Advertisement

Organizational Innovativeness Relies on Business and IT Alignment

  • Zornitsa YordanovaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 370)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to empirically research what is the interconnection between the efforts of business organizations to manage their organizational innovativeness and using management information systems in their management and operations. The organizational innovativeness in the study is narrowed by the prism of innovative potential and innovative capabilities that are defined by the Company Innovative Leadership model. The scope of IT when it comes to business and IT alignment is seen from the usage of ERP, CRM and BI systems for information and process management of operations. These three management information systems act as tools for Business and IT Alignment in the study. The methodology employed in the study relied on 51 middle and high level management respondents who explained what are the possible linkages between innovation goals of organizations and application of information and process information systems. The key findings of the results are concrete identified aspects of organizational innovativeness that may rely on information and process information systems. The practical implication of the study is its possible use as a high-level tool for organizations on how to approach and to address their organizational innovativeness by the already used systems.

Keywords

Innovation management Organizational innovativeness MIS ERP CRM BI 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The paper is supported by the BG NSF Grant No M 15/4 -2017 (DM 15/1), KP-06 OPR01/3-2018, and NID NI 14/2018

References

  1. 1.
    Tidd, J., Bessant, J.: Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Wiley, West Sussex (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crossan, M.M., Apaydin, M.: A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J. Manag. Stud. 47(6), 1154–1191 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruce, T.C., Packard, J.: Organizational innovation. In: Yamane, D. (ed.) Handbook of Religion and Society. HSSR, pp. 155–175. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31395-5_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Subramanian, A., Nilakanta, S.: Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega 24(6), 631–647 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamaruddeen, A., Yusof, N., Said, I.: Innovation and innovativeness: difference and antecedent relationship. IUP J. Architect. II(1), 12 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, C.L., Ahmed, P.: The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 4(7), 303–313 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foxall, G.: Corporate Innovation: Marketing and Strategy. St. Martin’s Press, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. The Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G.G.: Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21(1), 135–172 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blagoev, D., Yordanova, Z.: Company innovative leadership model. Econ. Altern. 2, 5–13 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yordanova, Z., Blagoev, D.: Measuring the Bulgarian IT sector innovations capabilities through company innovative leadership model. Econ. Altern. 3, 379–393 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of National and World EconomySofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations