Improving a Startup Learning Framework Through an Expert Panel

  • Rafael ChaninEmail author
  • Afonso Sales
  • Leandro Pompermaier
  • Rafael Prikladnicki
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 370)


It is not easy to provide real-world experience to students in an academic setting. When it comes to the development of a software startup, the connection with real users and customers is a must; otherwise, it becomes just a technical challenge. Furthermore, universities and the academic environment are paying more attention to this topic in the past years. One interesting work developed in this regard is the Challenge Based Startup Learning. In this sense, this paper aims at exploring, studying, and extending the Challenge Based Startup Learning Framework by running an expert panel. The idea behind this approach is to collect useful feedback in order to improve the framework to provide student with a better software startup development experience.


Challenge Based Startup Learning Challenge Based Learning Startup education Entrepreneurship education 



This work is partially funded by FAPERGS (17/2551-0001/205-4).


  1. 1.
    Beecham, S., Hall, T., Britton, C., Cottee, M., Rainer, A.: Using an expert panel to validate a requirements process improvement model. J. Syst. Softw. 76(3), 251–275 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blank, S.: The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products That Win. K&S Ranch Incorporated, Pescadero (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blank, S., Dorf, B.: The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-step Guide for Building a Great Company. K&S Ranch Incorporated, Pescadero (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Case, S., Coleman, M., Deshpande, G.: The innovative and entrepreneurial university: Higher education, innovation and entrepreneurship in focus. US Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Washington, DC (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chanin, R., et al.: Software startup education around the world: a preliminary analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software-intensive Business: Start-ups, Ecosystems and Platforms (SiBW 2018), Espoo, Finland, 3 December 2018, pp. 219–229 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chanin, R., Sales, A., Pompermaier, L., Prikladnicki, R.: Challenge based startup learning: a framework to teach software startup. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018, pp. 266–271. ACM, New York (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chanin, R., Sales, A., Pompermaier, L.B., Prikladnicki, R.: A systematic mapping study on software startups education. In: EASE, pp. 163–168 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coleman, G.: An empirical study of software process in practice. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 315c 1–6. IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, January 2005Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elliott, J., Heesterbeek, S., Lukensmeyer, C.J., Slocum, N.: Participatory methods toolkit: A practitioner’s manual. King Baudouin Foundation and the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment (viWTA) (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giardino, C., Paternoster, N., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: Software development in startup companies: the greenfield startup model. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 42(6), 585–604 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Paternoster, N., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: What do we know about software development in startups? IEEE Softw. 31(5), 28–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giardino, C., Wang, X., Abrahamsson, P.: Why early-stage software startups fail: a behavioral framework. In: Lassenius, C., Smolander, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2014. LNBIP, vol. 182, pp. 27–41. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kajko-Mattsson, M., Nikitina, N.: From knowing nothing to knowing a little: experiences gained from process improvement in a start-up company. In: International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, CSSE 2008, pp. 617–621, Wuhan, China, December 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maurya, A.: Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melegati, J., Chanin, R., Wang, X., Sales, A., Prikladnicki, R.: Perceived benefits and challenges of learning startup methodologies for software engineering students. In: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, February 27–March 02 2019, pp. 204–210 (2019)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nguyen-Duc, A., Seppänen, P., Abrahamsson, P.: Hunter-gatherer cycle: a conceptual model of the evolution of software startups. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, Tallinn, Estonia, ICSSP 2015, pp. 199–203, August 2015Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nichols, M., Cator, K., Torres, M.: Challenge Based Learning Guide, Redwood City, CA, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: Software development in startup companies: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(10), 1200–1218 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porter, J., Morgan, J., Lester, R., Steele, A., Vanegas, J., Hill, R.: A course in innovative product design: a collaboration between architecture, business, and engineering. In: Proceedings of 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–5. IEEE Computer Society, El Paso, October 2015Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Business (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shepperd, M., Cartwright, M.: Predicting with sparse data. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27(11), 987–998 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of TechnologyPUCRSPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations