Advertisement

Efficiency of Naïve Bayes Technique Based on Clustering to Detect Congestion in Wireless Sensor Network

  • Jayashri B. MadalgiEmail author
  • S. Anupama Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 38)

Abstract

Wireless sensor network (WSN) is the network of sensor nodes set up to supervise physical observable fact. Congestion is state in the network when too many packets are present in the network than capacity of network. Congestion can be at node level or link level. Our work is to related to node level congestion. Because of funnel like topology of wireless sensor network, the congestion occurs at the nodes near sink as all the nodes start sending data to sink node whenever an event occurs. Congestion detection is vital as it leads in poor performance of network. In this paper we have implemented the machine learning techniques to detect congestion in wireless sensor network using Ensemble approach of clustering and classification. The Naïve Bayes classification based on the K- means and Expectation- Maximization clustering algorithms are applied to generate the classifier model. The classification model is also generated using only Naïve Bayes algorithm and the performance is compared with classifier of ensemble approach. The analysis of performance parameters of the generated models indicates that EM based Naïve Bayes classifier model is more accurate in detection of the congestion for the generated our network data set.

Keywords

Naïve Bayes K means clustering EM clustering Wireless sensor networks Congestion detection 

References

  1. 1.
    Dawhkova, E., Gurtov, A.: Survey on congestion control mechanisms for wireless sensor networks. Center for Wireless Communication, Finland (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Madalgi, J.B., Kumar, S.A.: Development of wireless sensor network congestion detection classifier using support vector machine. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS-2018). RVCE, Bengaluru, IEEE Digital Library (2018). ISBN 978-1-5386-6078-2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karami, H., Taheri, M.: A novel framework to generate clustering algorithms based on a particular classification structure. In: Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing Conference (AISP), Shiraz, pp. 201–204 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AISP.2017.8324081
  4. 4.
    Chakraborty, T.: EC3: combining clustering and classification for ensemble learning. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), New Orleans, LA, pp. 781–786 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2017.92
  5. 5.
    Erol, H., Tyoden, B.M., Erol, R.: Classification performances of data mining clustering algorithms for remotely sensed multispectral image data. In: 2018 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), Thessaloniki, pp. 1–4 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2018.8466320
  6. 6.
    Zhou, L., Wang, L., Ge, X., Shi, Q.: A clustering-based KNN improved algorithm CLKNN for text classification. In: 2010 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Wuhan, pp. 212–215 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CAR.2010.5456668
  7. 7.
    Ru, X., Liu, Z., Huang, Z., Jiang, W.: Class discovery based on K-means clustering and perturbation analysis. In: 2015 8th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), Shenyang, pp. 1236–1240 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP.2015.7408070
  8. 8.
    Alapati, Y.K.: Combining clustering with classification: a technique to improve classification accuracy. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 5(6), 2319–7323 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papas, D., Tjortjis, C.: Combining clustering and classification for software quality evaluation. In: Likas, A., Blekas, K., Kalles, D. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Applications, SETN 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8445. Springer, Cham (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Oliveira, E., Basoni, H.G., Saúde, M.R., Ciarelli, P.M.: Combining clustering and classification approaches for reducing the effort of automatic tweets classification. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval (KDIR-2014), pp. 465–472 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.5220/0005159304650472
  11. 11.
    Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V.: Introduction to Data Mining (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gogte Institute of TechnologyBelgaviIndia
  2. 2.Rashtreeya Vidyalaya College of EnggBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations