Skip to main content

Using Genetics in the Conservation Management of the American Black Bear (Ursus americanus) in Missouri

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conservation Genetics in Mammals

Abstract

By the early 1900s, black bears were believed to be almost extinct in Missouri and Arkansas, presumably due to extensive logging and overharvest. To reestablish Arkansas populations, the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission conducted a translocation program from 1958 to 1968, moving 254 bears from Minnesota and Manitoba, Canada, to the Ozark and Ouachita National Forests. This remains one of the most successful large mammal translocations ever conducted, and the Arkansas population grew rapidly into the thousands. However, bear sightings and nuisance reports suggested that 50 years after the translocations, populations in Missouri were small, and densities were low. We conducted a spatially explicit genetic capture-recapture study to estimate the size and density of the black bear population in south-central Missouri. We genotyped hair samples collected over two years using 15 microsatellite loci and estimated the population size at 279 ± 54 (SE) and the density at 1.7 bears/km2. To infer the source of bears colonizing Missouri, we analyzed the resulting genotypes in the Bayesian clustering program STRUCTURE along with genotypes from Arkansas, Oklahoma, and source populations. The results revealed unique genetic clusters in the Ouachitas, the Ozarks, and the source populations and found that Missouri bears were divided between those that clustered with the Ozarks and a unique cluster. The presence of the unique cluster in Missouri supports the hypothesis that black bears in the Missouri Ozarks were not extirpated but were reduced to very low densities during European settlement and have subsequently become admixed with bears that trace their ancestry to the reintroduction. While some might suggest that the unique Missouri population should be designated as a separate management unit, we caution that this might not be beneficial to the preservation of the Missouri bear population as we have no evidence that it is ecologically or geographically distinct, it has low genetic diversity, and the genetic differentiation may not be related to adaptive differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bales SL, Hellgren EC, Leslie DMJ, Hemphill JJ (2005) Dynamics of a recolonizing population of black bears in the Ouachita Mountains of Oklahoma. Wildlife Soc B 33:1342–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belant JL, Van Stappen JF, Paetkau D (2005) American black bear population size and genetic diversity at Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. Ursus 16:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennitt R, Nagel WO (1937) A survey of the resident game and furbearers in Missouri. University of Missouri Studies 12:2. Columbia, MO

    Google Scholar 

  • Biebach I, Keller LF (2009) A strong genetic footprint of the reintroduction history of Alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex). Mol Ecol 18:5046–5058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner SL, King TL, Harvey WF (2002) Estimating Maryland’s black bear population using hair snaring and DNA analysis. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 56:312–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger J, Himmer S, Swan C (2004) Monitoring of grizzly bear population trends and demography using DNA mark–recapture methods in the Owikeno Lake area of British Columbia. Can J Zool 82:1267–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AG (2008) Demographic characteristics and habitat associations of an expanding black bear (Ursus americanus) population in Oklahoma. In: Master of Science Thesis. Oklahoma State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Santos F, Beaumont MA, Robert CP, Marin JM, Balding DJ, Guillemaud DJ, Estoup A (2008) Inferring population history with DIY ABC: a user-friendly approach to approximate Bayesian computation. Bioinformatics 24:2713–2719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet J-M, Pudlo P, Veyssier J, Dehne-Garcia A, Gautier M, Leblois R, Marin M, Estoup A (2014) DIYABC v2.0: a software to make approximate Bayesian computation inferences about population history using single nucleotide polymorphism, DNA sequence, and microsatellite data. Bioinformatics 30:1187–1189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damuth J (1981) Population density and body size in mammals. Nature 290:699–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JD, Oli MK, Wooten MC, Eason TH, McCown JW, Cunningham MW (2007) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation and loss: the case of the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus). Conserv Genet 8:455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher BP, Winterstein SR, Scribner KT, Lukacs PM, Etter DR, Rosa GJM, Lopez VA, Libants S, Filcek KP (2007) Noninvasive estimation of black bear abundance incorporating genotyping errors and harvested bear. J Wildlife Manage 71:2684–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efford MG (2013) Secr: Spatially explicit capture—recapture models. R package version 2.5.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=secr. Accessed 6 Aug 2018

  • Faries KM, Kristensen TV, Beringer J, Clark JD, White D Jr, Eggert LS (2013) Origins and genetic structure of contemporary populations of black bears (Ursus americanus) in the central interior highlands of North America. J Mammal 94:369–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frary VJ, Duchamp J, Maehr DS, Larkin JL (2011) Density and distribution of a colonizing front of the American black bear Ursus americanus. Wildl Biol 17:404–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner-Santana LC (2007) Patterns of genetic diversity in black bears (Ursus americanus) during a range expansion into Oklahoma. In: Master of Science Thesis. Oklahoma State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 10:305–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen TV, Puckett EE, Landguth EL, Belant JL, Hast JR, Carpenter C, Sajecki JL, Beringer J, Means M, Cox JJ, Eggert LS, White D Jr, Smith KG (2018) Spatial genetic structure in American black bears (Ursus americanus): female philopatry is variable and related to population history. Heredity 120:329–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malaney JL, Lackey CW, Beckmann JP, Matocq MD (2018) Natural rewilding of the Great Basin: genetic consequences of recolonization by black bears (Ursus americanus). Divers Distrib 24:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley D (1962) History of the black bear in Missouri. The Bluebird. Audubon Soc Missouri 29:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeake R, White Jr D, Eastridge R (2014) Encountering black bears in Arkansas. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Extension Service. https://www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/FSA-9087.pdf

  • Missouri Department of Conservation (2008) Management plan for the black bear in Missouri. Columbia, Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel-Reyes F, Maldonado JE, Del Real-Monroy M, Martinez-Méndez N, Ortega J (2014) Non-invasive sampling reveals fine-scale genetic structure in black bear Ursus americanus populations from northeastern Mexico. Endanger Species Res 26:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onorato DP, Hellgren EC, Van Den Bussche RA, Skiles JJR (2004) Paternity and relatedness of American black bears recolonizing a desert montane Island. Can J Zool 82:1201–1210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paetkau D, Shields GF, Strobeck C (1998) Gene flow between insular, coastal, and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska. Mol Ecol 7:1283–1292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelton MR (1982) Black Bear. In: Chapman JA, Feldhamer GA (eds) Wild Mammals of North America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 504–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelton MR (2003) Black bear. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 547–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Puckett EE, Etter PD, Johnson EA, Eggert LS (2015) Phylogeographic analyses of American black bears (Ursus americanus) suggest four glacial refugia and complex patterns of post-glacial admixture. Mol Biol Evol 32:2338–2350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puckett EE, Kristensen TV, Wilton CW, Lyda SB, Noyce KV, Holohan PM, Leslie DM Jr, Beringer J, Belant JL, White D Jr, Eggert LS (2014) Influence of drift and admixture on population structure of American black bears (Ursus americanus) in the Central Interior Highlands, USA 50 years after translocation. Mol Ecol 23:2414–2427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Sanderlin JS, Faircloth BC, Shamblin B, Conroy MJ (2009) Tetranucleotide microsatellite loci from the black bear (Ursus americanus). Mol Ecol Resour 9:288–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaya MA, Stetz JB, vanManen JB, Clark JD (2013) Population monitoring options for American black bears in the northeastern United States and eastern Canada. A technical publication for the Northeast Black Bear Technical Committee. http://www.neafwa.org/uploads/2/0/9/4/20948254/nebbtc_population_monitoring_report[1].final.pdf

  • Schoolcraft HR (1821) Journal of a tour into the interior of Missouri and Arkansas in the years 1818 and 1819. Richard Phillips and Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K, Clark JD, Gipson PS (1991) History of black bears in Arkansas: over-exploitation, near elimination, and successful reintroduction. Eastern Black Bear Workshop Res Manag 10:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG, Clark JD (1994) Black bears in Arkansas: characteristics of a successful translocation. J Mammal 75:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storz JF, Beaumont MA (2002) Testing for genetic evidence of population expansion and contraction: an empirical analysis of microsatellite DNA variation using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Evolution 56:154–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P, Camarra JJ, Griffin S, Uhres E, Hanotte O, Waits LP, Dubois-Paganon C, Burke T, Bouvet J (1997) Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population. Mol Ecol 6:869–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Titus R, Hamilton D, Kulowiec T, Beringer J, Johnson JR, Figg D, McCloud G, Thompson N, Cwynar T, Christoff G, Hauser C, Houf G (1993) Management plan for the black bear in Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilton CM, Puckett EE, Beringer J, Gardner B, Eggert LS, Belant JL (2014) Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance. PLoS ONE 9:e111257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori S. Eggert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Smithsonian Institution

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Puckett, E.E., Eggert, L.S. (2020). Using Genetics in the Conservation Management of the American Black Bear (Ursus americanus) in Missouri. In: Ortega, J., Maldonado, J. (eds) Conservation Genetics in Mammals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33334-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics