Advertisement

LAC and International Political Economy

  • Alvaro MendezEmail author
  • Mariano Turzi
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter consults international political economy for possible explanations of the Latin American failure to complete membership of the AIIB (with the exception of Ecuador). Four putative mechanisms are proposed and tested: China’s uninterest in Latin American participation; hegemonic impediment by the United States; incompatible interests between Latin America and China in the infrastructure sector or the project investment portfolio; or LAC’s peculiar kind of agency. The chapter demonstrates that structural, external factors cannot account for the delay in ratifying membership, but rather finds the explanation in factors endogenous to the region.

Keywords

AIIB Latin America China International political economy 

References

  1. Arvis, Jean-François, Lauri Ojala, Christina Wiederer, Ben Shepherd, Anasuya Raj, Karlygash Dairabayeva, and Thomas Kiiski. 2018. “Connecting to Compete 2018 Trade Logistics in the Global Economy.” The World Bank (Washington, DC). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/576061531492034646/pdf/128355-WP-P164390-PUBLIC-LPIfullreportwithcover.pdf
  2. Beardsley, Kyle. 2008. “Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time Inconsistency Problems.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4):723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briceño Ruíz, José, and Alejandro Simonoff. 2017. “La Escuela de la Autonomía, América Latina y la teoría de las relaciones internacionales.” Estudios internacionales 49 (186):39–89.Google Scholar
  4. Carciofi, Ricardo. 2012. “Cooperation for the provision of regional public goods: the IIRSA case.” In The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America, edited by Pia Riggirozzi and Diana Tussie, 65–79. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CELAC. 2018. “Declaration of Santiago.” News release: Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The Federative Republic of Brazil, 22 January, https://celac.rree.gob.sv/documento-oficial/declaration-of-santiago-of-the-ii-meeting-of-ministers-of-foreign-affairs-of-the-celac-china-forum/
  6. China-CELAC Forum. 2015. Cooperation Plan (2015–2019). (23 January 2015). (Accessed 2 July 2019). http://www.chinacelacforum.org/eng/zywj_3/t1230944.htm
  7. CID. 2017. Where did China import from in 2017. In Atlas of Economic Complexity: Center for International Development at Harvard University.Google Scholar
  8. CID. 2019. Atlas of Economic Complexity. (Accessed 10 January 2020). http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/. Accessed.
  9. Collyns, Dan. 2018. Peru president Pedro Pablo Kuczynski resigns amid corruption scandal. The Guardian. (22 March 2018). (Accessed 2 June 2019). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/21/peru-president-pedro-pablo-kuczynski-resigns-amid-corruption-scandal
  10. CRS. 2019. “China’s Engagement with Latin America and the Caribbean.” Congressional Research Service (Washington, DC). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IF10982.pdf
  11. De La Torre, Augusto, and Alain, Ize. 2019. Latin American Growth: A Trade Perspective. Policy Research Working Paper. (Accessed 2 July 2019). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/690421559580059769/pdf/Latin-American-Growth-A-Trade-Perspective.pdf
  12. Dreher, Axel, and Jan-Egbert Sturm. 2012. “Do the IMF and the World Bank influence voting in the UN General Assembly?” Public Choice 151 (1–2):363–397. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9750-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dussel Peters, E., Ariel Armony, and Shoujun Cui, eds. 2018. Building Development for a New Era: Asian Studies Center: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Easterly, William, and Tobias Pfutze. 2008. “Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (2):29–52. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ECLAC. 2018. “Exploring new forms of cooperation between China and Latin America and the Caribbean.” ECLAC (Santiago, Chile). https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43214/1/S1701249_en.pdf
  16. ECLAC. 2019. “Social Panorama of Latin America 2018.” Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (Santiago, Chile). https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/44396-social-panorama-latin-america-2018
  17. Ferdinand, Peter. 2016. “Westward ho—the China dream and ‘one belt, one road’: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping.” International Affairs 92 (4):941–957. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleck, Robert K., and Christopher Kilby. 2006. “How Do Political Changes Influence US Bilateral Aid Allocations? Evidence from Panel Data.” Review of Development Economics 10 (2):210–223. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00313.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornes, Gaston, and Alvaro Mendez. 2018. The China-Latin America Axis: Emerging Markets and their Role in an Increasingly Globalised World. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamble, Andrew, and Anthony Payne. 1996. “Conclusion: the new regionalism.” In Regionalism and World Order, edited by Andrew Gamble and Anthony Payne, 247–264. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilson, Julie. 2002. “Defining Inter-Regionalism: The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM).” School of East Asian Studies, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  22. Harrigan, Jane, Chengang Wang, and Hamed El-Said. 2006. “The economic and political determinants of IMF and world bank lending in the Middle East and North Africa.” World Development 34 (2):247–270. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkins, Darren G., David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, and Michael J. Tierney, eds. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Heath, Timothy R. 2016. “China’s evolving approach to Economic Diplomacy.” Asia Policy 22:157–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hettne, Björn. 2003. “The New Regionalism Revisited.” In Theories of New Regionalism. International Political Economy Series, edited by F Söderbaum and Shaw T.M. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. IMF. 2010. “World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing Growth.” International Monetary Fund (Washington, D.C.). https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/
  27. IMF. 2016a. “Regional Economic Outlook Update – Latin America and the Caribbean: Are Chills Here to Stay?” International Monetary Fund (Washington, D.C.). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/WH/Issues/2016/04/05/Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean-Are-Chills-Here-to-Stay
  28. IMF. 2016b. “World Economic Outlook – Subdued Demand: Symptoms and Remedies.” International Monetary Fund (Washington, D.C.). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Subdued-Demand-Symptoms-and-Remedies
  29. IMF. 2019. “World Economic Outlook Update: A Weakening Global Expansion.” International Monetary Fund (Washington, D.C.). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/01/11/weo-update-january-2019
  30. Kilby, Christopher. 2009. “The political economy of conditionality: An empirical analysis of World Bank loan disbursements.” Journal of Development Economics 89 (1):51–61. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kynge, James. 2018. AIIB set to extend reach to Latin America and Africa. Financial Times. (7 May 2018). (Accessed 02 July 2019). https://www.ft.com/content/d45f9f00-4fa7-11e8-9471-a083af05aea7
  32. Lake, David A., and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lardé, Jeannette. 2016. Latin America’s infrastructure investment situation and challenge. FAL Bulletin 347 (3): 1–17. (Accessed 30 June 2019). https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40849/S1600759_en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  34. Legler, Thomas. 2013. “Post-hegemonic regionalism and sovereignty in Latin America: optimists, skeptics, and an emerging research agenda.” Contexto Internacional 35 (2):325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LPO. 2019. “Trump presiona a Macri para que cierre la base espacial de China en Neuquén”. (16 April 2019). (Accessed 2 July 2019). https://www.lapoliticaonline.com/nota/118765-trump-presiona-a-macri-para-que-cierre-la-base-espacial-de-china-en-neuquen/
  36. Martin, Lisa L. 1992. “Interests, power, and multilateralism.” International Organization 46 (4):765–792. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mendez, Alvaro. 2017. Colombian Agency and the Making of US Foreign Policy: Intervention by Invitation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendez, Alvaro. 2019. “Latin America and the AIIB: Interests and Viewpoints.” Global Policy:1–6. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. MIREMH. 2019. “Canciller Valencia se reúne con Vicepresidente chino y Canciller Wang Yi en el marco de VIII consultas diplomáticas.” News release: Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Movilidad Humana de Ecuador, 1 November 2019, https://www.cancilleria.gob.ec/canciller-valencia-se-reune-con-vicepresidente-chino-y-canciller-wang-yi-en-el-marco-de-viii-consultas-diplomaticas/
  41. MMC, and IDB. 2018. Overview of Infrastructure Investment in Latin America. Marsh & McLennan Companies: Global Risk Center and IDB Invest. (Accessed 10 June 2019). https://www.mmc.com/content/dam/mmc-web/Files/Overview-of-Infrastructure-Investment-in-Latin-America.pdf
  42. Moynihan, Harriet. 2017. “China’s Evolving Approach to International Dispute Settlement. Chatham House.” Royal Institute of International Affairs. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2017-03-29-chinas-evolving-approach-international-dispute-settlement-moynihan-final.pdf
  43. Muñoz, Heraldo. 2018. “The Dominant Themes in Latin American Foreign Relations: An Introduction.” In Latin American Nations in World Politics, edited by Heraldo Muñoz and Joseph S. Tulchin, 1–16. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Myers, Margaret. 2019. The Reasons for China’s Cooling Interest in Latin America, Americas Quarterly. Americas Quarterly. (23 April 2019). (Accessed 30 June 2019). https://www.americasquarterly.org/content/how-beijing-sees-it
  45. Pape, Robert Anthony. 2005. “Soft Balancing Against the United States.” International Security 30 (1):7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peng, Zhongzhou, and Sow Tok. 2016. “The AIIB and China’s Normative Power in International Financial Governance Structure.” Chinese Political Science Review 1 (4):736–753. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0042-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pérez Caldentey, Esteban 2016. “A time to reflect on opportunities for debate and dialogue between (neo)structuralism and heterodox schools of thought.” In Neostructuralism and heterodox thinking in Latin America and the Caribbean in the early twenty-first century, edited by ECLAC, 31–83. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.Google Scholar
  48. Pew. 2018. “Pew Global Attitudes Survey.” Pew Research Center. https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/dataset/ds00139_en
  49. Puntigliano, Andres Rivarola, and Jose Briceño-Ruiz, eds. 2013. Resilience of Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean: Development and Autonomy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Regalado Florido, Eduardo. 2009. Current Economic Relations Between China and Latin America. Vrf Series: Ide-Jetro 448 (March). (Accessed 29 June 2019). https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Download/Vrf/pdf/448.pdf
  51. Renard, Thomas. 2015. “Partnerships for effective multilateralism? Assessing the compatibility between EU bilateralism, (inter-)regionalism and multilateralism.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (1):1–18. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1060691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reuters. 2017. Venezuela’s economy shrank 16.5 percent in 2016: government. (22 December 2017). (Accessed 5 July 2019)Google Scholar
  53. Riggirozzi, Pia, and Diana Tussie. 2017. “Rethinking Our Region in a Post-Hegemonic Moment.” In Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in the Americas: Toward a Pacific–Atlantic Divide?, edited by Jose Briceño-Ruiz and Isidro Morales, 16–31. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rojas, René. 2017. “The Ebbing “Pink Tide”: An Autopsy of Left-Wing Regimes in Latin America.” New Labor Forum 26 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rüland, Jürgen, Heiner Hänggi, and Ralf Roloff, eds. 2006. Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Sanahuja, Jose Antonio. 2012. “Regionalismo post-liberal y multilateralismo en Sudamérica: El caso de UNASUR.” In El regionalismo “post–liberal” en América Latina y el Caribe: Nuevos actores, nuevos temas, nuevos desafíos Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Gran Caribe 2012, edited by Andres Serbin, Laneydi Martínez and Haroldo Ramanzini Júnior, 19–72. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CRIES.Google Scholar
  57. Serebrisky, Tomás, Ancor Suárez-Alemán, Cinthya Pastor, and Andreas Wohlhueter. 2018. “Lifting the Veil on Infrastructure Investment Data in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/lifting-veil-infrastructure-investment-data-latin-america-and-caribbean
  58. Shambaugh, David. 2008. China’s new foray into Latin America. Yale Global Online. (17 November). (Accessed 10 June 2019)Google Scholar
  59. Stallings, Barbara, and Eun Mee Kim. 2017. Promoting Development: The Political Economy of East Asian foreign Aid. Singapore: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stein, Arthur A. 1990. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice In International Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Turzi, Mariano. 2016. “The Agropolis: South America, China, and the Soybean Connections.” In The political economy of China-Latin American relations in the new millennium: brave new world, edited by Carol Wise and Margaret Myers, 170–188. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. U.S Department of State. 2019. “Joint Regional Strategy.” Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs and Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean, State Department. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/JRS_WHA-LAC_UNCLASS-508.pdf
  63. UNCTAD. 2019. “World Investment Report.” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2019_en.pdf
  64. Vazquez, Karin Costa, & Chin, Gregory T. 2019. The AIIB and Sustainable Infrastructure: A Hybrid Layered Approach. Global Policy, 10(4), 593–603.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. WEF. 2018. “The Global Competitiveness Report 2018.” World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitveness-report-2018
  66. White House. 2001. “Remarks by President George Bush and President Vicente Fox of Mexico at Arrival Ceremony.” News Release, 5 September 2001, https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010905-2.html
  67. WTO. 2019. Dispute Settlement Gateway. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm. Accessed 8 July 2019.
  68. Yu, Hong. 2017. “Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.” Journal of Contemporary China 26 (105):353–368.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhu, Jiejin. 2019. Is the AIIB a China-controlled Bank? China’s Evolving Multilateralism in Three Dimensions (3D). Global Policy, 10(4), 653–659.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fudan Institute for Global Public PolicyFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.ESIC Business & Marketing SchoolMadridSpain
  3. 3.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  4. 4.UCEMABuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations