Advertisement

The Safety of Patients in Critical Care

  • María Cruz Martín Delgado
Chapter

Abstract

Patient safety has become a priority of all healthcare systems. Global policies have been implemented to reduce the number of incidents related to patient safety. There are still many patients who suffer damages derived from healthcare interventions. The impact of such events extends not only to family members but also to the professionals themselves and to health institutions creating a significant economic burden. Most studies have been directed to the epidemiology of adverse events (AEs), an intent to analyze their causes and their consequences. Many safe practices have been promoted to reduce these risk events. Recently, aspects related to post-AE performance have become more relevant. Risk management involves, among other actions, the identification, notification, and analysis of the AE that point out potential failures in the system and the root cause with the ultimate goal of establishing improvement actions and avoiding their recurrence. Gradually these strategies have been incorporated into institutional policies, thereby improving the culture of safety. However, there are still parts of the process that require research and development such as disclosing AE to patients and families and supporting professionals after being involved in an AE.

Keywords

Patient safety Intensive care medicine, Critical care, Second victims Open disclosure Adverse events, Information 

References

  1. 1.
    World Alliance for Patient Safety. Disponible en: (último acceso abril 2019). http://www.who.int/patientsafety/en
  2. 2.
    James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9(3):122–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, et al. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2008;17:216–23.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Making Health Care Safer II – An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Disponible en: (último acceso abril 2019) http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/ptsafetyuptp.html
  5. 5.
    Astier-Peña MP, Olivera-Cañadas G. The challenge of upholding the culture of patient safety in the health institutions. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2017 Apr 30;40(1):5–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nieva VF, Sorra J. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system. Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(suppl II):ii17–23.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The World Health Organization. World Alliance for Patient Safety. the conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety. Version 1.1. Final Technical Report and Technical Annexes. January 2009. Disponible en: (último acceso abril 2019) http://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf
  8. 8.
    Howell AM, Burns EM, Bouras G, Donaldson LJ, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Can patient safety incident reports be used to compare hospital safety? Results from a quantitative analysis of the English National Reporting and learning system data. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144107.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barach P, Small S. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):759–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwendimann R, Blatter C, Dhaini S, Simon M, Ausserhofer D. The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events – a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):521.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agbabiaka TB, Lietz M, Mira JJ, Warner B. A literature-based economic evaluation of healthcare preventable adverse events in Europe. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(1):9–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leape LL, Berwick DM. Safe health care: are we up to it? BMJ. 2000;320:725–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morris MW, Moore PC, Sim DL. Choosing remedies after accidents: counterfactual thoughts and the focus on fixing “human error”. Psychon Bull Rev. 1999;6(4):579–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320:768–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suprani P. Reduction of human error in health: research, theoretical analysis model, and prevention. Prof Inferm. 2002;55(4):195–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1154–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rothschild JM, Landrigan CP, Cronin JW, et al. The critical care safety study: the incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(8):1694–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Merino P, Álvarez J, Cruz Martín M, et al. SYREC study investigators. Adverse events in Spanish intensive care units: the SYREC study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:105–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alonso-Ovies a NN, Martin MC, et al. Safety incidents in airway and mechanical ventilation in Spanish UCUs: the IVeMVA study. J Crit Care. 2018;47:238–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valentin A, Capuzzo M, Guidet B, Research Group on Quality Improvement of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, et al. Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational sentinel events evaluation (SEE) study. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1591–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Valentin A, Capuzzo M, Guidet B, Research Group on Quality Improvement of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) study Investigators, et al. Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study. BMJ. 2009;338:814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Vesin A, et al. OUTCOMEREA study group. Selected medical errors in the intensive care unit: results of the IATROREF study, parts I and II. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:134–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Valentin A, Schiffinger M, Steyrer J, et al. Safety climate reduces medication and dislodgement errors in routine intensive care practice. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:391–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anglés Coll R, Fernández Dorado F. Editores. Conferencia de expertos de la SOCMIC. Seguridad del paciente crítico. Merino de Cos P. Incidentes sin daño y eventos adversos en Medicina Intensiva. Edikamed. 2014; 25–34.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moreno RP, Rhodes A, Donchin Y, European Society of Intensive Care. Patient safety in intensive care medicine: the declaration of Vienna. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(10):1667–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Safe Practices for Better Healthcare– 2010 Update. Endorsed Set of 34 Safe Practices Disponible en: (último acceso mayo 2019) https://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/Safe_Practices_2010.aspx
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, et al. The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 2):365–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Allegranzi B, Sax H, Pittet D. Hand hygiene and healthcare system change within multi-modal promotion: a narrative review. J Hosp Infect. 2013;83(Suppl. 1):S3–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muscedere J, Dodek P, Keenan S, et al. VAP guidelines committee and the Canadian critical care trials group: comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: prevention. J Crit Care. 2008;23:126–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saint S, Greene MT, Krein SL, et al. A program to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in acute care. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2111–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Palomar M, Álvarez-Lerma F, Riera A, Bacteremia Zero Working Group, et al. Impact of a national multimodal intervention to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection in the ICU: the Spanish experience. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2364–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Álvarez-Lerma F, Palomar-Martínez M, Sánchez-García M, et al. Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: the multimodal approach of the Spanish ICU “pneumonia zero” program. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(2):181–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Montero JG, Lerma FÁ, Galleymore PR, Scientific Expert Committee for Zero Resistance Project, et al. Combatting resistance in intensive care: the multimodal approach of the Spanish ICU “zero resistance” program. Crit Care. 2015;19:114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis campaign: international guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Foster MJ, Gary JC, Sooryanarayana SM. Direct observation of medication errors in critical care setting: a systematic review. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2018;41(1):76–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Merino P, Martin MC, Alonso A, Guitierrez I, Alvarez J, Becerril F. Errores de medicación en los servicios de Medicina Intensiva españoles. Med Intensiva. 2013;37(6):391–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kane-Gill SL, Dasta JF, Buckley MS, et al. Clinical practice guideline: safe medication use in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(9):e877–915.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Preslaski CR, Lat I, MacLaren R, Poston J. Pharmacist contributions as members of the multidisciplinary ICU team. Chest. 2013;144(5):1687–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    García-Olivares P, Guerrero JE, Galdos P, Carriedo D, Murillo F, Rivera A. PROF-ETEV study: prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic disease in critical care units in Spain. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(11):1698–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Buendegens L, BueKoch A, Tacke F. Prevention of stress-related ulcer bleeding at the intensive care unit: risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis. World L Crit Care Med. 2016;5(1):57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Keller BP, Wille J, van Ramshorst B, van der Werken C. Pressure ulcers in intensive care patients: a review of risks and prevention. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1379–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bleijlevens MH, Wagner LM, Capezuti E, Hamers JP, The International Physical Restraint Workgroup. Physical restraints: consensus of a research definition using a modified Delphi technique. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Breimaier HE, Halfens RJ, Lohrmann C. Effectiveness of multifaceted and tailored strategies to implement a fall-prevention guideline into acute care nursing practice: a before-and-after, mixed-method study using a participatory action research approach. BMC Nurs. 2015;31:14–8.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Despins LA. Patient safety and collaboration of the intensive care unit team. Crit Care Nurse. 2009;29:85–91. [PubMed: 19339450].PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Donovan AL, Aldrich JM, Gross AK, et al. Interprofessional care and teamwork in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(6):980–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sirgo G, Chico M, Gordo F, et al. Traspaso de información en Medicina Intensiva. Med Intensiva. 2018;42(3):168–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ten Have EC, Nap RE, Tulleken JE. Quality improvement of interdisciplinary rounds by leadership training based on essential quality indicators of the interdisciplinary rounds assessment scale. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(10):1800–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Martín Delgado MC, Gordo Vidal F. Perioperative intensive care medicine. Med Intensiva. 2019;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2019.03.011. pii: S0210-5691(19)30121-4. [Epub ahead of print]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 2012;22:1059–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Expert Round Table on Ultrasound in ICU. International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(7):1077–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kleinpell R, Sessler CN, Wiencek C, Moss M. Choosing wisely in critical care: results of a national survey from the critical care societies collaborative. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(3):331–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hernández-Tejedor A, Peñuelas O, Sirgo Rodríguez G, et al. Recommendations of the working groups from the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) for the management of adult critically ill patients. Med Intensiva. 2017;41(5):285–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    McGaughey J, O’Halloran P, Porter S, Blackwood B. Early warning systems and rapid response to the deteriorating patient in hospital: A systematic realist review. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(12):2877–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gordo F, Molina R. Evolution to the early detection of severity. Where are we going? Med Intensiva. 2018;42(1):47–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pun BT, Balas MC, Barnes-Daly MA, et al. Caring for critically ill patients with the ABCDEF bundle: results of the ICU liberation collaborative in over 15,000 adults. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(1):3–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rosa RG, Tonietto TF, da Silva DB, et al. Effectiveness and safety of an extended ICU visitation model for delirium prevention: a before and after study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(10):1660–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Garrouste-Orgeas M, Flaatten H, Moreno R. Understanding medical errors and adverse events in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:107–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mathews KS, Nelson JE. Palliative care in the ICU of 2050: past is prologue. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(12):1850–2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dhawan I, Kapoor PM, Choudhury A. Simulation in critical care. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016;19(3):537–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kendall-Gallagher D, Blegen MA. Competence and certification of registered nurses and safety of patients in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care. 2009;18(2):106–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bailly S, Meyfroidt G, Timsit JF. What’s new in ICU in 2050: big data and machine learning. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(9):1524–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rhodes A, Moreno RP, Azoulay E, Task Force on Safety and Quality of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), et al. Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the task force on safety and quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(4):598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bodí M, Oliva I, Martín MC, Gilavert MC, Muñoz C, Olona M, Sirgo G. Impact of random safety analyses on structure, process and outcome indicators: multicentre study. Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7(1):23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0245-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Joint Comisión on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook Illinois: JCHO 2004.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Martín-Delgado MC, Fernández-Maillo M, Bañeres-Amella J, et al. Consensus conference on providing information of adverse events to patients and relatives. Rev Calid Asist. 2013;28(6):381–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    O’Connor E, Coates HM, Yardley IE, et al. Disclosure of patient safety incidents: a comprehensive review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22:371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Un proyecto de la Fundación ABIN, la Fundación ACPASIM y la Federación Europea de Medicina Interna. La profesión médica en el nuevo milenio: estatutos para la regulación de la práctica médica. Med Clínica (Barc). 2002;118:704–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Cleopas A, Villaveces A, Charvet A, Bovier PA, Kolly V, Perneger TV. Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:136–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Helmchen LA, Richards MR, McDonald TB. How does routine disclosure of medical error affect patients’ propensity to sue and their assessment of provider quality? Evidence from survey data. Med Care. 2010;48:955–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wojcieszac D. Sorry works: disclosure, apology and relationships prevent medical malpractice. Bloomington: AuthorHouse; 2007.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Garbutt J, Brownstein DR, Klein EJ, et al. Reporting and disclosing medical errors: pediatricians’ attitudes and behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:179–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gallagher TH, Garbutt JM, Waterman AD, et al. Choosing your words carefully: how physicians would disclose harmful medical errors to patients. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1585–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, Fraser VJ, Levinson W. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA. 2003;289:1001–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Manser T, Staender S. Aftermath of an adverse event: supporting health care professionals to meet patient expectations through open disclosure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:728–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bark P, Vincent C, Olivieri L, Jones A. Impact of litigation on senior clinicians: implications for risk management. Qual Health Care. 1997;6:7–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Aasland OG, Førde R. Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors’ personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:13–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kaldjian LC, Forman-Hoffman VL, Jones EW, Wu BJ, Levi BH, Rosenthal GE. Do faculty and resident physicians discuss their medical errors? J Med Ethics. 2008;34:717–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kaldjian LC, Jones EW, Wu BJ, Forman-Hoffman VL, Levi BH, Rosenthal GE. Disclosing medical errors to patients: attitudes and practices of physicians and trainees. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:988–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kaldjian LC, Jones EW, Rosenthal GE. Facilitating and impeding factors for physicians’ error disclosure: a structured literature review. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:188–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, Fraser VJ, Levinson W. Patient’s and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA. 2003;289:1001–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    White AA, Gallagher TH, Krauss MJ, et al. The attitudes and experiences of trainees regarding disclosing medical errors to patients. Acad Med. 2008;83:25–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Stroud L, McIlroy J, Levinson W. Skills of internal medicine residents in disclosing medical errors: a study using standardized patients. Acad Med. 2009;84:1803–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Vincent JL. European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16:256–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Iedema RA, Mallock NA, Sorensen RJ, et al. The National Open Disclosure Pilot: evaluation of a policy implementation initiative. Med J Aust. 2008;188:397–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Studdert RM. Legal aspects of open disclosure: a review of Australian law. Med J Aust. 2010;193:273–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mastroianni AC, Mello MM, Sommer S, Hardy M, Gallagher TH. The flaws in state ‘apology’ and ‘disclosure’ laws dilute. Their intended impact on malpractice suits. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1611–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Saitta N, Hodge SD. Efficacy of a physician’s words of empathy: an overview of state apology laws. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012;112(5):302–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Barraclough BH, Birch J. Health care safety and quality: where have we been and where are we going? Med J Aust. 2006;184(Suppl 10):S48–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kachalia A, Shojania KG, Hofer TP, Piotrowski M, Saint S. Does full disclosure of medical errors affect malpractice liability? The jury is still out. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29:503–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, et al. Liability claims and costs before and alter implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:213–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):726–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, McCoig M, Brandt J, Hall LW. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider “second victim” after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(5):325–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Edrees HH, Paine LA, Feroli ER, Wu AW. Health care workers as second victims of medical errors. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2011;121:101–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Clarkson MD, Haskell H, Hemmelgarn C, Skolnik PJ. Abandon the term “second victim”. BMJ. 2019;364:l1233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Seys D, Scott SD, Wu AW, et al. Supporting involved health care professionals (second victims) following an adverse health event: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:678–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Gómez-Durán EL, Vizcaíno-Rakosnik M, Martin-Fumadó C, Klamburg J, Padrós-Selma J, Arimany-Manso J. Physicians as second victims after a malpractice claim: an important issue in need of attention. J Healthc Qual Res. 2018;33(5):284–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Conway J, Federico F, Stewart K, Campbell M. Respectful management of serious clinical adverse events. IHI innovation series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2011. www.IHI.org.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Scott SD. Three-tiered Emotional Support System generates positive feedback from providers who become “Second Victims” of an unanticipated clinical event. AHRQ Health Care Innovations Exchange. 2010. https://innovations.ahrq.gov/profiles/three-tiered-emotional-support-system-generates-positive-feedback-providers-who-become
  101. 101.
    Burlison JD, Scott SD, Browne EK, Thompson SG, Hoffman JM. The second victim experience and support tool: validation of an organizational resource for assessing second victim effects and the quality of support resources. J Patient Saf. 2014;13(2):93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Scott S, Hirschinger L, Cox K, McCoig M, Brand J, Hall LW. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider second victim after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:325–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Cruz Martín Delgado
    • 1
  1. 1.University Hospital of TorrejónUniversidad Francisco de VitoriaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations