Advertisement

Amidst Uncertainty – or Not? Decision-Making in Early-Stage Software Startups

  • Kai-Kristian KemellEmail author
  • Eveliina Ventilä
  • Petri Kettunen
  • Tommi Mikkonen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 370)

Abstract

It is commonly claimed that the initial stages of any startup business are dominated by continuous, extended uncertainty, in an environment that has even been described as chaotic. Consequently, decisions are made in uncertain circumstances, so making the right decision is crucial to successful business. However, little currently exists in the way of empirical studies into this supposed uncertainty. In this paper, we study decision-making in early-stage software startups by means of a single, in-depth case study. Based on our data, we argue that software startups do not work in a chaotic environment, nor are they characterized by unique uncertainty unlike that experienced by other firms.

Keywords

Software startups Entrepreneurship Decision-making Cynefin framework In-depth case study 

References

  1. 1.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Brown, S.L.: Time pacing: competing in markets that won’t stand still. Harv. Bus. Rev. 76, 59–70 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klotins, E.: Software start-ups through an empirical lens: are start-ups snowflakes? In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software-intensive Business: Start-Ups, Ecosystems and Platforms (SiBW) (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klotins, E., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T.: Software engineering antipatterns in start-ups. IEEE Softw. 36, 118–126 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krisnan, V., Ulrich, K.T.: Product development decisions: a review of the literature. Manag. Sci. 47(1), 1–21 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.J.: The new dynamics of strategy: Sensemaking in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst. J. 42(3), 462–483 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen-Duc, A., Seppänen, P., Abrahamsson, P.: Hunter-Gatherer cycle: a conceptual model of the evolution of software startups. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 199–203 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: Software development in startup companies: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56, 1200–1218 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seppänen, Pertti, Liukkunen, Kari, Oivo, Markku: Little big team: acquiring human capital in software startups. In: Felderer, Michael, Méndez Fernández, Daniel, Turhan, Burak, Kalinowski, Marcos, Sarro, Federica, Winkler, Dietmar (eds.) PROFES 2017. LNCS, vol. 10611, pp. 280–296. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Unterkalmsteiner, M., et al.: Software startups – a research agenda. e-Informatica Softw. Eng. J. 10(1), 89–123 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, X., Edison, H., Bajwa, S.S., Giardino, C., Abrahamsson, P.: Key challenges in software startups across life cycle stages. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Agile Software Development, pp. 169–182, May 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, J.: The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: evidence from serial entrepreneurs. Small Bus. Econ. 36(2), 187–208 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations