Proposed UX Model for Children Educational Mobile Application

  • Kiranjeet KaurEmail author
  • Khairul Shafee Kalid
  • Savita K. Sugathan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11870)


The evolution of mobile learning is robustly popular among children these days since the engagement is portable and owns unique interactive specialties that tends to attract more users. User experience (UX) is one of the potential approaches in designing mobile applications to deliver a complete experience for utilizing a technology. However, this concept of UX has not been adopted while designing educational mobile application for children even when researchers have claimed that children’s experience differs from adults. Therefore, the inadequate experience of mobile learning leads in affecting children’s cognitive skills in learning perspective. The problem statement argued in this paper is children’s cognitive skills on solving educational critical thinking problems are diminishing due to lacking of adequate elements while designing educational mobile application. To support the problem this paper aims to develop EduMobile UX Model for children when designers are developing educational mobile application for them. This study conducted a literature review to develop EduMobile UX Model. This model will be referred by designers when designing children educational mobile application.


User Experience Children educational application Cognitive skills 


  1. 1.
    Kraleva, R.S.: Designing an interface for a mobile application based on children’s opinion. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 11(1), 53 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lallemand, C., Gronier, G., Koenig, V.: User experience: a concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners’ perspectives through an international survey. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 35–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, D., Nielsen, J.: The Definition of User Experience (UX). Nielsen Norman Group (2016). Accessed 02 June 2018
  4. 4.
    Pucillo, F., Cascini, G.: A framework for user experience, needs and affordances. Des. Stud. 35(2), 160–179 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    International standard: International standard, vol. 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mullins, C.: Responsive, mobile app, mobile first: untangling the UX design web in practical experience. In: Proceedings of 33rd Annual International Conference on Design Communication (SIGDOC 2015), pp. 22:1–22:6 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, C.-H., Jang, G., Chai, Y.-H.: Culturability in mobile data services: a qualitative study of the relationship between cultural characteristics and user-experience attributes. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 20(3), 285–303 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nesset, V., Large, A.: Children in the information technology design process : a review of theories and their applications. vol. 26, pp. 140–161 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fadel, L.M.: Experience-Centered Web Design Model. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014. LNCS, vol. 8518, pp. 92–103. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Law, E.L.: The measurability and predictability of user experience. pp. 1–9 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V.: Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices: update. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Chilean Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - ChileCHI 2013, no. 2241, pp. 24–29 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vorvoreanu, M., Gray, C.M., Parsons, P., Rasche, N.: Advancing UX Education. In: Proceedings of 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2017, pp. 1441–1446 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tahir, R., Arif, F.: A measurement model based on usability metrics for mobile learning user interface for children. Int. J. E-Learn. Edu. Technol. Digit. Media 1(1), 16–31 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wong, C.Y., Chu, K., Pauzi, M.A.M.: Advocating UX practice in industry: lessons learnt from UX innovate bootcamp. In: Proceedings of 2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering i-USEr, pp. 204–209 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al-Khalifa, H.S., Garcia, R.A.: Website design based on cultures: an investigation of saudis, filipinos, and indians government websites’ attributes. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014. LNCS, vol. 8518, pp. 15–27. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ariffin, S.A.: Needs and potentials for studying local malaysian culture through mobile learning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in Indonesia - CHIuXiD 2017, no. Mcmc, pp. 60–66 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nagalingam, V., Ibrahim, R.: A review of user experience (UX) frameworks for educational games, pp. 134–143 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seol, S.H., Ko, D.S., Yeo, I.S.: UX analysis based on TR and UTAUT of sports smart wearable devices. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 11(8), 4162–4179 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E.O.C., Fadzil, N.M., Hassan, N.M.: The UX of amila pregnancy on mobile device. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1891, p. 020061 (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahlke, S., Thüring, M.: Studying antecedents of emotional experiences in interactive contexts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2007, p. 915 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagalingam, V., Ibrahim, R.: Finding the right elements user experience elements for educational games. In: Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on E-commerce, E-Business and E-Government, vol. Part F1296, pp. 90–93. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., Riezebos, P.: A research framework of smart education. Smart Learn. Environ. 3(1), 4 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patil, M.S., et al.: UX design to promote undergraduate projects to products: case study. In: Proceedings of - 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education MITE, pp. 302–307 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yilmaz, R.M.: Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54, 240–248 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    MacDonald, C.M., Rozaklis, L.: Assessing the implementation of authentic, client-facing student projects in user experience (UX) education: insights from multiple stakeholders. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54(1), 268–278 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Masood, M., Thigambaram, M.: The usability of mobile applications for pre-schoolers. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 197(February), 1818–1826 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Park, J., Han, S.H., Kim, H.K., Oh, S., Moon, H.: Modeling user experience: a case study on a mobile device. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 43(2), 187–196 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibrahim, N., Fatimah, W., Ahmad, W., Shafie, A.: User experience study on folktales mobile application for children’s education. In: Proceedings of - NGMAST 2015 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, pp. 353–358 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sugiyama, Y., Kato, T., Sakamoto, T., Science, A.I.: A proposed quantitative UX analysis method based on a psychometric, no. 2008, pp. 434–443 (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoehle, H., Venkatesh, V.: Mobile application usability : conceptualization & instrument development, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 435–472 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chau, C.L., Bers, M.U., Pott, M.: Positive technological development for young children in the context of children’s mobile apps a dissertation submitted by Clement L. Chau in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Child Development Tufts Unive (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Patwardhan, M., Stoll, R., Hamel, D.B., Amresh, A., Gary, K.A., Pina, A.: Designing a mobile application to support the indicated prevention and early intervention of childhood anxiety. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Health - WH 2015, pp. 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moreno, H.B.R., Ramirez, M.R., Rojas, E.M., Soto, M.D.C.S.: Digital education using apps for today’s children. Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, vol. 2018-June, pp. 1–6 (2018)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chuan, N.K., Sivaji, A., Loo, F.A., Ahmad, W.F.W., Nathan, S.S.: Evaluating ‘Gesture Interaction’ requirements of mobile applications for deaf users: discovering the needs of the hearing-impiared in using touchscreen gestures. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Open Systems ICOS, pp. 90–95 (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fernandes, L., et al.: Bringing User Experience empirical data to gesture-control and somatic interaction in virtual reality videogames : an exploratory study with a multimodal interaction prototype (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ting, J., Jing, Y., Jianbo, X.: The application of multi-perception user experience in emotional design characteristics parameter models, pp. 424–427 (2018)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dow, S., Gerber, E., Wong, A.: A pilot study of using crowds in the classroom. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2013, p. 227 (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Aubusson, P.: Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Comput. Edu. 121, 30–58 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Laine, T.H., Nygren, E., Dirin, A., Suk, H.J.: Science spots AR: a platform for science learning games with augmented reality. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 64(3), 507–531 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Faily, S., Lyle, J., Flechais, I., Simpson, A., Fléchais, I., Simpson, A.: Usability and security by design: a case study in research and development. In: Proceedings of 2015 Workshop Usable Security (USEC 2015), p. 10 (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Figueiredo, M., Solmaz, A., Rodrigues, J.: An interactive app for stem learning in mobile. Eurasia Proc. Educ. Soc. Sci. 4, 465–470 (2016)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Heintz, M., Law, E.L.C.: Challenges and resolutions for engaging teachers and students in participatory design of online science learning resources. CEUR Workshop Proc. 1776, 42–48 (2016)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ni, Q., Yu, Y.: Research on educational mobile games and the effect it has on the cognitive development of preschool children. In: Third International Conference on Digital Information, Networking, and Wireless Communications, pp. 165–169 (2015)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Feldman, D.H.: Cognitive development in childhood. Handb. Psychol. 6, 197–213 (2013)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ellin Kotsky, S.: New Trends in Conceptual Representation: Challenges to Piaget’s Theory - Google Books. Psychology Press (2013). Theory of cognitive development co.’s. Accessed 07 June 2018
  46. 46.
    Cherry, K.: Piaget’s 4 Stages of Cognitive Development Explained (2018). Accessed 02 June 2018
  47. 47.
    Yin, R.K.: Case study research - design and methods. Clin. Res. 2, 8–13 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiranjeet Kaur
    • 1
    Email author
  • Khairul Shafee Kalid
    • 1
  • Savita K. Sugathan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Information SciencesUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASSeri IskandarMalaysia

Personalised recommendations