Advertisement

Sustainability as Criteria of Evaluation of Suppliers

  • Maciej UrbaniakEmail author
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to present the use by international corporations of sustainability concepts as criteria for initial and periodic evaluation of suppliers. In recent times, one may have noticed that global companies are increasingly implementing their strategies based on the concept of sustainable development, and are evaluating and selecting their suppliers based on the sustainability concept. While observing global trends one could notice that more and more suppliers are monitored in terms of the principles of sustainable development. This concept includes the economic aspects (requiring high technical quality, the reliability of supply, price competitiveness), environmental aspects, as well as social ones (rules based on the idea of the Global Compact) Requirements for the implementation of this concept are transferred to suppliers by issuing rules of conduct and ethical standards. The analyses, presented here on practical examples of the chemical, electronics, and pharmaceutical manufacturers show that buyers define specific standards for ethical conduct to their suppliers. Multinational enterprises which are buyers do not limit themselves to putting stringent requirements on suppliers. They also offer their providers support programs for the implementation of the sustainability concept.

Keywords

Sustainability Supplier requirements Supplier evaluation The chemical Electronics and pharmaceutical manufacturers International corporations 

References

  1. Airike PE, Rotter JP, Mark-Herbert C (2016) Corporate motives for multi-stakeholder collaboration—corporate social responsibility in the electronics supply chains. J Clean Prod 131:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burritt R, Schaltegger S (2014) Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains. Br Account Rev 46(4):327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crespin-Mazet F, Dontenwill E (2012) Sustainable procurement: building legitimacy in the supply network. J Purch Supply Manag 18(4):207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forkmann S, Henneberg SC, Naudé P, Mitrega M (2016) Supplier relationship management capability: a qualification and extension. Ind Mark Manage 57:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gallego-Álvarez I, Ortas E (2017) Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: a quantile regression approach. Int Bus Rev 26:337–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghadimi P, Dargi A, Heavey C (2017) Sustainable supplier performance scoring using audition check-list based fuzzy inference system: A case application in automotive spare part industry. Comput Ind Eng 105:12–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goebel P, Reuter C, Pibernik R, Sichtmann Ch (2012) The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing. Int J Prod Econ 140(2):7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Govindan K, Shankar M, Kannan D (2018) Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices. Int J Prod Econ 200:353–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grimm JH, Hofstetter JS, Sarkis J (2016) Exploring sub-suppliers’ compliance with corporate sustainability standards. J Clean Prod 11:1971–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grzybowska K (2012) Sustainability in the supply chain: analysing the enablers. In: Golinska P, Romano CA (eds) Environmental issues in supply chain management, EcoProduction. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guenther E, Jasch Ch, Schmidt M, Wagner B, Ilg P (2015) Material flow cost accounting—looking back and ahead. J Clean Prod 108:1249–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hänninen N, Karjaluoto H (2017) Environmental values and customer-perceived value in industrial supplier relationships. J Clean Prod 156:604–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helin S, Babri M (2015) Travelling with a code of ethics: a contextual study of a Swedish MNC auditing a Chinese supplier. J Clean Prod 107:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoejmose SU, Roehrich JK, Grosvold J (2014) Is doing more doing better? The relationship between responsible supply chain management and corporate reputation. Ind Mark Manage 43(1):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Igarashi M, de Boer L, Fet AM (2013) What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. J Purch Supply Manag 19(4):247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jia F, Zuluaga-Cardona L, Bailey A, Rueda X (2018) Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: an analysis of the literature. J Clean Prod 189:263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kammerl D, Schockenhoff D, Hollauer Ch, Weidmann D, Lindemann U (2017) A framework for sustainable product development. In: Matsumoto M, Masui K, Fukushige S, Kondoh S (eds) Sustainability through innovation in product life cycle design, EcoProduction. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kannan G (2018) Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: a conceptual framework. Int J Prod Econ 195:419–431Google Scholar
  19. Khan SA, Kusi-Sarpong S, Kow F, Kusi-Sarpong AH (2018) Supplier sustainability performance evaluation and selection: a framework and methodology. J Clean Prod 205:964–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar DT, Rahman Z (2015) Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: a literature review and conceptual framework. Int Strat Manag Rev 3:110–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar D, Palaniappan M, Kannan D, Shankar KM (2014) Analyzing the CSR issues behind the supplier selection process using ISM approach. Resourc Conserv Recycl 92:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee E, Han S, Hye HU, Rho JJ (2013) Building capabilities via suppliers’ effective management of relationships. Ind Mark Manag 42:805–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li W-Y, Chow P-S, Choi T-M, Chan H-L (2016) Supplier integration, green sustainability programs, and financial performance of fashion enterprises under global financial crisis. J Clean Prod 135:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu Ch-Ch, Yu Ch-Ch, Wernick IK, Chang C-Y (2015) Using the electronic industry code of conduct to evaluate green supply chain management: an empirical study of Taiwan’s computer industry. Sustainability 7:2787–2803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lo H-W, Liou JJH, Wang H-S, Tsai Y-S (2018) An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J Clean Prod 190:339–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mani V, Gunasekaran A, Delgado C (2018) Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: an emerging economy perspective. Int J Prod Econ 195:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakajima M, Kimura A, Wagner B (2015) Introduction of material flow cost accounting (MFCA) to the supply chain: a questionnaire study on the challenges of constructing a low-carbon supply chain to promote resource efficiency. J Clean Prod 108:1302–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neutzling D, Land A, Seuring S, Machado do Nascimento LF (2018) Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration. J Clean Prod 172:3448–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prasanna VS, Goh M (2016) Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. Transp Res 95:124–142Google Scholar
  30. Raj-Reichert G (2013) Safeguarding labour in distant factories: health and safety governance in an electronics global production network. Geoforum 44:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rashidi K, Saen RF (2018) Incorporating dynamic concept into gradual efficiency: improving suppliers in sustainable supplier development. J Clean Prod 202:226–243Google Scholar
  32. Sancha C, Gimenez C, Sierra V (2016) Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration. J Clean Prod 112:1934–1947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Su Ch, Yang H (2017) Supplier-buyer relationship management in marketing and management research: an area for interdisciplinary integration. J Bus Res 78:180–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Torres-Ruiz A, Ravindran AR (2018) Multiple criteria framework for the sustainability risk assessment of a supplier portfolio. J Clean Prod 172:4478–4493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trapp AC, Sarkis J (2016) Identifying robust portfolios of suppliers: a sustainability selection and development perspective. J Clean Prod 112:2088–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urbaniak M (2015) Building relationship between OEM customers and suppliers in product innovation development processes. Mod Manag Rev 20(1):185–197Google Scholar
  37. Vahidi F, Torabi SA, Ramezankhani MJ (2018) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. J Clean Prod 174:1351–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wagner SM (2011) Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle. Int J Prod Econ 129(2):277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilhelm M, Blome C, Wieck E, Xiao C (2016) Implementing sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: strategies and contingencies in managing sub-suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 182:196–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Winter S, Lasch R (2016) Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation—lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. J Clean Prod 139:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan T, Dooley KJ (2013) Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty in buyer–supplier new product development. J Oper Manag 31(7–8):523–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yawar SA, Seuring S (2018) The role of supplier development in managing social and societal issues in supply chains. J Clean Prod 182:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yoo SH, Shin H, Park M-S (2015) New product development and the effect of supplier involvement. Omega 51:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang Ch, Henke JW Jr, Viswanathan S (2015) Reciprocity between buyer cost sharing and supplier technology sharing. Int J Prod Econ 163:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ManagementLodz UniversityLodzPoland

Personalised recommendations