Advertisement

The Place of the State in Phenomenological Reflection

  • Mariano CrespoEmail author
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 110)

Abstract

This chapter presents the preliminary results of a double task: on the one hand, I try to identify the place of the notion of “state” in the phenomenological thinking of Edmund Husserl and, on the other hand, I reflect on a particular question in the general frame of the connections between state and law, namely, the general problem of the relationships between positive law, as formulated by the state’s legislative power, and so called a priori law (Adolf Reinach) or pure law (Edith Stein), understood as law that precedes and underlies positive law. Both Reinach and Stein defend the existence of pre-positive elements. Thus, they agree with classical theories of natural law; however, they distance themselves from such theories through a criticism I consider not sufficiently justified. In other words, the similarities between Reinach’s and Stein’s theories and classical theories of natural law are closer than usually thought.

Keywords

State Phenomenology Husserl Stein Reinach Natural law a priori law Positive law 

References

  1. Asquini, A. 1965. La natura dei fatti como fonte di diritto. Arch. Giur., LXXVI, 1921, 129–167, cited by Bobbio, N., in “Über den Begriff der ‘Natur der Sache’” in: Kaufmann, A. (Ed.), Die ontologische Begründung des Rechts, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 87–103.Google Scholar
  2. DuBois, J. 1995. Judgment and Sachverhalt: An Introduction to Adolf Reinach’s Phenomenological Realism. In Phaenomenologica. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. González di Pierro, E. 2016. The Influence of Adolf Reinach on Edith Stein’s Concept of the State: Similarities and Differences. In Edith Stein: Women, Social-Political Philosophy, Theology, Metaphysics and Public History. New Approaches and Applications, Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life, ed. Antonio Calcagno. New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Hart, J. 1992. The Person and the Common Life. Studies in a Husserlian Social Ethics. Dordrecht: Springer/Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Husserl, E. 1956. Erste Philosophie (1923/4). Erste Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. Husserliana VII. Ed. Rudolf Boehm. Der Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1970. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Hrsg. von W. Biemel. 2. Auflage, Husserliana, Band VI. Der Haag: Martinus Nijhoff 1976 (The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1973a. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil. 1905–1920, Hua XIII. Ed. Iso Kern. Der Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1973b. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil. 1921–28, Hua XIV, Hrsg. v. Iso Kern. Der Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  9. ———.. 1983. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. 1. Halbband. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Text der 1.-3. Auflage. Hrsg. v. K. Schuhmann, Husserliana III/1. Martinus Nijhoff 1976 (Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Trans. By F. Kersten, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. ———.. 1989. Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV, Hrsg. v. Marly Biemel. Der Haag: Martinus Nijhoff 1952 (Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book. Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Transl. by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2014. Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik (Texte aus dem Nachlass 1908–1937), ed. Hua XLII, Hrsg. v. Rochus Sowa and Thomas Vongehr. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Loidolt, S. 2010. Einführung in die Rechtsphänomenologie. Eine historisch-systematische Darstellung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  13. López, M.C. 1994. Intersubjetividad trascendental y mundo social. Enrahonar 22.Google Scholar
  14. Merleau-Ponty. 1964. In Le visible et l’invisible, ed. Claude Lefort. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. Reinach, A. 1989. Einleitung in die Philosophie. In Sämtliche Werke, Textkritische Ausgabe, ed. Karl Schuhmann and Barry Smith, vol. I. München: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2010. Los fundamentos a priori del Derecho civil. Edición, traducción y estudio preliminar de Mariano Crespo, Comares, Granada.Google Scholar
  17. Schuhmann, K. 1988. Husserls Staatsphilosophie. Freiburg: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2005. Edith Stein und Adolf Reinach. In Selected Papers on Phenomenology, ed. C. Leijenhorst and P. Steenbakkers. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Stein, E. 1925. Eine Untersuchung über den Staat. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 7.Google Scholar
  20. Steinbock, A.J. 1995. Home and Beyond. Generative Phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Strasser, S. 1975. Grundgedanken der Sozialontologie Edmund Husserls. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung Bd. 29, H. 1 (January–March)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Culture and SocietyUniversity of NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations