Advertisement

Identifying the Global Drivers

  • Maria Ravlik
Chapter

Abstract

Part II of the book offers a more rigorous examination of macro-level determinants that explains anti-trafficking enforcement across the globe. In this chapter, these determinants are identified via quantifiable global measures. They capture how country-level lack of equality, unwillingness to follow the standards of international law, the lack of political culture, state capacity and liberal democracy, and high demand for vulnerable people might hinder effective anti-trafficking enforcement.

Keywords

Gender inequality International law Political culture State capacity Liberal democracy Demand 

References

  1. Aidt, T. S. (2009). Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aidt, T., Dutta, J., & Sena, V. (2008). Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, A. C., & Welzel, C. (2011). Measuring effective democracy: The human empowerment approach. Comparative Politics, 43(3), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora, R. U. (2012). Gender inequality, economic development, and globalization: A state level analysis of India. The Journal of Developing Areas, 46(1), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Askola, H. (2007). Legal responses to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation in the European Union. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  6. Assembly UN General. (2000). Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, supplementing the United Nations convention against transnational organized crime. GA Res, 55, 25.Google Scholar
  7. Avdeyeva, O. A. (2012). Does reputation matter for states’ compliance with international treaties? States enforcement of anti-trafficking norms. The International Journal of Human Rights, 16(2), 298–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Babbie, E. R. (2013). The basics of social research. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  9. Bardhan, K., & Klasen, S. (1999). UNDP’s gender-related indices: A critical review. World Development, 27(6), 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilbao-Ubillos, J. (2013). Another approach to measuring human development: The composite dynamic human development index. Social Indicators Research, 111(2), 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (2000). Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Busse, M. (2004). Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties: An empirical analysis. Kyklos, 57(1), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caprioli, M. (2009). Making choices. Politics & Gender, 5(3), 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caprioli, M., Hudson, V. M., McDermott, R., Ballif-Spanvill, B., Emmett, C. F., & Stearmer, S. M. (2009). The Womanstats project database: Advancing an empirical research agenda. Journal of Peace Research, 46(6), 839–851.Google Scholar
  15. Cho, S. Y. (2012). Modeling for determinants of human trafficking (Economics of Security Working Paper, 70).Google Scholar
  16. Cho, S. Y., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2012). Compliance with the anti-trafficking protocol. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(2), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cho, S. Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2013). Does legalized prostitution increase human trafficking? World Development, 41, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cho, S. Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2014). Determinants of anti-trafficking policies: Evidence from a new index. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(2), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cingranelli, D. L., & Richards, D. L. (2007). Measuring government effort to respect economic and social human rights: A peer benchmark. In Economic rights: Conceptual, measurement, and policy issues (pp. 214–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cingranelli, D. L., & Richards, D. L. (2010). The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) human rights data project. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(2), 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Corner, L. (2005). Gender-sensitive and pro-poor indicators of good governance. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).Google Scholar
  22. Danailova-Trainor, G., & Belser, P. (2006). Globalization and the illicit market for human trafficking: An empirical analysis of supply and demand. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  23. Davenport, C., & Armstrong, D. A. (2004). Democracy and the violation of human rights: A statistical analysis from 1976 to 1996. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 538–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Della Giusta, M. (2010). Simulating the impact of regulation changes on the market for prostitution services. European journal of law and economics, 29(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farley, M. (2006). Prostitution, trafficking, and cultural amnesia: What we must not know in order to keep the business of sexual exploitation running smoothly. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 18, 109.Google Scholar
  26. Fossett, M. A., & Kiecolt, K. J. (1991). A methodological review of the sex ratio: Alternatives for comparative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 941–957.Google Scholar
  27. Fulu, E., Warner, X., Miedema, S., Jewkes, R., Roselli, T., & Lang, J. (2013). Why do some men use violence against women and how can we prevent it? Quantitative findings from the United Nations Multi-country Study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: UNDP, UNFPA, UN Women and UNV.Google Scholar
  28. Gallagher, A. (2002). Trafficking, smuggling and human rights: Tricks and treaties. Forced Migration Review, 12(25), 8–36.Google Scholar
  29. Gallagher, A. T. (2008). Human rights and human trafficking: Quagmire or firm ground? A response to James Hathaway. Virginia Journal of International Law, 49, 789.Google Scholar
  30. Geske Dijkstra, A. (2006). Towards a fresh start in measuring gender equality: A contribution to the debate. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2012). The global gender gap index of 2012 (The Global Gender Gap Report, pp. 3–27).Google Scholar
  32. Hudson, V. M., Bowen, D. L., & Nielsen, P. L. (2011). What is the relationship between inequity in family law and violence against women? Approaching the issue of legal enclaves. Politics & Gender, 7(4), 453–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyland, K. E. (2001). The impact of the protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children. Human Rights Brief, 8(2), 12.Google Scholar
  34. Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy—And how can we measure it? Political Science and Politics, 36(1), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2013). The law and economics of international sex slavery: Prostitution laws and trafficking for sexual exploitation. European Journal of Law and Economics, 35(1), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kempadoo, K., & Doezema, J. (Eds.). (1998). Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, and redefinition. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. (1999). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78(1), 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klasen, S., & Schüler, D. (2009). Reforming the gender-related development index (GDI) and the gender empowerment measure (GEM): Some specific proposals (No. 186). Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
  39. Knack, S. (2004). Does foreign aid promote democracy? International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knutsen, C. H. (2010). Measuring effective democracy. International Political Science Review, 31(2), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LaGraffe, D. (2012). The youth bulge in Egypt: An intersection of demographics, security, and the Arab spring. Journal of Strategic Security, 5(2), 901–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr IV, T. R. (2012). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2010. Dataset user’s manual. Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
  43. Mathews, T. J., & Hamilton, B. E. (2005). Trend analysis of the sex ratio at birth in the United States. National Vital Statistics Reports, 53(20), 1–17.Google Scholar
  44. Mills, M. (2010). Gender roles, gender (in)equality and fertility: An empirical test of five gender equity indices. Canadian Studies in Population, 37(3–4), 445–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morrisson, C., & Jütting, J. P. (2005). Women’s discrimination in developing countries: A new data set for better policies. World Development, 33(7), 1065–1081.Google Scholar
  46. Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
  47. Neumayer, E. (2002). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Permanyer, I. (2013). Are UNDP indices appropriate to capture gender inequalities in Europe? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 927–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raymond, J. G. (2002). The new UN trafficking protocol. In Women’s studies international forum (Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 491–502). Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raymond, J. G. (2004). Ten reasons for not legalizing prostitution and a legal response to the demand for prostitution. Journal of Trauma Practice, 2(3–4), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rohwer, A. (2009). Measuring corruption: A comparison between the transparency international’s corruption perceptions index and the World Bank’s worldwide governance indicators. CESifo DICE Report, 7(3), 42–52.Google Scholar
  52. Seguino, S. (2000). Gender inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28(7), 1211–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shelley, L. (2003). Trafficking in women: The business model approach. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(1), 119–131.Google Scholar
  54. Skaaning, S. E. (2008). The civil liberty dataset: Conceptualization and measurement. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y. T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017). Women’s political empowerment: A new global index, 1900–2012. World Development, 94, 321–335.Google Scholar
  56. The World Bank Open Data. (2013). Available at data.worldbank.org.
  57. Thomas, M. A. (2010). What do the worldwide governance indicators measure? The European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Treier, S., & Jackman, S. (2008). Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Staveren, I. (2013). To measure is to know? A comparative analysis of gender indices. Review of Social Economy, 71(3), 339–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vanhanen, T. (2000). A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37(2), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2009). Political culture, mass beliefs, and value change. Democratization, 126–144.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Ravlik
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for the Study of DemocracyLeuphana UniversityLüneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations