Advertisement

Sixty Seconds Above Sixty Degrees: Connecting Arctic and Non-Arctic Classrooms in the Age of Climate Change

  • Mary E. ShortEmail author
  • Laura C. Engel
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Science education literature highlights a need to better understand teachers’ experiences of navigating barriers to implementing climate change education curriculum. This chapter presents findings of a qualitative study of teachers’ perspectives during the facilitation of a digital environmental storytelling project called #60above60, which connects students in Arctic and non-Arctic urban contexts. The focus is on teachers’ cognitive interpretations of the project and broader individuals in climate change education. The results and subsequent discussion in this paper will be useful to people and organizations interested in understanding how teachers and institutions implement curriculum incorporating climate change, sustainability, and student action-oriented instruction.

Keywords

Teachers Environmental education Climate change education Digital storytelling Arctic 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the GW Arctic PIRE project, specifically Dr. Bob Orttung, Binyu Yang, and members of the research team. This project is supported by the National Science Foundation grant (Award #1545913). Authors would like to thank the teachers participating in #60above60.

References

  1. Anderson A (2012) Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. J Educ Sustain Dev 6(2):191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgerding LA, Dagistan M (2018) Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues. J Sci Teacher Educ 29(4):283–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cutter-Mackenzie AN, Payne PG, Reid A (2010) Experiencing environment and place through children’s literature. Environ Educ Res 16(3–4):253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doran PT, Zimmerman MK (2009) Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 90(3):22–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunk RD, Barnes ME, Reiss MJ, Alters B, Asghar A, Carter BE, Conter S, Glaze AL, Hawley PH, Jensen JL, Mead LS, Nadelson LS, Nelson CE, Pobiner B, Scott EC, Shtulman A, Sinatra GM, Southerland SA, Walter EM, Brownell SE, Wiles JR (2019) Evolution education is a complex landscape. Nat Ecol Evol.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0802-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekborg M, Ottander C, Silfver E, Simon S (2013) Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues: a large scale and in-depth study. Res Sci Educ 43(2):599–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engel LC, Siczek MM (2018) A cross-national comparison of international strategies: global citizenship and the advancement of national competitiveness. Compare J Comp Int Educ 48(5):749–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haigh C, Hardy P (2011) Tell me a story—a conceptual exploration of storytelling in healthcare education. Nurse Educ Today 31(4):408–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hestness E, Randy McGinnis J, Riedinger K, Marbach-Ad G (2011) A study of teacher candidates’ experiences investigating global climate change within an elementary science methods course. J Sci Teacher Educ 22(4):351–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhn D (1989) Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychol Rev 96(4):674–689.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lombardi D, Sinatra GM (2013) Emotions about teaching about human-induced climate change. Int J Sci Educ 35(1):167–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Longview Foundation (2008) Teacher preparation for the global age: the imperative for change. Longview Foundation, Silver Spring, MD. Retrieved from http://www.longviewfdn.org/files/44.pdf
  13. Meadows D (2003) Digital storytelling: research-based practice in new media. Vis Commun 2(2):189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Metz KE (1995) Reassessment of developmental constraints on children’s science instruction. Rev Educ Res 65(2):93–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mochizuki Y, Bryan A (2015) Climate change education in the context of education for sustainable development: rationale and principles. J Educ Sustain Dev 9(1):4–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408215569109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.  https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
  17. NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Ortloff DH, Shonia ON (2015) Teacher conceptualizations of global citizenship: global immersion experiences and implications for the empathy/threat dialectic. In: Maguth BM, Hilburn J (eds) The state of global education: learning with the world and its people. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Friends Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Oversby J (2015) Teachers’ learning about climate change education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 167:23–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parkhouse H, Tichnor-Wagner A, Cain JM, Glazier J (2016) “You don’t have to travel the world”: accumulating experiences on the path toward globally competent teaching. Teach Educ 27(3):267–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Plutzer E, McCaffrey M, Hannah AL, Rosenau J, Berbeco M, Reid AH (2016) Climate confusion among US teachers. Science 351(6274):664–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robin BR (2008) Digital storytelling: a powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory Pract 47(3):220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Russ RS, Scherr RE, Hammer D, Mikeska J (2008) Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: a framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Sci Educ 92(3):499–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sadler TD, Amirshokoohi A, Kazempour M, Allspaw KM (2006) Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: teacher perspectives and strategies. J Res Sci Teach 43(4):353–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shepardson DP, Niyogi D, Choi S, Charusombat U (2009) Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environ Educ Res 15(5):549–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shepardson DP, Niyogi D, Choi S, Charusombat U (2011) Students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change. Clim Change 104(3–4):481–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Siczek M, Engel LC (2017) Teachers’ cognitive interpretations of U.S. global education policy. Educ PolicyGoogle Scholar
  28. Smithsonian Science Education Center. Dec 2018. https://ssec.si.edu/global-goals
  29. Sobel D (1996) Beyond ecophobia. Orion Society, Great Barrington, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Sobel D (2005) Place-based education: connecting classrooms & communities. The Orion Society, Great Barrington, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Sobel D (2008) Childhood and nature: design principles for educators. Stenhouse Publishers, Portland, MEGoogle Scholar
  32. Spillane JP, Reiser BJ, Reimer T (2002) Policy implementation and cognition: reframing and refocusing implementation research. Rev Educ Res 72(3):387–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sullivan SMB, Ledley TS, Lynds SE, Gold AU (2014) Navigating climate science in the classroom: teacher preparation, perceptions and practices. J Geosci Educ 62(4):550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations