Advertisement

Integrating Structural and Non-structural Flood Management Measures for Greater Effectiveness in Flood Loss Reduction in the Kelantan River Basin, Malaysia

  • Ngai Weng ChanEmail author
  • Aminuddin Ab Ghani
  • Narimah Samat
  • Nik Norma Nik Hasan
  • Mou Leong Tan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

The state of Kelantan in Malaysia is a flood-prone state exposed to seasonal Monsoon rains that bring seasonal floods resulting in significantly losses. Flood management in the state is modelled after the country’s predominant government-centric top-down approach focused on flood-control technologies via structural measures such as multi-purpose dams, levees, embankments, tidal gates, diversion channels and others. These structural measures do not engage the public who fail to understand the measures leading to lack of confidence, misunderstanding and mistrust. This results in ineffectiveness of the measures leading to greater flood losses. In contrast, local communities are familiar with non-structural measures which they have long used to adapt to floods. These measures are also relatively simple, cost-effective and easily implementable over a short period of time. Both measures, however, must engage the public/victims in all phases of the flood disaster cycle. Balancing both types of flood management measures is the key to more effective management. A combination of structural and non-structural measures is the way forward for Kelantan State as it ensures that government structural measures are effectively supported by public-engaged non-structural measures.

Keywords

Structural flood management Non-structural flood management Flood warning Public engagement Flood loss reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the FRGS Research Grant 203.PHUMANITI.6711693 which supported the research that culminated in the publication of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan NW (1995) A contextual analysis of flood hazard management in Peninsular Malaysia. Flood Hazard Research Centre Publication no. 267, Enfield (UK)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Winstedt RO (1927) The great flood, 1926. J Malayan Branch R Asiatic Soc V(II):295–309Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ismail WR, Haghroosta T (2018) Extreme weather and floods in Kelantan state, Malaysia in December 2014. Research in Marine Sciences, vol 3, no 1, pp 231–244Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan NW, Mahamud KRBK, Karim MZA (2016) Assessing different types of flood losses in Kelantan State in Malaysia during the december 2014 flood. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on society, space & environmentGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan NW, Zakaria NA, Ghani AA, Lee LK, Samat N (2017) Social capital and community resilience in coping with flood disasters in Malaysia. In: E-proceedings of the 37th IAHR world congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–18 AugGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azuhan M (2015) Kelantan flood-divine vs. anthropogenic causes. In: Proceedings of national geoscience conference, Kota Bharu, Geological Society of Malaysia, pp 2–5, 31 July–1 AugGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ismail MGH, Chan NW, Zakaria NA, Ghani AA (2015) A review of standard operating procedures (sop) used in flood relief operations during the December 2014 flood in Pahang. In: Proceedings Transformasi Sosial 2015. Fakulti Kemanusiaan, Seni & Warisan Universiti Malaysia Sabah, pp 18–27Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan NW, Tan ML, Ghani AA, Zakaria NA (2019) Sustainable urban drainage as a viable measure of coping with heat and floods due to climate change. In: IOP conference series: earth environmental scienceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghani AA, Chang CK, Leow CS, Zakaria NA (2012) Sungai pahang digital flood mapping: 2007 flood. Int J River Basin Manage 10(2):139–148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan NW (2019) Sustainable urban drainage as a viable measure of coping with heat and floods due to climate change. In: 9th international conference on future environment and energy (ICFEE 2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drdácký M, Slížková Z (2012) Structural strategies and measures reducing flood action on architectural heritage. Risk Anal VIII:249–260Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelman I, Rauken T (2012) The paradigm of structural engineering approaches for river flood risk reduction in Norway. Area 44(2):144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singkran N (2017) Flood risk management in Thailand: shifting from a passive to a progressive paradigm. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 25:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jamrussri S, Toda Y (2017) Simulating past severe flood events to evaluate the effectiveness of nonstructural flood countermeasures in the upper Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand. J Hydrol Reg Stud 10(2017):82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan NW, Parker DJ (1996) Response to dynamic flood hazard factors in Peninsular Malaysia. Geog J 162(3):313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohita MA, Sellub GM (2013) Mitigation of climate change effects through non-structural flood disaster management in Pekan Town, Malaysia. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 85:564–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sinnakaudan SK, Ghani AA, Ahmad MSS, Zakaria NA (2003) Flood risk mapping for Pari River incorporating sediment transport. Environ Modell Software 18(2):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan NW, Samat N, Lee LK, Ghani AA (2015) Role of citizen science in responding to flood disasters: a case study from Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the international conference on “towards urban water security in Southeast Asia: managing the risks of extreme events”, Phnom Penh, Asian Institute of Technology, pp 227–238Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan NW, Roy R, Lai CH, Tan ML (2018) Social capital as a vital resource in flood disaster recovery in Malaysia. Int J Water Resour DevGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hussaini A (2014) A comprehensive urban stormwater management approach in combating flood in Malaysia: an indispensable link for safer, greener and more livable urban environment. In: 13th international conference on urban drainageGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahmud MA, Samat N, Noor NM (2016) Identifying factors influencing urban spatial growth for the George Town Conurbation. Plann Malaysia 14Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chan NW (2002) Flood hazards and disasters in Malaysia: causes, impacts and solutions with respect to river floods. Rivers: towards sustainable development. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, pp 114–127Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghani AA, Zakaria NA, Abdullah R, Yusoff MF, Sidek LM, Kassim AH, Ainan A (2004) Bio-ecological drainage systems (bioecods): concept, design and construction. In: International conference “ICHE 2004—the sixth international conference on hydro-science and engineering”Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zakaria NA, Ghani AA, Abdullah R, Sidek LM, Kassim AH, Ainan A (2004) MSMA—a new urban stormwater management manual for Malaysia. Paper presented in international conference “ICHE 2004—the sixth international conference on hydro-science and engineering”, Brisbane, 30 May–3 June 2004Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kannapiran RKM (2005) A study and evaluation on SMART project, Malaysia. Unpublished dissertation, Course ENG4111 and 4112 Research Project, Bachelor of Engineering (Civil Engineering), University of Southern Queensland, October 2005Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Magilligan FJ, Nislow KH (2005) Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Geomorphology 71(1):61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ismail N (2014) Issues and problems towards the sustainable dam management system in Malaysia. Int J Innovation Manage Technol 5(6):406–411Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Albayati MMA (2014) Prediction of sediment inflow to Kenyir reservoir using combined modeling. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 8(17):33–44Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abidin Z (2006) Overview of dam safety in Malaysia. Jurutera: 22–23Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rokiah TP, Hussain S, Rahim A, Nor M, Ismail H (2014) The level of satisfaction towards flood management system in Kelantan, Malaysia. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit 22(1):257–269Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Starosolszky Ö (1994) Chapter 31: flood control by levees. In: Rossi G, Harmancioğlu N, Yevjevich V (eds) Coping with floods. NATO ASI series (series E: applied sciences), vol 257. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 617–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosenberg M (2019) How the Netherlands reclaimed land from the sea. ThoughtCo, 2 Jan 2019. https://www.thoughtco.com/polders-and-dikes-of-the-netherlands
  33. 33.
    Kundzewicz ZW (2002) Non-structural flood protection and sustainability. Water Int 27(1):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abdullah HK (2002) Integrated river basin management. “Rivers: towards sustainable development”. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Augustine R (2016) Deforestation the main cause of flooding. FMT NewsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ngai Weng Chan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aminuddin Ab Ghani
    • 2
  • Narimah Samat
    • 1
  • Nik Norma Nik Hasan
    • 3
  • Mou Leong Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Geography Section, School of HumanitiesUniversiti Sains Malaysia (USM)PenangMalaysia
  2. 2.River Engineering and Urban Drainage Research Centre, Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  3. 3.School of CommunicationsUniversiti Sains Malaysia (USM)PenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations