Advertisement

Activities and Challenges in the Planning Phase of a Software Ecosystem

  • Kati SaarniEmail author
  • Marjo Kauppinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 370)

Abstract

Increasing competition forces companies to find new business opportunities by building business ecosystems together. The business ecosystem, where a set of companies develop and provide digital services together for a specific customer segment, can be referred to as a software ecosystem. The planning of ecosystems has been researched in some case studies, but more comprehensive knowledge on how to start building software ecosystems is still needed. The goal of this case study was to investigate activities and challenges in the planning phase of a Finnish software ecosystem. The case study was conducted by interviewing representatives of all six actors of the ecosystem and analyzing the material of the 12 planning workshops. The definition of a vision and objectives, the selection of actors, and the definition of a governance model were the main activities of the planning phase. It was also essential that the actors of the software ecosystem started the conceptualization of digital services and the definition of the business model together. One of the main challenges was that a clear strategy was not defined at the beginning of the planning phase. Furthermore, trust-building between the actors, different decision-making capabilities and a lack of the substance knowledge slowed down the planning phase. The actors also felt that much stronger leadership was needed.

Keywords

Software ecosystem Digital service Challenge Activity Planning 

References

  1. 1.
    Bosch, J., Bosch-Sijtsema, P.: From integration to composition: on the impact of software product lines, global development and ecosystems. J. Syst. Software 83(1), 67–76 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyce, C., Neale, P.: Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. In: Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation, vol. 2, 16 p. (2006). http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=6301
  3. 3.
    Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, p. 208. Sage Publications, London (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Das, T.K., Teng, B.-S.: Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23(3), 491–512 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S., Ortt, R.J.: Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: a literature review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 136, 18–29 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cusumano, M.A., Gawer, A.: The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 43(3), 50–58 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanssen, G.K.A.: Longitudinal case study of an emerging software ecosystem: implications for practice and theory. J. Syst. Software 85(7), 1455–1466 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holmström Olsson, H., Bosch, J.: Strategic ecosystem management: a multi-case study in the B2B domain. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES), vol. 9459, pp. 3–15 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability, p. 304. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkelstein, A.:. Business network management as a survival strategy: a tale of two software ecosystems. In: 1st International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, IWSECO, vol. 505, pp. 34–48 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jansen, S., Cusumano, M.A.: Defining software ecosystems: a survey of software platforms and business network governance. In: 4th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, IWSECO, vol. 879, pp. 40–58 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knodel, J. and Manikas, K.: Towards a typification of software ecosystems. In: 6th International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB), vol. 210, pp. 60–65 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lenkenhoff, K., Wilkens, U., Zheng, M., Süße, T., Kuhlenkötter, B., Ming, X.: Key challenges of digital business ecosystem development and how to cope with them. In: 10th Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems, Procedia CIRP, vol. 73, pp. 167–172 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manikas, K., Hansen, K.M.: Software ecosystems – a systematic literature re-view. J. Syst. Software 86(5), 1294–1306 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manikas, K.: Revisiting software ecosystems research: a longitudinal literature study. J. Syst. Software 117, 84–103 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Markham, S.K., Ward, S.J., Aiman-Smith, L., Kingon, A.I.: The valley of death as context for role theory in product innovation. J. Product Innov. Manage. 27(3), 402–417 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moore, J.F.: Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3), 75–86 (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moore, J.F.: The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, p. 297. HarperBusiness, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mukhopadhyay, S., Bouwman, H.: Multi-actor collaboration in platform-based ecosystem: opportunities and challenges. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 20(2), 47–54 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pichlis, D., Raatikainen, M., Sevón, P., Hofemann, S., Myllärniemi, V., Komssi, M.: The challenges of joint solution planning: three software ecosystem cases. In: Jedlitschka, A., Kuvaja, P., Kuhrmann, M., Männistö, T., Münch, J., Raatikainen, M. (eds.) PROFES 2014. LNCS, vol. 8892, pp. 310–313. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rong, K., Shi, Y.: Business Ecosystems – Constructs, Configurations and the Nurturing Process, 263 p. Palgrave Macmillan (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scaringella, L., Radziwon, A.: Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: old wine in new bottles? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 136, 59–87 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schultis, K-B., Elsner, C. and Lohmann, D.: Architecture challenges for internal software ecosystems: a large-scale industry case study. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 542–552 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Valenca, G., Alves, C., Heimann, V., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Competition and collaboration in requirements engineering: A case study of an emerging software ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 384–393 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valkokari, K., Seppänen, M., Mäntylä, M., Jylhä-Ollila, S.: Orchestrating innovation ecosystems: a qualitative analysis of ecosystem positioning strategies. Technol. Innovat. Manage. Rev. 7(3), 12–24 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Third Edition. Sage Publications, Applied Social Research Methods, vol. 5, 179 p. (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations