Stress in Rock Slopes: Non-persistent Versus Persistent Joint Model

  • Abdel Kareem Alzo’ubiEmail author
  • Osama Mohamed
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)


In rock slopes prone to topple, mechanical, physical or chemical weathering might degrade the rock mass properties and compromise the stability of that rock slopes. However, the nature of the joints distribution and the degree of continuity is extremely important in determining the stresses magnitude and sign inside the rock masses. This is mainly due to the stress concentration and distribution near the joint tips inside the rock slope if rock bridges exist. In this paper, a man-made rock slope is numerically modeled and investigated under two types of joint sceneries; out-dipping persistent joint and non-persistent joint models. One point, near the crest, inside the rock slope were used to monitor and measure the major and minor principal stresses as the excavation at the toe of the slope progressed step by step. To generate the two models, the discrete element method with the Voronoi tessellation joint pattern was utilized. One of the advantages of this modeling approach is that it al-lows for generating non-persistent joint as well as persistent joint patterns inside the rock slope. The results of this numerical study show that in large rock slopes such as the one examined in this study, the stress concentration in the non-persistent model is three to four times larger than the stresses at the same point in the persistent joints model. The minor principal stresses in both modeling cases were negative tensile stresses and up to several MPa in magnitude.



The author would like to acknowledge the financial contribution of Abu Dhabi University and the ORSP under grant number 19300344.


  1. Alzo’ubi, A.K.: State of the art, reconstruction of damaged zones: transitory stresses effect and factors controlling rock mass stability. Int. J. Geomate 14(41), 35–43 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alzo’ubi, A.K.: Rock slopes processes and recommended methods for analysis. Int. J. Geomate 11(25), 2520–2527 (2016a)Google Scholar
  3. Alzo’ubi, A.K.: Modeling yield propagation of jointed synthetic rocks. In: Ulusay, et al. (eds.) Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering: From the Past to the Future, Proceeding of the 2016 ISRM International Symposium, EUROCK 2016, Cappadocia, Turkey, 29–31 August 2016, vol. 1, pp. 113–118. CRC Press: Taylor & Francis Group, London (2016b). ISBN 978-1-138-03265-1Google Scholar
  4. Alzo’ubi, A.K., Martin, C.D., Cruden, D.: A discrete element damage model for rock slopes. In: Eberhardt, E., Stead, D., Morrison, T. (eds.) Rock Mechanics, Meeting Society’s Challenges and demands, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, vol. 1, pp. 503–510 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Alzo’ubi, A. K., Martin, C.D., Cruden, D.M.: Effect of mining on deformation patterns in a large open pit rock slope. In: 21st Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, RockEng 12-Rock Engineering for Natural Resources, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 229–236 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Alzo’ubi, A.K., Martin, C.D., Cruden, D.M.: Influence of tensile strength on toppling failure in centrifuge tests. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47, 974–982 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bieniawski, Z.: Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Balkema, A. (ed.) Exploration for Rock Engineering, Cape Town, Johannesburg, vol.1, pp. 97–106 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. De Freitas, M., Watters, R.: Some field examples of toppling failure. Geotechnique 23, 485–514 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodman, R., Bray, J.: Toppling of rock slopes. In: Specialty Conference on Rock Engineering for Foundations and Slopes, pp. 201–234. ASCE, Boulder (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Hoek, E., Brown, E.: The Hoek–Brown failure criterion – a 1988 update. In: Proceedings of the 15th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. pp. 31–38 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. Newcomen, W., Murray, C., Shwydiuk, L.: Monitoring pit wall deformation in real time at Highland Valley Copper. In: CAMI Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  12. Tosney, J., Chance, A., Milne, D., Amon, F.A.: Modelling approach for large-scale slope instability at Highland Valley Copper. In: Mining Millennium 2000: International Convention and Trade Exhibition. Content Management Corp. Richmond Hill, ON, Toronto, Canada(2000)Google Scholar
  13. Tosney, J.: A design approach for large scale rock slopes. Master’s thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon (2001)Google Scholar
  14. Tosney, J., Milne, D., Chance, A.V., Amon, F.: Verification of a large scale slope instability mechanism at Highland Valley Copper. Int. J. Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 18(4), 273–288 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Waldner, M., Smith, G., Willis, R.: Lornex. In: Brown, A. (ed.) Porphyry Deposits of the Canadian Cordillera, vol. 15. CIM (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Abu Dhabi UniversityAl AinUAE
  2. 2.Abu Dhabi UniversityAbu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations