Advertisement

Developing a Climate Literacy Framework for Upper Secondary Students

  • Inez Harker-SchuchEmail author
  • Michel Watson
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

While changes to our climate become more apparent and prevalent, adequate understanding in the broader public arena of the causes behind this phenomenon continue to be poor and incomplete. Education remains an essential tool for establishing an informed opinion as well as ensuring students are ready to enter society as adults. To this end, this paper explores the development of a climate literacy framework tested at a secondary school in each Australia and Norway. The pedagogy and curriculum are designed to provide a science-based overview of knowledge relating to climate science and climate change in the upper secondary age group. Measuring existing climate literacy at 53.62% (n = 99) we show that, not only are knowledge deficits shared across borders (culture, language, education systems) there are distinct differences in the understanding of domain-specific aspects in climate science. While no difference between the knowledge domains for the domains related to climate science, there were statistically significant differences in those domains related to drivers of natural climate variation and the impacts and consequences associated with climate change. Furthermore, our findings suggest that, while climate change is taught in secondary school in these two countries, very little improvement in understanding regarding the scientific is made during the secondary school period. We argue that too much focus is put on the consequences and impacts of climate change in the secondary classroom and too little effort if made to improve climate literacy in the physical science basis of natural climate variation and the physical causes and mechanisms underlying climate science. Our study supports previous research which shows that the consequences and impacts of climate change should be only taught after the physical science basis of climate change has been learnt. Our findings also support previous research that recommends that climate literacy interventions should begin in early adolescence and traverse the climate science curriculum in the following order: KD1: Earth in the solar system; KD2: Greenhouse Gas molecules; KD3: Albedo; KD4: Earth’s atmosphere before introducing KD5: natural climate variability; KD6: Feedbacks and climate instability; and KD7: Anthropogenic emissions. By teaching climate science in this way, we will ensure our youth are adequately informed about the issue prior to their emergence into society and we may reduce worldview bias and post-fact rhetoric.

Keywords

Climate literacy Secondary climate education Knowledge domains Climate change curriculum Climate change pedagogy 

References

  1. Arnold A, Böhm G, Corner A, Mays C, Pidgeon N, Poortinga W, Tvinnereim E et al (2016) European perceptions of climate change (EPCC): socio-political profiles to inform a cross-national survey in France, Germany, Norway and the UK. Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10375-3
  2. Bacharach V, Baumeister A, Furr RM (2003) Racial and gender science achievement gaps in secondary education. J Genet Psychol 164(1):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett J, Adger WN (2007) Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Polit Geogr 26(6):639–655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bengtsson SEL, Barakat B, Muttarak R (2018) The role of education in sustainable development. Adv Educ 32.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ai.v32i1.22298
  5. Biggs JB, Collis KF (1982) Evaluating the quality of learning—the SOLO taxonomy. Academic Press, Switzerland: New York.  https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10375-3
  6. Bobbitt F (1918) The curriculum. Houghton Mifflin Company, Chicago, US.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodzin AM, Fu Q (2013) The effectiveness of the geospatial curriculum approach on urban middle-level students’ climate change understandings. J Sci Educ Technol 23(4):575–590.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9478-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryce S, Frank N (2014) What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Glob Environ Change 24:389–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brysse K, Oreskes N, O’Reilly J, Oppenheimer M (2013) Climate change prediction: erring on the side of least drama? Glob Environ Change 23(1):327–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho LC, Rego C, Lucas MR, Sánchez-Hernández MI, Viana ABN (2019) New paths of entrepreneurship development. Springer International Publishing AG, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Case R (1985) Intellectual development: birth to adulthood. Academic Press, Orlando, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman HA, Anderson AK (2013) Things rank and gross in nature: a review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychol Bull 139(2):300–327.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Checkoway B, Allison T, Montoya C (2005) Youth participation in public policy at the municipal level. Child Youth Serv Rev 27(10):1149–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Checkoway B, Richards-Schuster K, Abdullah S, Aragon M, Facio E, Figueroa L, White A et al (2003) Young people as competent citizens. Commun Dev J 38(4):298–309.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/38.4.298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark D, Ranney MA, Felipe J (2013) Knowledge helps: mechanistic information and numeric evidence as cognitive levers to overcome stasis and build public consensus on climate change. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp 2070–2075Google Scholar
  16. Corner A, Groves C (2014) Breaking the climate change communication deadlock. Nat Publ Group 4(9):743–745.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corner A, Roberts O, Chiari S, Völler S, Mayrhuber ES, Mandl S, Monson K (2015) How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Clim Change 6(5):523–534.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353Google Scholar
  18. Crayne JA (2015 Teaching climate change: pressures and practice in the middle school science classroom. University of Oregon Graduate School.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  19. De Bourmont M, Martindale D (2015) Coming of age in the age of extinction. In These Times 39(9):20. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=8gh&AN=8204265&site=ehost-live
  20. Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24:56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Toulmin C et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967):812–8.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guskey TR (2015) Mastery learning. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, vol 14, 2nd edn. Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26039-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harker-schuch I (2019) Why is early adolescence so pivotal in the climate change communication and education arena? In: Climate change and the role of education. Lincoln, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Harker-Schuch I, Bugge-Henriksen C (2013) Opinions and knowledge about climate change science in high school students. Ambio 42(6):755–766.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0388-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harker-Schuch I, Mills F, Lade SJ, Colvin R (2019a) CO2peration—structuring a 3D interactive digital game to improve climate literacy in the 12–13-year-old age group (currently under review). Comput EducGoogle Scholar
  26. Harker-Schuch I, Mills F, Lade SJ, Colvin R (2019b) Opinions of 12 to 13-year-olds in Austria and Australia on the worry, cause and imminence of climate change (currently under review)Google Scholar
  27. Harker-schuch I, Mills F, Lade SJ, Colvin R et al (2019c) Toward a climate literacy framework: developing knowledge domains and a cause-based climate science curriculum in the 12–13-year age group (currently under review)Google Scholar
  28. Head L, Harada T (2017) Keeping the heart a long way from the brain: the emotional labour of climate scientists. Emot Space Soc 24:34–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2017.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hess DJ, Collins BM (2018) Climate change and higher education: assessing factors that affect curriculum requirements. J Clean Prod 170:1451–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Higgins K (2016) Post-truth: a guide for the perplexed. Nature 540(7631):9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/540009aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ho E, Clarke A, Dougherty I (2015) Youth-led social change: topics, engagement types, organizational types, strategies, and impacts. Futures 67:52–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaspal R, Nerlich B (2014) When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Publ Underst Sci 23(2):122–141.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512440219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen FE, Nutt AE (2015) The teenage brain: a neuroscientist’s survival guide to raising adolescents and young adults, 1st edn. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones MG, Howe A, Rua MJ (2000) Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Sci Educ 84(2):180–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahan DM (2013) Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgem Decis Mak 424(107):407–424.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2182588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14(2):147–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Change 2(10):732–735.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarus RJ (2009) Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Rev 94:1153–1234. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/159
  39. Le Treut H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, Ding Y, Mauritzen C, Mokssit A, Prather M (2007) Historical overview of climate change science. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Miller HL et al (eds) The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp 93–127. Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leviston Z, Greenhill M, Walker I (2015) Australian attitudes to climate change: 2010–2014. CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  41. Leviston Z, Price J, Malkin S, Mccrea R (2014) Fourth annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: interim report, Jan 2014Google Scholar
  42. Lewandowsky S, Oreskes N, Risbey JS, Newell BR, Smithson M (2015) Seepage: climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community. Glob Environ Change 33:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lima ML, Castro P (2005) Cultural theory meets the community: worldviews and local issues. J Environ Psychol 25(1):23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lorenzoni I, Jones M, Turnpenny JR (2007) Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK. Futures 39(1):65–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Makkreel RA (1975) Dilthey—philosopher of the human studies, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  46. McNeill KL, Vaughn MH (2012) Urban high school students’ critical science agency: conceptual understandings and environmental actions around climate change. Res Sci Educ 42(2):373–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9202-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milér T, Sládek P (2011) The climate literacy challenge. In: Procedia Soc Behav Sci 12:150–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller PH, Blessing JS, Schwartz S (2006) Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. Int J Sci Educ 28(4):363–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moser SC, Dilling L (2012) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: Oxford handbook climate change and society.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0011Google Scholar
  50. New M, Liverman D, Schroeder H, Schroder H, Anderson K (2011) Four degrees and beyond: the potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Philos Trans Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1934):6–19.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it” visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30(3):355–379.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ojala M (2015) Hope in the face of climate change: associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. J Environ Educ 46(3):133–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oreskes N, Conway E (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Pearson RG (2006) Climate change and the migration capacity of species. Trends Ecol Evol 21(3):111–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piaget J (1972) Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Hum Dev 51(1):40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Porten-Cheé P, Eilders C (2015) Spiral of silence online: how online communication affects opinion climate perception and opinion expression regarding the climate change debate. Stud Commun Sci 15(1):143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Porter D, Weaver AJ, Raptis H (2012) Assessing students’ learning about fundamental concepts of climate change under two different conditions. Environ Educ Res 18(5):665–686.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.640750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Potter E, Oster C (2008) Communicating climate change: public responsiveness and matters of concern. Media Int Aust 127:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rittel HW, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryghaug M, Skjølsvold TM (2016) Climate change communication in Norway. In: Storch H (ed) Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. Oxford University Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.453
  61. Schäfer MS, Fox E, Rau H (2016) Climate change communication in Germany 1:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shao W (2017) Weather, climate, politics, or God? Determinants of American public opinions toward global warming. Environ Polit 26(1):71–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1223190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shepardson DP, Niyogi D, Choi S, Charusombat U (2010) Students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change. Clim Change 104(3–4):481–507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9786-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2015) Public perception of climate change: the importance of knowledge and cultural worldviews. Risk Anal 35(12):2183–2201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M, Arvai J (2016) Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nat Clim Change 6:759–762.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stern PC (2012) Psychology: fear and hope in climate messages. Nat Clim Change 2(8):572–573.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevenson K, Peterson N, Bondell H, Moore S, Carrier S (2014) Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Clim Change 126(3–4):293–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1228-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Susanne C, Moser LD (2004) Making climate hot: communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment 46(10):32–46Google Scholar
  69. Thackeray R, Hunter M (2010) Empowering youth: use of technology in advocacy to affect social change. J Comput Mediat Commun 15(4):575–591.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01503.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Torney-Purta J, Lehmann R, Oswald H, Schulz W (2001) In: Wagemake P (ed) Citizenship and education in 28 countries. Eburon Publishers, DelftGoogle Scholar
  71. Waldmann S (2018) New climate report actually understates threat, some researchers argue. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7128
  72. Weingart P, Engels A, Pansegrau P (2000) Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Publ Underst Sci 9(3):261–283.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wetters K (2008) The opinion system: impasses of the public sphere from Hobbes to Habermas. Fordham University Press, New York. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/anuau/home.action?force=1/docDetail.action?docID=10586791

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Research School of Population HealthThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations