Advertisement

Policy-Based Consensus Data Aggregation for the Internet of Things

  • Firas Al-Doghman
  • Zenon ChaczkoEmail author
  • Alina Rakhi Ajayan
Conference paper
Part of the Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics book series (TIEI, volume 15)

Abstract

The new trend of the Internet of Things brings a whole breed of opportunities and applications. Within it, a massive amount of data coming from heterogeneous sources travel in a bidirectional way. Data aggregation is one of the most efficient ways to mitigate Big Data. However, using one type of aggregation within a net-work at all times is not an optimal option. Various network situations require different aggregation functions at different times. We introduce a policy-based data aggregation framework that can handle this issue by referring to a policy when executing the aggregation strategy. An agreement process is used to reach consensus about the aggregation function that is to be applied on the network (or part of it) at a specific time. Participants are to negotiate the policy terms based on the current network status and the nature of the coming requests. The framework represents a promising scope for fully automated IoT.

Keywords

Data aggregation Internet of Things IoT Consensus Framework 

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Doghman, F., Chaczko, Z., Ajayan, A.R., Klempous, R.: A review on fog computing technology. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics’ SMC, pp. 1525–1530 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Doghman, F., Chaczko, Z., Jiang, J.: Review of aggregation algorithms for the internet of things. In: 25th International Conference On Systems Engineering (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altuzarra, A., Moreno-Jimenez, J.M., Salvador, M.: A Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182(1), 367–382 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Arieh, D., Chen, Z.: Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measures for autocratic decision making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. (3), 558–568 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dong, Q., Saaty, T.L.: An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 23(3), 362–374 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 32(3), 394–402 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ignacio Javier Perez, I.J., Francisco Javier Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A mobile decision support system for dynamic group decision-making problems. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.-Part A: Syst. Hum. 40(6), 1244–1256 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang, J., Chaczko, Z., Al-Doghman, F., Narantaka, W.: New LQR protocols with intrusion detection schemes for IOT security. In: 2017 25th International Conference on Systems Engineering (ICSEng), pp. 466–474 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laliwala, Z.: Policy-based services aggregation in grid business process. In: India Conference (INDICON), 2009 Annual IEEE 18 Dec 2009, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Multicriteria Group Decision-making, Zhang, Z., Pedrycz, W.: Intuitionistic multiplicative group analytic hierarchy process and its use in multicriteria group decision-making. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 1–13 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parresol, B.R.: Modeling multiplicative error variance: an example predicting tree diameter from stump dimensions in baldcypress. For. Sci. 39(4), 670–679 (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rossi, E.F.: MICHELE In -network aggregation techniques for wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 70–87 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saaty, T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 234–281 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting resource allocation (1980)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sasirekha, S., Swamynathan, S.: A comparative study and analysis of data aggregation techniques in WSN. 8, 1–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shen, H., Zhu, Z.: Efficient mean estimation in log-normal linear models. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 138(3), 552–567 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Firas Al-Doghman
    • 1
  • Zenon Chaczko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alina Rakhi Ajayan
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and ITUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations