Advertisement

Users Intention Based on Twitter Features Using Text Analytics

  • Qadri MishaelEmail author
  • Aladdin Ayesh
  • Iryna Yevseyeva
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11871)

Abstract

Online Social networks are widely used in current times. In this paper, we investigate twitter posts to identify features that feed in intention mining calculation. The posts features are divided into three sets: tweets textual features, users features, and network contextual features. In this paper, our focus is on tweets analysing textual features. As a result of this paper, we were able to create intentions profiles for 2960 users based on textual features. The prediction accuracy of three classifiers was compared for the data set, using ten intention categories to test the features. The best accuracy was achieved for SVM classifier. In the future, we plan to include user and network contextual features aiming at improving the prediction accuracy.

Keywords

Intention mining Online Social Network Feature selection Machine learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Benamara, F., Taboada, M., Mathieu, Y.: Evaluative language beyond bags of words: linguistic insights and computational applications. Comput. Linguist. 43(1), 201–264 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, Z., Liu, B., Hsu, M., Castellanos, M., Ghosh, R.: Identifying intention posts in discussion forums. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, June 2013, pp. 1041–1050 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding, X., Liu, T., Duan, J., Nie, J.Y.: Mining user consumption intention from social media using domain adaptive convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2015), pp. 2389–2395 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Indola, R.P., Ebecken, N.F.F.: On extending F-measure and G-mean metrics to multi-class problems. WIT Trans. Inf. Commun. Technol. 35, 25–34 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, Z.M., Jeong, Y.S., Hyeon, J., Oh, H., Choi, H.J.: Classifying travel-related intents in textual data. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Instrum. Eng. 3(1), 96–101 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Y., Bi, J.W., Fan, Z.P.: Multi-class sentiment classification: the experimental comparisons of feature selection and machine learning algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 80, 323–339 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Purohit, H., Dong, G., Shalin, V., Thirunarayan, K., Sheth, A.: Intent classification of short-text on social media. In: IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity), pp. 222–228 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D.: Sentiment in short strength detection informal text. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 61(12), 2544–2558 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tyshchuk, Y., Wallace, W.A.: Modeling human behavior on social media in response to significant events. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 5(2), 444–457 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and InformaticsDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations