Advertisement

Challenges of Examining Assumptions

  • Apollo M. Nkwake
Chapter

Abstract

The process of explicating assumptions requires an analytical stakeholder response rather than an empathetic, responsive, and intuitive stance. Developing and questioning the underlying assumptions of a program’s theory can be threatening to stakeholders for reasons outlined in this chapter. Therefore, the process should be done sensitively and collaboratively, so that it strengthens the program without dampening enthusiasm or weakening stakeholder commitment.

Keywords

Assumptions explication challenges Nature of implicit assumptions Implications of assumption-explication Unknown unknowns Prioritizing assumptions 

References

  1. Kaplan, S. A., & Garrett, K. E. (2005). The use of logic models by community-based initiatives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. McCoy, M., & Hargie, O. D. W. (2001). Evaluating evaluation: Implications for assessing quality. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 14(7), 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Scriven, M. (1986). New frontiers of evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 7(7), 7–39. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1177/109821408600700102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaw, I., & Crompton, I. A. (2003). Theory, like mist on spectacles, obscures vision. Evaluation, 9(2), 192–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Weiss, C. H. (2000). Which links in which theories shall we evaluate? New Directions for Evaluation, 87, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Weiss, C. H. (2011). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In K. Fulbright-Anderson, A. C. Kubrisch, & J. P. Connell (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, Vol. 2: Theory, measurement and analysis (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Weiss, C. H. (2016). How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway?. Evaluation Review, 21(4), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Apollo M. Nkwake
    • 1
  1. 1.Questions LLCMarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations