety analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 76, 118–132 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kanarachos, S., Christopoulos, S.R.G., Chroneos, A.: Smartphones as an integrated platform for monitoring driver behaviour: the role of sensor fusion and connectivity. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 95, 867–882 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kothari, C.R.: Research Methodology-Methods and Techniques, 2nd edn. New Age International Publishers, New Delhi (2004)Google Scholar
  5. Maciej, J., Nitsch, M., Vollrath, M.: Conversing while driving: the importance of visual information for conversation modulation. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 14(6), 512–524 (2011). Scholar
  6. Renaudin, V., Dommes, A., Guilbot, M.: Engineering, human, and legal challenges of navigation systems for personal mobility. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18(1), 177–191 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Seshadri, N., Karaoguz, J., Broadcom Corp.: Sharing of GPS information between mobile devices. U.S. Patent Application 12/026,582 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. Stone, M., Knapper, J., Evans, G., Aravopoulou, E.: Information management in the smart city. Bottom Line 31(3/4), 234–249 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tedesco, C.: Cell Phone Use While Driving. Policy Memorandum Institute for Public Policy Studies, University of Denver (2014)Google Scholar
  10. World Health Organization: World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs sustainable development goals. World Health Organization (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob Adedayo Adedeji
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xoliswa E. Feikie
    • 2
  • Mohamed M. H. Mostafa
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringCentral University of Technology, Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering and GeomaticsDurban University of TechnologyDurbanSouth Africa
  3. 3.School of EngineeringCivil Engineering, University of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations