Advertisement

The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 on Business Models

  • Sandra GrabowskaEmail author
  • Bożena Gajdzik
  • Sebastian Saniuk
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

Development of the concept Industry 4.0, dictated by the need to reverse the downward trend in industrial production of European enterprises, forces modern enterprises to adapt quickly and flexibly. These adaptations affect demand conditions, production costs, and the search for new business solutions. The dynamic development of industrial digitization and telecommunications technologies allows for better integration of processes, machines, employees and individual products within the framework of intelligent network structures. Industry 4.0 facilitates data collection and analysis, evaluation of productivity and continuous improvement of processes. The development of the Industry 4.0 concept was needed to develop new competitive business models. These business models need to be based on cooperation and better use of the available resources. As a result, enterprises could achieve a competitive advantage through the personalization of products and low production costs. This fourth industrial revolution affects the operational activity of enterprises and results in new strategic thinking. The basis of new business models modified value chains within the network of cooperating enterprises. Supply chains equipped with the latest cyber–physical solutions ensure fast reorganization of logistics processes and a very flexible adaptation of commercialization. These new forms of supply chains offer the most personalized customer expectations. With the development of the Industry 4.0 concept, questions arise: what new forms will business models adopt? What will the cooperation of enterprises that are inherently competitors be? What tools will be able to support network cooperation of enterprises? The aim of this study is to identify the challenges related to the adaptation of business models. The Industry 4.0 concept, includes issues such as reconfiguration of value chains, customization and sharing resources in the network of companies operating under flexible supply chains.

Keywords

Business models in Industry 4.0 Value chain Supply chain Flexible Sustainable development 

References

  1. Afuah A (2004) Business models. A strategic management approach. McGraw-Hill Irwin, pp 9–10Google Scholar
  2. Afuah A, Tucci CL (2001) Internet business models and strategies. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, pp 18–32Google Scholar
  3. Ashton K (2009) That ‘Internet of Things’ thing. RFID J, 22 June 2009. https://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4986. Accessed 9 December 2017
  4. Baden-Filler C, Haefliger S (2017) Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Plan 46:419–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
  5. Bakkari M., Khatory A (2018) Industry 4.0: strategy for more sustainable industrial development in SMEs. http://ieomsociety.org/ieom2017/papers/414.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2018
  6. Bauernhansl T, Hompel M, Vogel-Henser B (2014) Industrie 4.0 in Produkten, Automatisierung und Logistik. Springer Fachmedien, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  7. Bijańska J, Wodarski K, Wójcik J (2016) Preparing the production of a new product in small and medium—sized enterprise by using the method of projects management. Manag Syst Prod Eng 22(2):128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casson M (1991) Global research strategy and international competitiveness. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, p 513Google Scholar
  9. Chui M, Löffler M, Roberts R (2010) The Internet of Things. McKinsey Q 2(47):1–9Google Scholar
  10. Clarke T, Clegg S (2000) Management paradigm for the new millennium. Int J Manag Rev 2(1):45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Copeland T, Koller T, Murrin J (1990) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of comapnies. Wiley, New York, pp 308–310Google Scholar
  12. Domingo Galindo L (2016) The challenges of logistics 4.0 for the supply chain management and the information technology. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, May 2016Google Scholar
  13. Franke U (2001) The concept of virtual web organizations and its implications on changing market conditions. Electr J Organ Virtualness 3. www.virtual-organization.net. Accessed 21 Nov 2018
  14. Gajdzik B (2014) Autonomous and professional maintenance in metallurgical enterprises as activities within total productive maintenance. Metalurgija 53(1):269–272Google Scholar
  15. Gajdzik B, Grzybowska K (2012) Examples model of building trust in supply chains of metallurgical enterprises. Metalurgija 4(51):563–566Google Scholar
  16. Grabowska S (2016) Business model metallurgical company built on the competitive advantage. In: METAL 2016. 25th anniversary international conference on metallurgy and materials. Conference proceedings, Brno, Czech Republic, 25–27 May 2016. Tanger, Ostrava, pp 1800–1807Google Scholar
  17. Grabowska S, Furman J (2015) Business model of steel company—focus on the innovation. In: METAL 2015. 24th international conference on metallurgy and materials. Conference proceedings, Brno, Czech Republic, 3–5 June 2015. Tanger, Ostrava, pp 1933–1938Google Scholar
  18. Grzybowska K (2012) Sustainability in the supply chain: analysing the enablers. In: Golinska P, Romano C (eds) Environmental issues in supply chain management. EcoProduction (Environmental issues in logistics and manufacturing). Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grzybowska K, Gajdzik B (2012) Optimisation of equipment setup process in enterprises. Metalurgija 4(51):555–558Google Scholar
  20. Grzybowska K, Gajdzik B (2014) Logistic strategies in purchasing process of metallurgical companies. Metalurgija 53(1):127–130Google Scholar
  21. Hamprecht J (2006) Sustainable purchasing strategy in the food industry. Dissertation, University of St. Gallen International Federation of Robotics. Robot Density Rises Globally, Frankfurt, 7 Feb 2018. https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/robot-density-rises-globally. Accessed 15 Nov 2018
  22. Jabłoński M (ed) (2019) Strategic value management: a dynamic perspective. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones SE, LeBaron C (2002) Research on the relationship between verbal and nonverbal communication: Emerging entegrations. J Commun 53(3):499–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (eds) (2011) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0: final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group 2013; Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution, VDI-Nachrichten, April 2011Google Scholar
  25. Kaliczyńska M, Dąbek P (2015) Value of the Internet of Things for the industry—an overview. In: Mechatronics: ideas for industrial applications, pp 51–63Google Scholar
  26. Korena Y, Shpitalnib M, Guc P, Hu SJ (2015) Product design for mass-individualization. Procedia CIRP, Elsevier 36:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krykavskyy Y, Mashchak N (2017) Sustainable supply chain in forming environmental macro responsibility. In: Golinska-Dawson P, Kolinski A (eds) Efficiency in sustainable supply chain. EcoProduction (Environmental issues in logistics and manufacturing). Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuczyńska-Chałada M, Furman J (2018) The process of improvement with the application of lean manufacturing in a steel company. In: 26th international conference on metallurgy and materials—METAL 2017, Brno, Czech Republic. Tanger Ltd., Ostrava, pp 1894–1899Google Scholar
  29. Liker JK (ed) (1997) Becoming lean; Inside stories of U.S. manufacturers. Productivity Press, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  30. Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way. 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill (2004)Google Scholar
  31. Moden Y (1998) Toyota production system: an integrated approach to just-in time. Engineering and Managemnt Press, Norcross, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Mrugalska B, Wyrwicka MK (2017) Towards lean production in industry 4.0. Procedia Eng 182:466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nanterme P, Daugherty P (2017) Technology for people: the era of the intelligent enterprise. AccentureGoogle Scholar
  34. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Presss, New York, pp 35–37Google Scholar
  35. Porter ME (1990a) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York, pp 71–72Google Scholar
  36. Porter ME (1990b) Competitive advantage of nation. MacMillan, London, p 45Google Scholar
  37. Porter ME (1996a) What is strategy. Harv Bus Rev, November–December 1996:61–78Google Scholar
  38. Porter ME (1996b) What is strategy. Harv Bus Rev, November–December 1996:64–76Google Scholar
  39. Porter ME (2002) Strategy and the Internet. In: Harvard business review on advanced strategy. Harvard Business School Corporation, pp 1–50Google Scholar
  40. Prahalad CK, Krishnan MS (2010) The new age of innovation. McGrow-Hill, New York, p 15Google Scholar
  41. Robot Density Rises Globally. www.ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/robot-density-rises-globally. Accessed 21 Nov 2018
  42. Sahay BS (2003) Understanding trust in supply chain relationships. Ind Manag Data Syst 103(8):553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saniuk A, Saniuk S (2017) Management of the metallurgical enterprise according to the industry 4.0 concept. In: 26th international coference on metallurgy and materials—METAL 2017, Brno, Czech Republic. Tanger Ltd., Ostrava, pp 2034–2039. ISBN 9788087294796Google Scholar
  44. Saniuk S, Saniuk A (2018) Decision support system for rapid production order planning in production network. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 637. Springer International Publishing, pp 217–226Google Scholar
  45. Szymańska O, Adamczak M, Cyplik P (2017) Logistics 4.0—a new paradigm or set of known solutions? Res Logist Prod 7(4):299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tadejko P (2015) Application of Internet of Things in logistics—current challenges. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 7(4):54–64Google Scholar
  47. Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):172–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wicher P, Stas D, Karkula M, Lenort R, Besta B (2015) A computer simulation based analysis of supply chains resilience in industrial environment. Metalurgija 54:703–706Google Scholar
  49. Wirtz BW, Pistoia A, Ullrich S, Gottel V (2016) Business model innovation: development, concept and future research directions. Long Range Plan 19Google Scholar
  50. Womack JP, Jones DT (2003) lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH (2007) Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. J Clean Prod 15:1041–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Grabowska
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bożena Gajdzik
    • 1
  • Sebastian Saniuk
    • 2
  1. 1.Silesian University of TechnologyKatowicePoland
  2. 2.University of Zielona GóraZielona GóraPoland

Personalised recommendations