Pushing Ahead with the Drive to Scaling up SDGs Implementation

  • Vuyo MjimbaEmail author
  • Gbadebo O. A. Odularu
Part of the Sustainable Development Goals Series book series (SDGS)


The world is truly on the road towards the year 2030 that will (hopefully) have entrenched the ideals of sustainable development. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development accompanied by the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets is an important vehicle in this quest. To avoid the shortcomings of previous global drives, there is a need to routinely determine and quantitatively estimate all aspects that can inform the efficient and targeted use of resources that drive this agenda. This approach is the quintessence of responsible consumption and production, aspects that are closely addressed under SDG 12. In addition, there is a need to coordinate policy actions within and across national borders and continents. This is critical for delivering a critical mass of transformation that can deliver the SDGs mandate. The coordination of policy actions is the crux of contemporary research and practice revolving around the concept of policy coherence for sustainable development initiatives whose aim is to increase the effects of policy interventions. This concluding chapter reflects on how various key state and non-state actors covering the global, national and sub-national levels are contributing to the drive of scaling up the implementation of SDGs.


Scaling up Policy perspectives 2030 Agenda 


  1. Beland, D. (2007). Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hacker, J. S. (2005). Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment. In W. Streek & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 40–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Moen, R., & Norman, C. (2006). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from
  5. Stibbe, D. T., Reid, S., & Gilbert, J. (2018). Maximising the impact of partnerships for the SDGs. The partnering initiative and UN DESA. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from
  6. United Nations, UN, 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved 26 July 2019 from: Scholar
  7. UNDG (United Nations Development Group). (2016). MAPS—A common approach to the UNDG’s policy support to the SDGs—An update on implementation March 2016. Retrieved July 3, 2019, from
  8. Vargesson, N. (2015). Review thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: History and mechanisms. Birth Defects Research. Part C, Embryo Today, 105(2), 140–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. World Bank. (2019). ‘Creating markets’ to leverage the private sector for sustainable development and growth: An evaluation of the World Bank Group’s experience through 16 case studies. Washington, DC: Independent Evaluation Group. World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Wilson, J. Q. (1974). The politics of regulation. In J. W. McKie (Ed.), Social responsibility and the business predicament (pp. 135–168). Washington: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), Africa Institute of SouthPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Socio-Economic Research Applications & Projects (SERAP LLC)Washington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations