Advertisement

Simulation of Flow Profile Response to Alternate Bar Formation in Rivers

  • Mohd Zulkhairi Mat SallehEmail author
  • Zulkiflee Ibrahim
  • Mazlin Jumain
  • Radzuan Saari
  • Muhammad Farid Muhammad Fathullah
  • Zulhilmi Ismail
  • Muhammad Hidayat Jamal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

Alternate bars are common in alluvial rivers. The formation of alternate bars is derived from the instability of flow and sediment in the channel. The formation of the alternate bars causes the changes in hydrodynamics condition in the channel. This study presents the analysis on the impact of alternate bar formation on the characteristic of flow in the channel. The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of alternate bars on the flow distribution. The study was observed through 2D computer simulation analysis by using Nays2DH solver in iRIC software. The length and width of the channel used were 12 and 0.5 m, respectively. The channel bed was initially set to be flat. The discharge was kept constant with different sediment sizes. The study found that the direction of the velocity of water was diverted away from the alternate bars after these bars were formed. Furthermore, the variation of sediment size does not majorly affect the conditions of the alternate bar; thus not also affected the flow profile. However, the velocity was progressively increased from upstream to downstream in the channel with a bigger size of bed material. Additionally, the velocity also was higher at the center but lowered on both sides of the channel. The profiles of velocity were mainly parallel with the bed level, where the velocity was higher as the bed level increased.

Keywords

Alternate bars Flow profile Sediment River Velocity distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is a collaborated research between Universiti Teknologi MARA Pasir Gudang Branch and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. The research was funded under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) of reference FRGS/1/2018/TK01/UTM/02/9. We would like to acknowledge to all who involved directly and indirectly in this project, especially to UiTM Pasir Gudang and UTM for providing us research facilities and manpower.

References

  1. 1.
    Bywater-reyes S, Diehl RM, Wilcox AC (2018) The influence of a vegetated bar on channel-bend flow dynamics. Earth Surf Dyn 6:487–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colombini M, Seminara G, Tubino M (1987) Finite-amplitude alternate bars. J Fluid Mech 181(1):213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cordier F, Tassi P, Claude N, Crosato A, Rodrigues S, Van Bang DP (2019) Numerical study of alternate bars in alluvial channels with non-uniform sediment. Water Resour Res 55(4):2976–3003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cowan WL (1956) Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficient. Agricul Eng 37(7):473–475Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crosato A, Getaneh AA, Desta FB, Uijttewaal WSJ, Le U (2010) Long-duration laboratory experiment of slow development of steady alternate bars. River Flow, 1035–1039Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eekhout JPC, Hoitink AJF, Mosselman E (2013) Field experiment on alternate bar development in a straight sand-bed stream. Water Resour Res 49(12):8357–8369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jourdain C, Claude N, Antoine G, Tassi P (2018) Influence of flood regime on riparian vegetation dynamics in rivers with alternate bars. In: E3S web of conference, vol 02025, pp 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleinhans MG, van den Berg JH (2011) River channel and bar patterns explained and predicted by an empirical and a physics-based method. Earth Surf Proc Land 36(6):721–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lanzoni S, Tubino M (1999) Grain sorting and bar instability. J Fluid Mech 393:149–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Škarpich V, Galia T, Ruman S, Máčka Z (2019) Variations in bar material grain-size and hydraulic conditions of managed and re-naturalized reaches of the gravel-bed Bečva River (Czech Republic). Sci Total Environ 649:672–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tholibon DA, Ariffin J, Abdullah J, Othman Z, Md Nujid M (2018) Volume and widening ratio trends of sand bed channel due to bar formation. Int J Eng Technol 10(2):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohd Zulkhairi Mat Salleh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Zulkiflee Ibrahim
    • 2
  • Mazlin Jumain
    • 2
  • Radzuan Saari
    • 2
  • Muhammad Farid Muhammad Fathullah
    • 1
  • Zulhilmi Ismail
    • 2
  • Muhammad Hidayat Jamal
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MARA Pasir Gudang CampusMasai, JohorMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations