- 12 Downloads
This chapter will explore the process of scenario design. Scenario design is perhaps the most important yet difficult phase of implementing a simulation curriculum, regardless of whether that curriculum is delivered in a high-fidelity simulation center or via a mobile training session. Scenarios should be developed using educationally-sound practices, driven by a needs assessment and the learning objectives of the simulation. The choice of formative versus summative assessment will also be determined by the needs of the participants.
While scenario design can be time-consuming, the process can be made more efficient through the use of design templates and storyboards. Design templates ensure that important aspects of a simulation scenario are accounted for as the scenario is being created. Ultimately, if good practices are followed, time spent upfront on scenario design will result in a more robust simulation experience for the participants, more realistic learning experiences, and better educational outcomes.
KeywordsFidelity Realism Storyboard Needs assessment Learning objectives Summative Formative Assessment
International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning
Specific measurable achievable relevant time-bound
- 2.Shemanko GA, Jones L. Chapter 8: to simulate or not to simulate: that is the question. In: Kyle RR, Murray WB, editors. Clinical simulation: operations, engineering and management. New York: Elsevier; 2010. 848 p.Google Scholar
- 4.Schunk DH. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 6th ed. Pearson Education: Harlow; 2014. 576 p.Google Scholar
- 5.Glavin RJ. Chapter 7: when simulation should and should not be in the curriculum. In: Kyle RR, Murray WB, editors. Clinical simulation: operations, engineering and management. New York: Elsevier; 2010. p. 71–6.Google Scholar
- 6.Durham CF, Alden KR. Chapter 51: enhancing patient safety in nursing education through patient simulation. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. p. 1–46.Google Scholar
- 7.Knowles MS. The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. Revised and updated. Englewood Cliffs: Cambridge Adult Education; 1980. 400 p.Google Scholar
- 9.INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: simulationSM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(S):S5–S12.Google Scholar
- 11.California Simulation Alliance. Simulation scenario template 2008 [updated March 2011; cited 2018 Nov 30]. Available from: https://healthimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/CSA-Scenario-Template-4-2011.pdf.
- 12.Bray B. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Human patient simulation scenario development patient case template. 2014 [updated January 31 2014; cited 2018 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.aacp.org/meetingsandevents/AM/Documents/Simulation%20Scenario%20case%20template%206-8-10.pdf.
- 13.Jeffries PR. Simulation in nursing education: from conceptualization to evaluation. 2nd ed. New York: National League for Nursing; 2007. 288 p.Google Scholar
- 14.Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. SAEM Simulation interest group simulation scenario template. 2014 [updated February 2012; cited 2018 Nov 30]. Available from: http://stage.saem.org/sites/default/files/SAEM%20SIG%20scenario%20template%20RIHMSC%20rev%202.8.09.pdf.
- 16.Nayahangan LJ, Stefanidis D, Kern DE, Konge L. How to identify and prioritize procedures suitable for simulation-based training: experiences from general needs assessments using a modified Delphi method and a needs assessment formula. Med Teach. 2018;40(7):676–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives book 1: cognition domain. White Plains: Longman; 1956. 207 p.Google Scholar
- 19.Anderson LW. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston: Pearson Education; 2000. 336 p.Google Scholar
- 21.Popham WJ. Classroom assessment: what teachers need to know. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2018. 448 p.Google Scholar
- 24.Doumouras AG, Keshet I, Nathens AB, Ahmed N, Hicks CM. Trauma non-technical training (TNT-2): the development, piloting and multilevel assessment of a simulation-based, interprofessional curriculum for team-based trauma resuscitation. Can J Surg. 2014;57(5):354–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Welsch LA, Hoch J, Poston RD, Parodi VA, Akpinar-Elci M. Interprofessional education involving didactic TeamSTEPPS and interactive healthcare simulation: a systematic review. J Interprof Care. 2018;14:1–9.Google Scholar
- 27.Garbee DD, Paige J, Barrier K, Kozmenko V, Kozmenko L, Zamjahn J, et al. Interprofessional teamwork among students in simulated codes: a quasi-experimental study. Nurs Educ Perscpect. 2013;34(5):339–44.Google Scholar
- 37.Harden RM, Crosby J. AMEE Guide No 20: the good teacher is more than a lecturer. The twelve roles of the teacher. Med Teach. 2000;24(4):334–47.Google Scholar
- 45.Smith AB, Lammers SE. Chapter 8.5: the ethics of simulation. In: Palaganas JC, Maxmorthy JC, Epps CA, Mancini ME, editors. Defining excellence in simulation programs. Philadelphia: Wolters/Kluwer; 2015. p. 593–603.Google Scholar