Advertisement

Assessing Crop Yield and Risk: A New Method for Calculating Insurance Based on Rainfall

  • Fabian Capitanio
  • Azzam Hannoon
  • Jeffrey DarvilleEmail author
  • Alessio Faccia
Conference paper
  • 10 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore a new method for data analysis that could be used for insurance calculations. In many agricultural nations rainfall per year and per annual quarter are good indications of the productive capacity in farmland. Essentially, there is a curvilinear relationship between rain and crop yield. The goldilocks zone varies by region and product, however, every farmer and minister of agriculture fears drought and/or flood. A Copula Quantile Regression (CQR) approach provides a novel approach to estimate the dependence of a function of the yield with respect to climate factors. This is then combined with quantile regression for nonlinear optics. This approach utilizes “Big Data” modeling and analytics to draw upon the wealth of information contained in the RICA databases. This study assesses variables such as the share of land covered by a sprinkler system, altitude, fragmentation of land, production intensity, rain, and temperature. It was found that this method provides a simpler and more flexible approach to analyze complex ecological, geological, economic, and sociological factors that impact business and commerce through risk management, strategic planning, and insurance.

Keywords

Crop yield and risk insurance Risk management Strategic planning Agriculture Climate factors 

References

  1. Alderman, H., & Haque, T. (2007). Insurance against covariate shocks: The role of index-based insurance in social protection in low-income countries of Africa. World Bank Working Paper No. 95.Google Scholar
  2. Antle, J. (1987). Econometric estimation of producers’ risk attitudes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arias, O. V., Garrido, A., Villeta, M., & Tarquis, A. M. (2018). Homogenisation of a soil properties map by principal component analysis to define index agricultural insurance policies. Geoderma, 311, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, B. J., & Mahul, O. (2007). Weather index insurance for agriculture and rural areas in lower-income countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(5), 1241–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, T. P., Pierce, D. W., Hidalgo, H. G., Bonfils, C., Santer, B. D., Das, T., Bala, G., Wood, A. W., Nozawa, T., Mirin, A. A., Cayan, D. R., & Dettinger, M. D. (2008). Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the Western United States. Science. 319(5866), 1080–1083.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, E., & Schmitz, B. (2008). Weather-based instruments in the context of whole-farm risk management. Agricultural Finance Review, 68(1), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birthal, P., Roy, D., & Negi, D. (2015). Assessing the impact of crop diversification on farm poverty in India. World Development, 72(10), 1016.Google Scholar
  8. Bouyé, E., & Salmon, M. (2013). Dynamic copula quantile regressions and tail area dynamic dependence in Forex markets. In Copulae and multivariate probability distributions in finance (pp. 125–154). Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chowdhury, S. P., Uhl, J., Grosch, R., Alqueres, S., Pittroff, S., Dietel, K., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Borriss, R., & Hartmann, A. (2016). (Chowdhury et al 2015).Google Scholar
  10. Clover, A. T., & Nieuwoudt, W. L. (2003). An economic evaluation of area yield insurance for small-scale cane growers. Development Southern Africa, 20, 293–305.Google Scholar
  11. Dalhaus, T., Musshoff, O., & Finger, R. (2018). Phenology information contributes to reduce temporal basis risk in agricultural weather index insurance. Scientific reports, 8(1), 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faccia, A. (2012). Analisi dei dati RICA finalizzati all’approfondimento del tema della gestione del rischio in agricoltura. Misurazione delle performance finanziarie e patrimoniali delle aziende agrarie e relativa definizione di un modello di rating.Google Scholar
  13. Finger, D., Wüest, A., & Bossard, P. (2013). Effects of oligotrophication on primary production in peri-alpine lakes. Water Resources Research, 49, 4700–4710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glauber, J. W. (2004). Crop insurance reconsidered. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(5), 1179–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groom, M. J., Gray, E. M., & Patricia A. T. (2008). Biofuels and biodiversity: principles for creating better policies for biofuel production. Conservation Biology. 22(3), 602–609.Google Scholar
  16. Hazell, P. B. (1992). The appropriate role of agricultural insurance in developing countries. Journal of International Development, 4(6), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubert, L. J., Golledge, R. G., & Costanzo, C. M. (2010) Generalized procedures for evaluating spatial autocorrelation. Geographical Analysis.Google Scholar
  18. Kapphan, I., Calanca, P., & Holzkämper, A. (2012). Climate change, weather insurance design and hedging effectiveness. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice.Google Scholar
  19. Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 132–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koenker, R. W., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumbhakar, S., & Tveterås, R. (2003). Risk preferences, production risk and firm heterogeneity. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 105(2), 275–293.Google Scholar
  22. Lobell, D. B., & Burke, M. (Eds.). (2010). Climate change and food security. Adapting Agriculture to a Warmer World.Google Scholar
  23. Mahul, O., & Stutley, C. J. (2010). Government support to agricultural insurance: challenges and options for developing countries. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. Moschini, G., & Hennessy, D. (1999). Uncertainty, risk aversion and risk management for agricultural producers. Economic Staff Paper Series. 315.Google Scholar
  25. Mullins, J., Zivin, J. G., Cattaneo, A., Paolantonio, A., & Cavatassi, R. (2018). The adoption of climate smart agriculture: The role of information and insurance under climate change. In Climate Smart Agriculture (pp. 353–383). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Olalekan, A., & Adeyinka, S. (2013). Capital adequacy and banks’ profitability: an empirical evidence from Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. 3(10).Google Scholar
  27. Piearce, T. G. (1984). Earthworm populations in soils disturbed by trampling. Biological Conservation, 29, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Počuča, M., Petrović, Z., & Mrkšić, D. (2018). Insurance in agriculture. Economics of Agriculture, 60(1), 163–177.Google Scholar
  29. Poudel, M. P., Chen, S. E., & Huang, W. C. (2018). Pricing of rainfall index insurance for rice and wheat in Nepal.Google Scholar
  30. Schlenker, W., & Roberts, M. (2006). Nonlinear effects of weather on crop yields: Implications for climate change. Review of Agricultural Economics. 28.Google Scholar
  31. Sidibé, Y., Foudi, S., Pascual, U., & Termansen, M. (2018). Adaptation to climate change in rainfed agriculture in the global south: soil biodiversity as natural insurance. Ecological Economics, 146, 588–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swinton, S., & King, R. (1991). Evaluating robust regression techniques for detrending crop yield data with nonnormal errors. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 446.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1242729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Valdés, A., Hazell, P. B. R., & Pomareda, C. (1986). Crop insurance for agricultural development: Issues and experience. IICA Biblioteca Venezuela.Google Scholar
  34. Vedenov, D., & Barnett, B. (2004). Efficiency of weather derivatives as primary crop insurance instruments. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 29(3), 387–403.Google Scholar
  35. Wang, N., Wang, Z. P., Liang, X. L., Weng, J. F., Lv, X. L., Zhang, D. G., et al. (2016). Identification of loci contributing to maize drought tolerance in a genome-wide association study. Euphytica, 210(2), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zheng, Q., Wang, H. H., & Shi, Q. (2008). Estimating multivariate yield distributions using nonparametric methods. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, July 27–29, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabian Capitanio
    • 1
  • Azzam Hannoon
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Darville
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alessio Faccia
    • 2
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.American University in the Emirates, Dubai International Academic CityDubaiUAE

Personalised recommendations