Advertisement

Virtual Lower Limb Stroke Rehabilitation to Assess Post Stroke Patients

  • Lee Wei Jian
  • Syadiah Nor Wan ShamsuddinEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11870)

Abstract

Stroke is a disease that causes disability in adults due to the abrupt interruption of constant blood flow to the brain. Most people encounter difficulties with movement after a stroke, which prevents them from moving around. However, patients often show a lessened endurance and motivation in participating in these boring exercises. This may lead to an early termination of stroke rehabilitation, which can cause permanent disability in life. The application of virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation provides an immersive environment to increase the engagement of patients in rehabilitation exercises. In this study, a prototype named virtual lower limb stroke rehabilitation (VRLite) was developed and tested with post stroke patients on the accuracy of measurements and its usability and acceptance. The measurements of knee angles using Kinect and goniometer were compared using Bland-Altman plot to assess the system validity. The upper and lower LoA were 7.2° and −7.5° respectively. The result shows that 95% of LoA were within the upper and lower limit. The result shows that there is no significant difference between the measurements of knee angles using Kinect and goniometer. Hence, the developed program can be used interchangeably with the conventional rehabilitation.

Keywords

Stroke rehabilitation Virtual reality Lower limb 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is financially supported by the eScience Fund awarded by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia.

References

  1. 1.
    Katan, M., Luft, A.: Global burden of stroke. Semin. Neurol. 38(2), 208–211 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lo Buono, V., Corallo, F., Bramanti, P., Marino, S.: Coping strategies and health-related quality of life after stroke. J. Health Psychol. 22(1), 16–28 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aqueveque, P., Ortega, P., Pino, E., Saavedra, F., Germany, E., Gómez, B.: Physical Disabilities - Therapeutic Implications. InTech, London (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qiu, Y., et al.: Fun-KneeTM: a novel smart knee sleeve for total-knee-replacement rehabilitation with gamification. In: 2017 IEEE 5th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health, SeGAH, pp. 1–8. IEEE, Heidelberg (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hadning, I., Ikawati, Z., Andayani, T.M.: Stroke treatment cost analysis for consideration on health cost determination using INA- CBGs at Jogja hospital. Int. J. Public Health Sci. 4(4), 288–293 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cornick, J.E., Blascovich, J.: Are virtual environments the new frontier in obesity management? Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 8(11), 650–658 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porras, D.C., Siemonsma, P., Inzelberg, R., Zeilig, G., Plotnik, M.: Advantages of virtual reality in the rehabilitation of balance and gait: Systematic review. Neurology 90(22), 1017–1025 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wiederhold, B., Miller, I., Wiederhold, M.: Using virtual reality to mobilize health care: mobile virtual reality technology for attenuation of anxiety and pain. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 7(1), 106–109 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bartnicka, J., Herrera, C., Michnik, R., Pavan, E.E., Vercesi, P., Varela-Donoso, E., Garrido, D.: The role of virtual reality and biomechanical technologies in stroke rehabilitation. In: Nazir, S., Teperi, A.-M., Polak-Sopińska, A. (eds.) AHFE 2018. AISC, vol. 785, pp. 351–361. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93882-0_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pei, W., Xu, G., Li, M., Ding, H., Zhang, S., Luo, A.: A motion rehabilitation self-training and evaluation system using Kinect. In: 2016 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence, pp. 353–357. IEEE, Xi’an (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patil, Y.: A multi-interface vr platform for rehabilitation research. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 154–159. ACM, Denver (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    López-Jaquero, V., Montero, F., Teruel, M.A.: Influence awareness: considering motivation in computer-assisted rehabilitation. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 10(6), 2185–2197 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wei Jian, L., Syadiah Nor, W.S.: The design of virtual lower limb rehabilitation for post-stroke patients. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 16(1), 544–552 (2019)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327(8476), 307–310 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doǧan, N.Ö., et al.: The accuracy of mainstream end-tidal carbon dioxide levels to predict the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations presented to the ED. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 32(5), 408–411 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horne, M., Thomas, N., Vail, A., Selles, R., McCabe, C., Tyson, S.: Staff’s views on delivering patient-led therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study with lessons for trial fidelity. Trials 16(1), 1–8 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics and ComputingUniversiti Sultan Zainal AbidinKuala TerengganuMalaysia

Personalised recommendations