Advertisement

A Review on Contemporary Hole Transport Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells

  • Saikumar Nair
  • Jignasa V. GohelEmail author
Chapter
  • 98 Downloads
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

The present review article is focussed on different types of hole-transporting materials (HTMs) under research over the past few years in the perovskite-based solar cell (PSC) in achieving the goal of higher power conversion efficiency (PCE) and operational stability. There has been a growth spurt of efficiency from 3.8 to 22.1% in the last decade which has attracted researchers and the renewable industry. HTMs are an indispensable part of PSC which affects both efficiency and stability. An overview of different types of HTMs (organic, inorganic, and polymeric) is presented detailing its structure, electrochemical, and physical properties, while highlighting several considerations for making a choice for a new HTM for PSC. The recent progress is shown with PSC’s device architecture, fabrication technique and their respective JV characteristics to help readers understand the challenges surrounding HTM and opportunities to make it highly efficient and stable.

Keywords

Perovskite solar cells Hole transport materials Charge carriers Methylammonium lead iodide 

References

  1. Abbas HA, Kottokkaran R, Ganapathy B, et al (2015) High efficiency sequentially vapor grown n-i-p CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells with undoped P3HT as p-type heterojunction layer. APL Mater 3.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905932
  2. Abrusci A, Stranks SD, Docampo P et al (2013) High-performance perovskite-polymer hybrid solar cells via electronic coupling with fullerene monolayers. Nano Lett 13:3124–3128.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401044qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agresti A, Pescetelli S, Taheri B et al (2016) Graphene-perovskite solar cells exceed 18% efficiency: a stability study. Chemsuschem 9:2609–2619.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kojima Akihiro, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T (2009) Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible- Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J Am Chem Soc 131:6050–6051.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja809598rCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aristidou N, Sanchez-Molina I, Chotchuangchutchaval T et al (2015) The role of oxygen in the degradation of methylammonium lead trihalide perovskite photoactive layers. Angew Chemie Int Ed 54:8208–8212.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201503153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bi C, Wang Q, Shao Y et al (2015) Non-wetting surface-driven high-aspect-ratio crystalline grain growth for efficient hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat Commun 6:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burschka J, Pellet N, Moon SJ et al (2013) Sequential deposition as a route to high- performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499:316–319.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chavhan S, Miguel O, Grande H-J et al (2014) Organo-metal halide perovskite-based solar cells with CuSCN as the inorganic hole selective contact. J Mater Chem A 2:12754–12760.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA01310GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiang C-H, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M, Wu C-G (2017) The synergistic effect of H2O and DMF towards stable and 20% efficiency inverted perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 10:808–817.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE03586HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi H, Park S, Paek S et al (2014) Efficient star-shaped hole transporting materials with diphenylethenyl side arms for an efficient perovskite solar cell. J Mater Chem A 2:19136–19140.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA04179HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christians JA, Fung RCM, Kamat PV (2014) An inorganic hole conductor for Organo-lead halide perovskite solar cells. improved hole conductivity with copper iodide. J Am Chem Soc 136:758–764.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja411014kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conings B, Drijkoningen J, Gauquelin N et al (2015) Intrinsic thermal instability of methylammonium lead trihalide perovskite. Adv Energy Mater 5:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daskeviciene M, Paek S, Wang Z et al (2017) Carbazole-based enamine: low-cost and efficient hole transporting material for perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 32:551–557.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Do Sung S, Kang MS, Choi IT et al (2014) 14.8% Perovskite solar cells employing carbazole derivatives as hole transporting materials. Chem Commun 50:14161–14163.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC06716ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Do K, Choi H, Lim K et al (2014) Star-shaped hole transporting materials with a triazine unit for efficient perovskite solar cells. Chem Commun 50:10971–10974.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CC04550ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Economist T (2018) A new type of solar cell is coming to market. Economist. https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21736122-perovskites-have-potential-outshine-silicon-solar-panels-new-type. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
  17. Gharibzadeh S, Nejand BA, Moshaii A et al (2016) Two-step physical deposition of a compact cui hole-transport layer and the formation of an interfacial species in perovskite solar cells. Chemsuschem 9:1929–1937.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gratia P, Magomedov A, Malinauskas T et al (2015) A Methoxydiphenylamine- substituted carbazole twin derivative: an efficient hole-transporting material for perovskite solar cells. Angew Chemie Int Ed 54:11409–11413.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201504666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Habisreutinger SN, Leijtens T, Eperon GE et al (2014) Carbon nanotube/polymer composites as a highly stable hole collection layer in perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett 14:5561–5568.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501982bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han Y, Meyer S, Dkhissi Y et al (2015) Degradation observations of encapsulated planar CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells at high temperatures and humidity. J Mater Chem A 3:8139–8147.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00358JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heo JH, Im SH, Noh JH et al (2013) Efficient inorganic-organic hybrid heterojunction solar cells containing perovskite compound and polymeric hole conductors. Nat Photonics 7:486–491.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heo JH, Han HJ, Kim D et al (2015) Hysteresis-less inverted CH3NH3PbI3 planar perovskite hybrid solar cells with 18.1% power conversion efficiency. Energy Environ Sci 8:1602–1608.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE00120JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. He J, Xiang Y, Zhang F et al (2018) Improvement of red light harvesting ability and open circuit voltage of Cu:NiOx based p-i-n planar perovskite solar cells boosted by cysteine enhanced interface contact. Nano Energy 45:471–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu WD, Dall’Agnesel C, Wang XF, et al (2018) Copper iodide-PEDOT:PSS double hole transport layers for improved efficiency and stability in perovskite solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol Chem 357:36–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.02.018
  25. Hu Z, Chen D, Yang P, et al (2018) Sol-gel-processed yttrium-doped NiO as hole transport layer in inverted perovskite solar cells for enhanced performance. Appl Surf Sci 441:258–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.236
  26. Jeng JY, Chiang YF, Lee MH et al (2013) CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite/fullerene planar- heterojunction hybrid solar cells. Adv Mater 25:3727–3732.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeon NJ, Lee J, Noh JH et al (2013) Efficient inorganic-organic hybrid perovskite solar cells based on pyrene arylamine derivatives as hole-transporting materials. J Am Chem Soc 135:19087–19090.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja410659kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeon NJ, Lee HG, Kim YC et al (2014) O-methoxy substituents in spiro-OMeTAD for efficient inorganic-organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 136:7837–7840.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja502824cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jung JW, Chueh CC, Jen AKY (2015) A low-temperature, solution-processable, Cu- Doped Nickel Oxide hole-transporting layer via the combustion method for high- performance thin-film perovskite solar cells. Adv Mater 27:7874–7880.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim HS, Lee CR, Im JH et al (2012) Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci Rep 2:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim JH, Liang PW, Williams ST et al (2015) High-performance and environmentally stable planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells based on a solution-processed copper- doped nickel oxide hole-transporting layer. Adv Mater 27:695–701.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201404189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krishna A, Sabba D, Li H et al (2014) Novel hole transporting materials based on triptycene core for high efficiency mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. Chem Sci 5:2702–2709.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SC00814FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumari N, Patel SR, Gohel JV (2018) Current progress and future prospective of perovskite solar cells: a comprehensive review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 53:161–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumari N, Patel SR, Gohel JV (2019) Superior efficiency achievement for FAPbI3- perovskite thin film solar cell by optimization with response surface methodology technique and partial replacement of Pb by Sn. Optik (Stuttg) 176:262–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kundu S, Kelly TL (2018) Improving the moisture stability of perovskite solar cells by using PMMA/P3HT based hole-transport layers. Mater Chem Front 2:81–89.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7QM00396JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee MM, Teuscher J, Miyasaka T et al (2012) Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso- superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 338:643–647.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228604
  37. Leijtens T, Ding I-K, Giovenzana T et al (2012) Hole transport materials with low glass transition temperatures and high solubility for application in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 6:1455–1462.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn204296bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li H, Fu K, Hagfeldt A et al (2014a) A simple 3, 4-Ethylenedioxythiophene based hole-transporting material for perovskite solar cells. Angew Chemie Int Ed 53:4085–4088.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201310877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li H, Fu K, Boix PP et al (2014b) Hole-transporting small molecules based on thiophene cores for high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Chemsuschem 7:3420–3425.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201402587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li W, Dong H, Guo X et al (2014) Graphene oxide as dual functional interface modifier for improving wettability and retarding recombination in hybrid perovskite solar cells. J Mater Chem A 2:20105–20111.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA05196CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li X, Bi D, Yi C et al (2016) A vacuum flash assisted solution process for high-efficiency large-area perovskite solar cells. Science 80(8060):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8060
  42. Lv S, Song Y, Xiao J et al (2015) Simple triphenylamine-based hole-transporting materials for perovskite solar cells. Electrochim Acta 182:733–741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Misra RK, Aharon S, Li B et al (2015) Temperature- and component-dependent degradation of perovskite photovoltaic materials under concentrated sunlight. J Phys Chem Lett 6:326–330.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502642bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NREL (2018) NREL efficiency chart for solar research cells. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/images/efficiency-chart.png. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
  45. Park S, Heo JH, Yun JH et al (2016) Effect of multi-armed triphenylamine-based hole transporting materials for high performance perovskite solar cells. Chem Sci 7:5517–5522.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC00876CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patel SB, Gohel JV (2018) Enhanced solar cell performance by optimization of spray coated CZTS thin film using Taguchi and response surface method. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:5613–5623.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8530-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patel SB, Patel AH, Gohel JV (2018) A novel and cost effective CZTS hole transport material applied in perovskite solar cells. CrystEngComm 20:7677–7687.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ce01337cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Qin P, Tanaka S, Ito S et al (2014) Inorganic hole conductor-based lead halide perovskite solar cells with 12.4% conversion efficiency. Nat Commun 5:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Senocrate A, Yang TY, Gregori G et al (2018) Charge carrier chemistry in methylammonium lead iodide. Solid State Ionics 321:69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2018.03.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snaith HJ, Grätzel M (2006) Enhanced charge mobility in a molecular hole transporter via addition of redox inactive ionic dopant: Implication to dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 89Google Scholar
  51. Sun W, Ye S, Rao H et al (2016) Room-temperature and solution-processed copper iodide as the hole transport layer for inverted planar perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale 8:15954–15960.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR04288KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang H, Yu Z, Jiang X et al (2017) Efficient and stable inverted planar perovskite solar cells employing CuI as hole-transporting layer prepared by solid-gas transformation. Energy Technol 5:1836–1843.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201700422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu Z, Bai S, Xiang J et al (2014) Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells employing graphene oxide as hole conductor. Nanoscale 6:10505–10510.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR03181DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xiao J, Shi J, Liu H, et al (2015) Efficient CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells based on graphdiyne (GD)-modified P3HT Hole-transporting material. Adv Energy Mater 5:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201401943
  55. Yang IS, Sohn MR, Do Sung S et al (2017) Formation of pristine CuSCN layer by spray deposition method for efficient perovskite solar cell with extended stability. Nano Energy 32:414–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ye S, Sun W, Li Y et al (2015) CuSCN-based inverted planar perovskite solar cell with an average PCE of 15.6%. Nano Lett 15:3723–3728.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang F, Yi C, Wei P et al (2016) A novel dopant-free triphenylamine based molecular “Butterfly” hole-transport material for highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 6:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang MD, Zhao DX, Chen L et al (2018) Structure-performance relationship on the asymmetric methoxy substituents of spiro-OMeTAD for perovskite solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 176:318–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu Z, Bai Y, Zhang T et al (2014) High-performance hole-extraction layer of sol-gel- processed nio nanocrystals for inverted planar perovskite solar cells. Angew Chemie Int Ed 53:12571–12575.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201405176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringSardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations