Securitization in Protracted Conflict Environments: A Theoretical Perspective

  • Constantinos AdamidesEmail author
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)


This chapter presents the theoretical framework of the book based on the limitations and underdeveloped areas of the securitization as presented in Chapter  1. Specifically, the focus is on the importance of pivotal events and the subsequent unchallenged periods, which result in the development of routinized, and frequently institutionalization, securitization. Furthermore, it presents two new concepts, namely horizontal and bottom-up securitization, and their importance in the conflict-ridden social context where the audiences have a much more important role to play than simply being the ‘judges’ of successful or unsuccessful securitizing acts. Lastly, the theoretical contribution extends in the field of visual securitization in protracted conflicts and how images can have a particularly important impact due to their ability to act as stark reminders of the threats that already dominate the environment.


Pivotal events Routinized securitization Institutionalized securitization Bottom-up securitization Horizontal securitization Audience role 


  1. Abulof, Uriel. 2014. Deep Securitization and Israel’s “Demographic Demon”. International Political Sociology 8: 396–415, 400–401.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, Michele G., Shana Levin, and P.J. Henry. 2005. Image Theory, Social Identity and Social Dominance: Structural Characteristics and Individual Motives Underlying International Images. Political Psychology 26 (1): 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brink, Cornelia. 2000. Secular Icons: Looking at Photographs from Nazi Concentration Camps. History & Memory 12 (1): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browning, Christopher S., and Pertti Joenniemi. Ontological Security, Self-articulation and the Securitization of Identity. Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 31–47.Google Scholar
  5. Buzan, Barry. 1991. People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-cold Era. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, David. 2004. Horrific Blindness: Images of Death in Contemporary Media. Journal for Cultural Research 8 (1): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawford, Beverly, and Ronnie D. Lipschutz. 1997. Discourses of War: Security and the Case of Yugoslavia. In Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, ed. Michael C. Williams and Keith Krause. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Economist. 2019. Populists Fall Short of Expectations in the European Elections, May 26. Available at Accessed June 12, 2019.
  10. Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism. International Organization 50 (2): 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen, Lene. 2011. The Politics of Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis: A Post-structuralist Perspective. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hermann, Richard. 1985. Perceptions and Behavior in Soviet Foreign Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hermann, R., P.E. Tetlock, and P.S. Visser. 1999. Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework. American Political Science Review 93: 553–573.Google Scholar
  15. Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. J. Peter Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kowert, Paul, and Jeffrey Legro. 1996. Norms, Identity, and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. J. Peter Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, Liam. 2008. Securing Vision: Photography and US Foreign Policy. Media, Culture & Society 30 (3): 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kriesberg, Louis. 1998. Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Resolution. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  20. Lake, David A., and Donald Rothchild. 1996. Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict. International Security 21 (2): 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Legro, Jeffrey W. 1997. Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the “Failure” of Internationalism. International Organization 51 (1): 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDonald, Matt. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mirzoeff, Nicholas. 2000. An Introduction to Visual Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, Audra. 2015. Ontological (In)security and Violent Peace in Northern Ireland. In Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties, ed. Bahar Rumelili. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Mitchell, W.J.T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006a. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370.Google Scholar
  27. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006b. Anchoring Europe’s Civilizing Identity: Habits, Capabilities, and Ontological Security. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 270–285.Google Scholar
  28. Rothman, Jay, and Marie L. Olson. 2001. From Interests to Identities: Towards a New Emphasis in Interactive Conflict Resolution. Journal of Peace Research 38 (3): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rumelili, Bahar. 2015. Ontological (In)security and Peace Anxieties: A Framework for Conflict Resolution. In Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties, ed. Bahar Rumelili. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, Michael C. 2003. Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams, Michael C. 2007. Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Cyprus News Agency (CNA). 2019. “«Δεύτερη εισβολή» οι δραστηριότητες της Τουρκίας στην κυπριακή ΑΟΖ, λέει ο Πρόεδρος Αναστασιάδης” [“Second Invasion” the Turkish activities in the Cypriot EEZ, says President Anastasiades], May 6. Available at Accessed June 7, 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations