Advertisement

Intertwined Development of Business Model and Product Functions for Mobile Applications: A Twin Peak Feature Modeling Approach

  • Sebastian GottschalkEmail author
  • Florian Rittmeier
  • Gregor Engels
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 370)

Abstract

Mobile app stores like Apple’s AppStore or Google’s PlayStore are highly competitive markets for third-party developers wanting to develop successful applications. During the development process, many developers focus on the multitude of product functions but neglect the business model as an equally important part. As a result, developers often fail to meet customer needs, leading to unnecessary development costs and poor market penetration. This, in turn, raises the question of how we intertwine the business model and product functions during the development process to ensure a better alignment between the two.

In this paper, we show this intertwined development by adapting the concept of Twin Peaks to the business model and product functions. Based on feature modeling as an abstraction layer, we introduce the concept of a Business Model Decision Line (BMDL) to structure the business model decisions and their relation to product functions structured in a Software Product Line (SPL). The basis of our feature models is the analysis of top listed applications in the app stores of Apple and Google. To create and modify both models, we provide an incremental feature structuring and iterative feature selection process. This combination of abstraction layer and development process supports third-party developers to build successful applications both from a business and a product perspective.

Keywords

Intertwined development Twin peaks Feature model Business model Product functions 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed, F., Capretz, L.F.: Managing the business of software product line: an empirical investigation of key business factors. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(2), 194–208 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2006.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    App Annie Inc: The State of Mobile 2019. https://www.appannie.com/en/go/state-of-mobile-2019/
  3. 3.
    Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strat. Leadsh. 35(6), 12–17 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns, 7th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fontao, A.d.L., dos Santos, R.P., Dias-Neto, A.C.: Mobile software ecosystem (MSECO): a systematic mapping study. In: Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMSAC), pp. 653–658. IEEE (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2015.121
  6. 6.
    Gartner Inc: Predicts 2014: Mobile and Wireless. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2620815
  7. 7.
    Gonçalves, V., Walravens, N., Ballon, P.: “How about an App Store?” enablers and constraints in platform strategies for mobile network operators. In: Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business and Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (ICMB-GMR), pp. 66–73. IEEE (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMB-GMR.2010.41
  8. 8.
    Gottschalk, S., Rittmeier, F., Engels, G.: Business models of store-oriented software ecosystems: a variability modeling approach. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2019. LNBIP, vol. 356, pp. 153–169. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24854-3_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gottschalk, S., Rittmeier, F., Engels, G.: Intertwined development of business model and product functions for mobile applications: a twin peak feature modeling approach. Technical report (2019). https://cs.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/informatik/fg/dbis/IntertwiningBMandPF.pdf
  10. 10.
    Holzer, A., Ondrus, J.: Mobile application market: a developer’s perspective. Telemat. Inform. 28(1), 22–31 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2010.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyrynsalmi, S., Suominen, A., Mäkilä, T., Järvi, A., Knuutila, T.: Revenue models of application developers in android market ecosystem. In: Cusumano, M.A., Iyer, B., Venkatraman, N. (eds.) ICSOB 2012. LNBIP, vol. 114, pp. 209–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jansen, S., Bloemendal, E.: Defining app stores: the role of curated marketplaces in software ecosystems. In: Herzwurm, G., Margaria, T. (eds.) ICSOB 2013. LNBIP, vol. 150, pp. 195–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39336-5_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jazayeri, B., Platenius, M.C., Engels, G., Kundisch, D.: Features of IT service markets: a systematic literature review. In: Sheng, Q.Z., Stroulia, E., Tata, S., Bhiri, S. (eds.) ICSOC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9936, pp. 301–316. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46295-0_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krueger, C.W.: Easing the transition to software mass customization. In: van der Linden, F. (ed.) PFE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2290, pp. 282–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47833-7_25CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, S.M., Kim, N.R., Hong, S.G.: Key success factors for mobile app platform activation. Serv. Bus. 11(1), 207–227 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-016-0329-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mannion, M., Savolainen, J.: Aligning product line business and technical strategies. In: 17th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), vol. 6287, pp. 406–419. ACM (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2491627.2493900
  17. 17.
    McGregor, J.D.: The evolution of product line assets. Technical report CMU/SEI-2003-TR-005 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menychtas, A., et al.: 4CaaSt marketplace: an advanced business environment for trading cloud services. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 41, 104–120 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2014.02.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Müller, R.M., Kijl, B., Martens, J.K.J.: A comparison of inter-organizational business models of mobile app stores: there is more than open vs. closed. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 6(2), 13–14 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762011000200007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 336–359 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nuseibeh, B.: Weaving together requirements and architectures. Computer 34(3), 115–119 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1109/2.910904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roma, P., Ragaglia, D.: Revenue models, in-app purchase, and the app performance: evidence from Apple’s App Store and Google Play. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 17, 173–190 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Svahnberg, M., Bosch, J.: Evolution in software product lines: two cases. J. Softw. Maint. Res. Pract. 11, 391–422 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199911/12)11:6<391::AID-SMR199>3.0.CO;2-8
  25. 25.
    Sze Wan, W., Dartane, O., Mohd Satar, N.S., Ma’arif, M.Y.: What WeChat can learn from WhatsApp? Customer value proposition development for mobile social networking (MSN) apps: a case study approach. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 97, 1091–1117 (2019)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tuunainen, V.K., Tuunanen, T., Piispanen, J.: Mobile service platforms: comparing Nokia OVI and apple app store with the IISIn model. In: International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB), pp. 74–83. IEEE (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMB.2011.42
  27. 27.
    van der Linden, F., Schmid, K., Rommes, E.: Software Product Lines in Action. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71437-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu, C., Peak, D., Prybutok, V.: A customer value, satisfaction, and loyalty perspective of mobile application recommendations. Decis. Support. Syst. 79, 171–183 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Gottschalk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Florian Rittmeier
    • 1
  • Gregor Engels
    • 1
  1. 1.Software Innovation LabPaderborn UniversityPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations