Advertisement

Online Learning

  • Florence Martin
  • Anthony Karl Betrus
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter will review the development of digital media used for Online Learning. We will provide an overview of the various delivery methods for online learning to frame the context in which the materials will be used. Then we will discuss the common features of various lecture capture tools used to create digital materials for online learning. We will provide an overview of the characteristics and features of various Learning Management Systems (LMS) and various Synchronous Online Tools that allow users to interface with the materials and interact with the instructor other learners. We will also provide an overview of relative advantages and disadvantages of using third party tools and Open Educational Resources (OER) to enhance online learning environments. Finally, we will discuss how design standards influence the creation and integration of digital learning materials in online environments.

Keywords

Online delivery methods Digital media features Digital media creation standards Digital media tools Open educational resources 

References

  1. AECT. (2012). AECT Standards retrieved from https://www.aect.org/docs/AECTstandards2012.pdf.
  2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning: Distance education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson survey research group.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, S., Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2018). Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends, 62(1), 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elearning (2019). Implementing E-Learning? What standards should you consider? Retrieved from https://trainingindustry.com/articles/e-learning/implementing-e-learning-what-standards-should-you-consider/.
  5. Gunawardena, C., & Jung, I. (2014). Perspectives on culture and online learning. In I. Jung & C. Gunawardena (Eds.), Culture and online learning: Global perspectives and research (pp. 1–14). Sterling: Stylus.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, J. (2016). 10 guidelines to emphasize visual design in your eLearning. Retrieved online from https://elearningindustry.com/10-guidelines-emphasize-visual-design-in-your-elearning.
  7. iNACOL. (2019). iNACOL standards for Quality Online Teaching. Retrieved from https://www.inacol.org/resource/inacol-national-standards-for-quality-online-teaching-v2/.
  8. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin, F., & Oyarzun, B. (2017). Distance learning. In R. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/distance_learning
  10. Martin, F., & Parker, M. A. (2014). Use of synchronous virtual classrooms: Why, who, and how. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 192–210.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, F. (2011). Instructional design and the importance of instructional alignment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 35(12), 955–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mayer, R. E. (1994). Visual aids to knowledge construction: Building mental representations from pictures and words. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 108, pp. 125–138). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  13. Quality Matters. (2019). QM rubrics and standards. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards.
  14. WCAG. (2019). (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florence Martin
    • 1
  • Anthony Karl Betrus
    • 2
  1. 1.University of North Carolina CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.State University of New York at PotsdamPotsdamUSA

Personalised recommendations