Advertisement

Evaluation of a Virtual Reality (VR) Learning Tool for Fundamental Turbine Engineering Concepts

  • Hidayah SulaimanEmail author
  • Siti Najiha Apandi
  • Azmi Mohd. Yusof
  • Rubijesmin Abdul Latif
  • Nazrita Ibrahim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11870)

Abstract

The education industry have evolved to meet the expectations of current technological trend. The field of mechanical engineering involves the study, design, development, construction, and testing of tools, engines, and machines. One of the critical equipment in the area of power plant engineering is the turbine, which are used to generate power. Students are taught to understand the drawings of these turbines through books or videos and occasionally visit the power plant site. This approach may not be appealing to the digital natives as they prefer to use technology to touch, feel and see the aspects of the turbine at any given time. The lack of engagement, shrinking attention span and obsession with digital devices amongst the younger generation have caused educators to experiment with various means of teaching techniques in ensuring that knowledge is successfully imparted. Hence, this paper provide results of a pilot study on a usability evaluation conducted on a group of undergraduate students to analyze the usability of a virtual reality (VR) application using the System Usability Scale (SUS) instrument. The study also aims to find out if there are any significant differences among gender and computer gamers in using the VR tool. Results indicate that the VR application requires further enhancement in terms of self-learning and interaction familiarity.

Keywords

Virtual learning Education 4.0 Engineering education Usability Virtual reality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank TNB as the grant provider for this project and UNITEN R&D Sdn. Bhd for managing the grant. Thank you for the continuous support and assistance in ensuring that project is carried out smoothly. This work has been supported by the university, and we would like to thank the participating users with their involvement in this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Strother, J.B.: An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 3(1) (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khanzode, V.V., Maiti, J., Ray, P.K.: Occupational injury and accident research: a comprehensive review. Saf. Sci. 50(5), 1355–1367 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., Trivedi, A.: Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: an interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Comput. Educ. 53(1), 169–182 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bower, M., Lee, M.J., Dalgarno, B.: Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 48(2), 407–430 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, H.M., Liaw, S.S., Lai, C.M.: Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: a case study of desktop and projection-based display systems. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(1), 3–19 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alhalabi, W.: Virtual reality systems enhance students’ achievements in engineering education. Behav. Inform. Technol. 35(11), 919–925 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moro, C., Stromberga, Z., Stirling, A.: Virtualisation devices for student learning: comparison between desktop-based (Oculus Rift) and mobile-based (Gear VR) virtual reality in medical and health science education. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 33(6) (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butt, A.L., Kardong-Edgren, S., Ellertson, A.: Using game-based virtual reality with haptics for skill acquisition. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 16, 25–32 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qureshi, K., Irfan, M.: Usability evaluation of e-learning applications. In: A case study of It’s Learning from a Student’s Perspective. School of Computing, Blekinge Institute of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sulaiman, H., Suid, N., Idris, M.A.B.: Usability evaluation of confirm-a learning tool towards education 4.0. In 2018 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), pp. 73–78. IEEE, November 2018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohanty, A., Dash, D.: Engineering education in India: preparation of professional engineering educators. J. Hum. Resour. Sustainabil. Stud. 4(02), 92 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., Johnson, E.: Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Comput. Educ. 95, 174–187 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usabil. Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ayad, K., Rigas, D.: Multi-modal game based learning: satisfaction and users achievement approach. In: WSEAS International Conference on Recent Advances in Software Engineering, pp. 166–171, February 2010Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Orfanou, K., Tselios, N., Katsanos, C.: Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: Empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16(2), 227–246 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gros, B.: Digital games in education: the design of games-based learning environments. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 40(1), 23–38 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bastug, E., Bennis, M., Médard, M., Debbah, M.: Toward interconnected virtual reality: opportunities, challenges, and enablers. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55(6), 110–117 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Napa, S., Moore, M., Bardyn, T.: Advancing cardiac surgery case planning and case review conferences using virtual reality in medical libraries: evaluation of the usability of two virtual reality apps. JMIR Hum. Factors 6(1), e12008 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borsci, S., Lawson, G., Jha, B., Burges, M., Salanitri, D.: Effectiveness of a multidevice 3D virtual environment application to train car service maintenance procedures. Virtual Reality 20(1), 41–55 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boletsis, C., Cedergren, J. E.: VR locomotion in the new era of virtual reality: an empirical comparison of prevalent techniques. In: Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakamura, W.T., de Oliveira, E.H.T., Conte, T.: Usability and user experience evaluation of learning management systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 3, pp. 97–108 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Belarbi, N., Chafiq, N., Talbi, M., Namir, A.: An experimental case study: comparing perceived usability of two mobile environments of a SPOC. Int. J. Comput. 6(2), 67–70 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaya, A., Ozturk, R., Altin Gumussoy, C.: Usability measurement of mobile applications with system usability scale (SUS). In: Calisir, F., Cevikcan, E., Camgoz Akdag, H. (eds.) Industrial Engineering in the Big Data Era. LNMIE, pp. 389–400. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03317-0_32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mostafa, A.E., et al.: Designing NeuroSimVR: a stereoscopic virtual reality spine surgery simulator. Science (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gerber, S.M., Müri, R.M., Mosimann, U.P., Nef, T., Urwyler, P.:. Virtual reality for activities of daily living training in neurorehabilitation: a usability and feasibility study in healthy participants. In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1–4. IEEE, July 2018Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O.D., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., Kryspin-Exner, I.: Is virtual reality made for men only? Exploring gender differences in the sense of presence. In: Proceedings of the International Society on Presence Research, pp. 103–112 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ausburn, L.J., Martens, J., Washington, A., Steele, D., Washburn, E.: A cross-case analysis of gender issues in desktop virtual reality learning environments. J. STEM Teach. Educ. 46(3), 6 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Annetta, L., Mangrum, J., Holmes, S., Collazo, K., Cheng, M.T.: Bridging realty to virtual reality: investigating gender effect and student engagement on learning through video game play in an elementary school classroom. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 31(8), 1091–1113 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hidayah Sulaiman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Siti Najiha Apandi
    • 2
  • Azmi Mohd. Yusof
    • 1
  • Rubijesmin Abdul Latif
    • 1
  • Nazrita Ibrahim
    • 3
  1. 1.Informatics Department, College of Computing and InformaticsUniversiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia
  2. 2.UNITEN R&D Sdn. Bhd.KajangMalaysia
  3. 3.Institute of Informatics and Computing in EnergyUniversiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations