Advertisement

A Knowledge Representation for Planning-Based Story Generation Applied to the Manual and Automatic Encoding of Plot

  • Rushit Sanghrajka
  • R. Michael YoungEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11869)

Abstract

There have been a range of coding schemes to code story structure. However, few of these coding schemes map directly to expressive formal models of story that also characterize character beliefs or the complexities that arise when mistaken beliefs lead to action failure. We describe HeadCode, a coding scheme motivated by recent work in plan-based story generation.

Keywords

Story generation Coding schemes Intentional planning 

References

  1. 1.
    Cardona-Rivera, R.E., Cassell, B.A., Ware, S.G., Young, R.M.: Indexter: a computational model of the event-indexing situation model for characterizing narratives. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, pp. 34–43 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elson, D.K., McKeown, K.R.: A platform for symbolically encoding human narratives. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: Intelligent Narrative Technologies, pp. 29–36 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fikes, R., Nilsson, N.: Strips: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. In: Allen, J., Hendler, J., Tate, A. (eds.) Readings in Planning. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerrig, R.: Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. Yale University Press, New Haven (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harmon, S.: Narrative encoding for computational reasoning and adaptation. Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Cruz (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Josselson, R.: The present of the past: dialogues with memory over time. J. Pers. 77(3), 647–668 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korobov, N.: ‘he’s got no game’: young men’s stories about failed romantic and sexual experiences. J. Gend. Stud. 18(2), 99–114 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lilgendahl, J.P., McLean, K.C., Mansfield, C.D.: When is meaning making unhealthy for the self? the roles of neuroticism, implicit theories, and memory telling in trauma and transgression memories. Memory 21(1), 79–96 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, H., Lieberman, H.: Metafor: visualizing stories as code. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pp. 305–307. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McAdams, D.P., McLean, K.C.: Narrative identity. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22(3), 233–238 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niehaus, J., Young, R.M.: Cognitive models of discourse comprehension for narrative generation. Literary Linguistic Comput. 29(4), 561–582 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pasupathi, M., Rich, B.: Inattentive listening undermines self-verification in personal storytelling. J. Pers. 73(4), 1051–1086 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schachter, E.P.: Identity configurations: a new perspective on identity formation in contemporary society. J. Pers. 72(1), 167–200 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stern, L., Kirmayer, L.J.: Knowledge structures in illness narratives: development and reliability of a coding scheme. Transcult. Psychiatry 41(1), 130–142 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461504041358. pMID: 15171211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thorne, B., Young, R.M.: Generating stories that include failed actions by modeling false character beliefs. In: Working Notes of the AIIDE Workshop on Intelligent Narrative Technologies (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Young, R.: Sketching a generative model of intention management for characters in stories: adding intention management to a belief-driven story planning algorithms. In: Working Notes of the AIIDE Workshop on Intelligent Narrative Technologies (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zwaan, R.A., Langston, M.C., Graesser, A.C.: The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychol. Sci. 6(5), 292–297 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations