Summary and Implications for Clinical Practice and Research in Pediatric Populations

  • Alan M. DelamaterEmail author
  • David G. Marrero


In Parts I–V of this book are 15 chapters discussing the various levels of the social-ecological model as they related to diabetes management in pediatric populations. One recurring theme that appears in many of the chapters is the fact that the majority of youth with diabetes do not meet goals for optimal glycemic control, in spite of therapeutic and technological advances in treatment in recent years. Moreover, this disparity illuminates the limitations of relying on sophisticated technology alone to optimize diabetes clinical outcomes. When we consider the complexity of diabetes treatment and embrace the social-ecological nature of a lifestyle disease, it is not truly a surprise that advances such as newer insulin analogues, continuous glucose monitors, and insulin pumps have not resulted in optimal glycemic control.


Diabetes Children Adolescents Psychosocial factors Health behaviors Regimen adherence Clinical interventions Research issues 


  1. American Diabetes Association. (2017). Children and adolescents. Diabetes Care, 40(Supplement 1), S105–S113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Charalampopoulos, D., Hermann JM Svensson, J., et al. (2018). Exploring variation in glycemic control across and within eight high-income countries: A cross-sectional analysis of 64,666 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 41(6), 1180–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Wit, M., Pulgarón, E., Patiño-Fernandez, A. M., & Delamater, A. (2014). Psychological support for children with diabetes: Are the guidelines being met? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 21(2), 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delamater, A. M. (2012). Successful team management of type 1 diabetes in children and young people: Key psychosocial issues. Diabetes Care in Children & Young People, 1, 10–16.Google Scholar
  5. Delamater, A. M., de Wit, M., McDarby, V., Malik, J., Hilliard, M. E., Northam, E., & Acerini, C. L. (2018). ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines: Psychological care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes, 19(Supplement 27), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeSalvo, D. J., Miller, K. M., Hermann, J. M., Maahs, D. M., et al. (2018). Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D exchange and DPV initiative. Pediatric Diabetes, 19, 1271–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis, D., Naar-King, S., Templin, T., Frey, M., Cunningham, P., Sheidow, A., . . . Idalski, A. (2008). Multisystemic therapy for adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: Reduced diabetic ketoacidosis admissions and related costs over 24 months. Diabetes Care, 31(9), 1746–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher, L., Gonzalez, J. S., & Polonsky, W. H. (2014). The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: A call for greater clarity and precision. Diabetic Medicine, 31(7), 764–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster, N. C., Beck, W., Miller, K. M., Clements, M. A., Rickles, M. R., DiMeglio, L. A., … for the T1D Exchange Clinical Network. (2019). State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 21(2), 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hood, K. K., Iturralde, E., Rausch, J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. (2018). Preventing diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Results one year after participation in the STePS program. Diabetes Care. Scholar
  11. Hood, K. K., Rohan, J. M., Peterson, C. M., & Drotar, D. (2010). Interventions with adherence-promoting components in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 33, 1658–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marrero, D. G., Ard, J., Delamater, A. M., Peragallo-Ditko, V., Mayer-Davis, E. J., Nwankwo, R., & Fisher, E. B. (2013). 21st century behavioral medicine: A context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes—A consensus report. Diabetes Care, 36, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Naranjo, D., Schwartz, D. D., & Delamater, A. M. (2015). Diabetes in ethnically diverse youth: Disparate burden and intervention approaches. Current Diabetes Reviews, 11, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Skinner, T. C., Lange, K. S., Hoey, H., et al. (2018). The Hvidoere study group targets and teamwork: Understanding differences in paediatric diabetes centers treatment outcomes. Pediatric Diabetes, 19(3), 559–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Swift, P. G., Skinner, T. C., De Beaufort, C. E., et al. (2010). Target setting in intensive insulin management is associated with metabolic control: The Hvidoere childhood diabetes study group Centre differences study 2005. Pediatric Diabetes, 11, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wood, J. R., Miller, K. M., Maahs, D. M., et al. (2013). Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D exchange clinic registry do not meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes clinical guidelines. Diabetes Care, 36, 2035–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Young-Hyman, D., de Groot, M., Hill-Briggs, F., Gonzalez, J. S., Hood, K., & Peyrot, M. (2016). Psychosocial care for people with diabetes: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 39(12), 2126–2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Center for Border Health DisparitiesUniversity of ArizonaTusconUSA

Personalised recommendations