Exploring the Development of Reflection Among Pre-service Teachers in Online Collaborative Writing: An Epistemic Network Analysis

  • Yuhe YiEmail author
  • Xiaoxu Lu
  • Jing Leng
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1112)


Facilitating reflection of pre-service teacher is becoming a more and more important topic in teacher education. There are a number of social media tools which can support teacher professional development. It also enables us to examine the development of individuals’ reflective process and group dynamics. In this study, 50 pre-service teachers were involved to write scripts collaboratively using wikis and they were encouraged to reflect upon their written texts and script-writing strategies during the online collaborative writing process. In particular, epistemic network analysis is adopted in order to characterize learners’ reflection dynamics during the two phases of collaborative script writing. The research results show that the characteristics of reflection type in different phases are different. Also, teachers tend to reflect on the content and methods of the group in the first phase; while in the second phase, they tend to reflect on the group methods and personal gains. Using content analysis and epistemic network analysis, this paper characterize the development of reflection during collaborative writing activities and provides reference for the cultivation of reflection among pre-service teachers.


Teacher reflection Teacher professional development Collaborative writing Epistemic network analysis 


  1. Beyer, L.E.: Field experience, ideology, and the development of critical reflectivity. J. Teach. Educ. 35(3), 36–41 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomberg, G., Sherin, M.G., Alexander, R., et al.: Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instr. Sci. 42(3), 443–463 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colton, A.B., Sparks-Langer, G.M.: A conceptual framework to guide the development of teacher reflection and decision making. J. Teach. Educ. 44(1), 45–54 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D.W., Fischer, F.: When coding-and-counting is not enough: using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 13, 419–438 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. van Es, E.A., Sherin, M.G.: Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24(2), 244–276 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Good, J.M., Whang, P.A.: Encouraging reflection in preservice teachers through response journals. Teach. Educ. 37(4), 254–267 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hatton, N., Smith, D.: Reflection in teacher-education - towards definition and implementation. Teach. Teach. Educ. 11(1), 33–49 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krutka, D.G., Bergman, D.J., Flores, R., et al.: Microblogging about teaching: Nurturingparticipatory cultures through collaborative online reflection with pre-service teachers. Teach. Teach. Educ. 40, 83–93 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mckinney, M.: Preservice teachers’ electronic portfolios: integrating technology, self-assessment, and reflection. Teach. Educ. Q. 25(1), 85–103 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. Potter, G.: Facilitating critical reflection on practice through collaborative research. Aust. Educ. Res. 28(3), 117–139 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, R., Li, Y.: What matters most: a comparison of expert and novice teachers’ noticing of mathematics classroom events. Sch. Sci. Math. 112(7), 420–432 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)Google Scholar
  13. Shaffer, D.W., Graesser, A.: Using quantitative model of participation in a community of practice to direct automated mentoring in an ill-formed domain. In: Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), Pittsburgh, PA (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Information TechnologyEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations