Adolescents’ Perceptions of the Psychological Distance to Climate Change, Its Relevance for Building Concern About It, and the Potential for Education

  • Moritz GublerEmail author
  • Adrian Brügger
  • Marc Eyer
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


One of the greatest challenges of this century is climate change. Unfortunately, it is still unclear how to motivate people to engage in environmentally friendly behaviour. To be effective, education and communication strategies must take into account people’s perceptions and beliefs. A root difficulty is that the general public tends to perceive climate change as a psychologically distant phenomenon—something that, if at all, happens not here, not now, and not to oneself. In this study, we explored perceptions of psychological distance to climate change with a highly relevant but so far overlooked population—adolescents. Swiss adolescents (N = 587) perceived climate change to be a certain and present risk. However, they perceived climate change to affect other places and other people more than themselves. Regression analysis revealed a significant inverse relationship between distance and concern: respondents who felt psychologically closer to the phenomenon expressed greater concern. The findings contribute to the understanding of how young people perceive climate change, which should assist in designing education strategies to make it more salient for individual behaviour.


Climate change education Young people Psychological distance Climate change concern Sustainable behaviour 



The authors wish to thank the students, schools, and teachers for their participation and for administrative help.


  1. Adams P, Gynnild A (2013) Communicating environmental messages in online media: the role of place. Environ Commun 7(1):113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APA, American Psychological Association (2017) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Author, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballantyne AG, Wibeck V, Neset T-S (2016) Images of climate change—a pilot study of young people’s perceptions of ICT-based climate visualization. Clim Change 134(1):73–85. Scholar
  4. Bar-Anan Y, Liberman N, Trope Y (2006) The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. J Exp Psychol 135(4):609–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brügger A, Dessai S, Devine-Wright P, Morton TA, Pidgeon NF (2015) Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nat Clim Change 5(12):1031–1037. Scholar
  6. Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N (2014) Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 5(3):411–422. Scholar
  7. Corner A, Roberts O, Chiari S, Völler S, Mayrhuber ES, Mandl S, Monson K (2015) How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 6(5):523–534. Scholar
  8. Crocetti E, Rubini M (2017) Communicating personal and social identity in adolescence. In: Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford University Press, USA. Retrieved from ( 29 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  9. ERZ, Department of Education of the Canton of Berne (2018) Education statistics of the Canton of Berne 2017. ERZ, Berne. Retrieved from 29 Jan 2019
  10. Flora JA, Saphir M, Lappé M, Roser-Renouf C, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA (2014) Evaluation of a national high school entertainment education program: the alliance for climate education. Clim Change 127(3):419–434. Scholar
  11. Fløttum K, Dahl T, Rivenes V (2016) Young Norwegians and their views on climate change and the future: findings from a climate concerned and oil-rich nation. J Youth Stud 19(8):1128–1143. Scholar
  12. Gensicke T (2000) Germany in transition. Attitude to life, value orientations, civic commitment. In: Speyer research reports 204. Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung bei der Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften, SpeyerGoogle Scholar
  13. Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66(4):290–302. Scholar
  14. Hair JH, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (eds) (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton L (2018) Self-assessed understanding of climate change. Clim Change 151(2):349–362. Scholar
  16. Harker-Schuch I, Bugge-Henriksen C (2013) Opinions and knowledge about climate change science in high school students. Ambio 42(6):755–766. Scholar
  17. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat Clim Change 6:622–626. Scholar
  18. Huber SG, Lussi I (2016) Value orientations of young adults in Switzerland. In: Huber SG (ed) Young adult survey switzerland. BBL/OFCL/UFCL, Berne, pp. 98–101. Retrieved from 29 Jan 2019
  19. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds). IPCC, Geneva. (Core Writing Team)Google Scholar
  20. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  21. JASP Team (2018) JASP version 0.9 (computer software). University of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones C, Hine DW, Marks ADG (2017) The future is now: reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Anal 37(2):331–341. Scholar
  23. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Change 2:732–735. Scholar
  24. Kerr JR, Wilson MS (2018) Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety. PLOS ONE 13(7):e0200295, 1–17. Scholar
  25. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Edu Res 8(3):239–260. Scholar
  26. Leiserowitz AA (2005) American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25(6):1433–1442. Scholar
  27. Liberman N, Trope Y (2008) The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 322(5905):1201–1205. Scholar
  28. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Change 17(3):445–459. Scholar
  29. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Change 77(1):73–95. Scholar
  30. Maccoby EE (2015) Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In: DeLamater J, Ward A (eds) Handbook of socialization: theory and research, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. McCright AM (2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul Environ 32(1):66–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald RI, Chai HY, Newell BR (2015) Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: an integrative review. J Environ Psychol 44:109–118. Scholar
  33. Milfont T (2012) The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: a one-year longitudinal study. Risk Anal 32(6):1003–1020. Scholar
  34. Monroe MC, Plate RR, Oxarart A, Bowers A, Chaves WA (2017) Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environ Edu Res 1–22. Scholar
  35. Ojala M (2013) Coping with climate change among adolescents: implications for subjective well-being and environmental engagement. Sustainability 5(5):2191–2209. Scholar
  36. Ojala M (2015) Climate change skepticism among adolescents. J Youth Stud 18(9):1135–1153. Scholar
  37. Ojala M (2016) Young people and global climate change: emotions, coping, and engagement in everyday life. In: Ansell N, Klocker N, Skelton T (eds) Geographies of global issues: change and threat. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  38. Ojala M, Lakew Y (2017) Young people and climate change communication. In: (ed) Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. Oxford University Press, USA. Retrieved from 29 Jan 2019
  39. Perera L, Hewege C (2013) Climate change risk perceptions and environmentally conscious behaviour among young environmentalists in Australia. Young Consumers 14(2):139–154. Scholar
  40. Piedmont RL (2014) Inter-item correlations. In: Michalos AC (ed) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  41. Poortinga W, Spence A, Whitmarsh L, Capstick S, Pidgeon NF (2011) Uncertain climate: an investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Glob Environ Change 21(3):1015–1024. Scholar
  42. Scannell L, Gifford R (2013) Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environ Behav 45(1):60–85. Scholar
  43. Schultz P (2002) Inclusion with nature: the psychology of human-nature relations. In: Schmuck P, Schultz WP (eds) Psychology of sustainable development. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  44. Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA (2008) Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. Am J Prev Med 35(5):479–487. Scholar
  45. Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2015) Public perception of climate change: the importance of knowledge and cultural worldviews. Risk Anal 35(12):2183–2201. Scholar
  46. Singh AS, Zwickle A, Bruskotter JT, Wilson R (2017) The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environ Sci Policy 73:93–99. Scholar
  47. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Change 1:46–49. Scholar
  48. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–972. Scholar
  49. Stevenson K, Peterson N (2016) Motivating action through fostering climate change hope and concern and avoiding despair among adolescents. Sustainability 8(1):6. Scholar
  50. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD (2018) Developing a model of climate change behavior among adolescents. Clim Change 151(3):589–603. Scholar
  51. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD (2016) The influence of personal beliefs, friends, and family in building climate change concern among adolescents. Environ Edu Res 1–14. Scholar
  52. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD, Moore SE, Carrier SJ (2014) Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Clim Change 126(3):293–304. Scholar
  53. Stoknes PE (2014) Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox”. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:161–170. Scholar
  54. Tanti C, Stukas AA, Halloran MJ, Foddy M (2011) Social identity change: shifts in social identity during adolescence. J Adolesc 34(3):555–567. Scholar
  55. Tobler C, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2012) Consumers’ knowledge about climate change. Clim Change 114(2):189–209. Scholar
  56. Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117(2):440–463. Scholar
  57. Valdez RX, Peterson MN, Stevenson KT (2018) How communication with teachers, family and friends contributes to predicting climate change behaviour among adolescents. Environ Conserv 45(2):183–191. Scholar
  58. van der Linden S, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A (2015) Improving public engagement with climate change: five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(6):758–763. Scholar
  59. Yang ZJ, Kahlor LA, Griffin DJ (2014) I share, therefore i am: a US—China comparison of college students’ motivations to share information about climate change. Hum Commun Res 40(1):112–135. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research, Development and EvaluationUniversity of Teacher Education BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Climatology Group, Institute of GeographyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Consumer Behaviour, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social SciencesUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  4. 4.Institute for Upper Secondary Teacher EducationUniversity of Teacher Education BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations