Modeling the Dynamics of Knowledge Potential of Agents in the Educational Social and Communication Environment

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1080)


The processes of information processing in the form of knowledge are at the forefront when considering the educational social and communication environment as a holistic system. In this paper, the authors examine the issue of modeling the personal educational (curriculum) program of a person who is studying during all life. The models of information processes for the redistribution of a knowledge potential of agents are created taking into account the units of its components. In particular, a multicomponent two-dimensional array of discrete values has been introduced to characterize procedures for the formation of agents’ professional competencies that are appropriate to their abilities, interests, motivations, psychodynamic and emotional characteristics, age and level of knowledge potential.


Lifelong learning Knowledge potential Competence Agent 


  1. 1.
    New Ukrainian School: Conceptual principles of secondary school reform (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, Z., Liu, B.: Lifelong Machine Learning, p. 127. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fei, G., Wang, S., Liu, B.: Learning cumulatively to become more knowledgeable. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1565–1574 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meijers, F.: A dialogue worth having: vocational competence, career identity and a learning environment for twenty-first century success at work. In: de Bruijn, E., Billett, S., Onstenk, J. (eds.) Enhancing Teaching and Learning in the Dutch Vocational Education System, vol. 18, pp. 139–155. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khetarpal, K., Sodhani, S., Chandar, S., Precup, D.: Environments for lifelong reinforcement learning. In: 2nd Continual Learning Workshop, Neural Information Processing Systems (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Machado, M., Bellemare, M., Talvitie, E., Veness, J., Hausknecht, M., Bowling, M.: Revisiting the arcade learning environment: evaluation protocols and open problems for general agents. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 61, 523–562 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nonaka, I., Krogh, G., Voelpel, S.: Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organ. Stud. 27(8), 1179–1208 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dobrynina, N.: Mathematical models of knowledge dissemination and management of the learning process of students. Sci.Theoret. J. Fundam. Res. 7, 7–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Artemenko, V.: Hybrid of an agent-based knowledge assessment model by distance learning participants. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2, 423–434 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petrash, A.: Methodology of an informative mathematical model for the process. In: Innovative Computer Technology at the School, pp. 128–132 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saviour, A., Mahama, F., Kuadey, N., Ankorah, C.: Mathematical model of knowledge management system in an organization. Global J. Manag. Bus. Res. Adm. Manag. 16 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibatullin, R., Anisimova, E.: Construction of individual educational trajectory of students based on e-learning. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bomba, A., Nazaruk, M., Kunanets, N., Pasichnyk, V.: Constructing the diffusion-like model of biocomponent knowledge potential distribution. Int. J. Comput. 16(2), 74–81 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kunanets, N., Nazaruk, M., Pasichnyk, V., Nebesnyi, R.: Information technologies of personalized choice of professionals in smart cities. Inf. Technol. Learn. Tools 65(3), 277–290 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    About Higher Education: The Law of Ukraine 01.07.2014, 1556-VII (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rashkevych, Yu.: Bologna Process and New Paradigm of Higher Education: Monograph, p. 168 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bomba, A., Safonyk, A.: Mathematical simulation of the process of aerobic treatment of wastewater under conditions of diffusion and mass transfer perturbations. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 91(2), 318–323 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pasichnyk, V., Bomba, A., Nazaruk, M., Kunanets, N., Bilak, Y.: Modeling the redistribution processes of knowledge potential in the formation of the professional competency system. In: IEEE 14th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (2019)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galushkyn, A.: Theory of neural networks: a textbook for universities. Publishing Enterprise of the Radiotekhnika Magazine (2000). 215 p.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flach, P.: Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data, p. 396. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatics and Applied Mathematics DepartmentState Humanitarian UniversityRivneUkraine
  2. 2.Information Systems and Networks DepartmentLviv Polytechnic National UniversityLvivUkraine

Personalised recommendations