Advertisement

Oil Palm Frond (OPF) Based Activated Carbon for Leachate Treatment

  • N. H. Adam
  • M. S. YusoffEmail author
  • H. Halim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

This research focuses on the application of activated carbon made from oil palm frond (OPF) to treat landfill leachate. The studies were performed in batches to investigate the effect of adsorbent dosage and contact time in removing COD, color, and iron (Fe) from Pulau Burung Sanitary Landfill (PBSL) leachate. Significant parameters such as COD, colour, and iron (Fe) were measured using the USEPA Digestion Method, Platinum-Cobalt Standard Method, and Atomic Analyzer Spectroscopy (AAS), respectively. The chemical and physical characteristics of the f the adsorbent were determined by Scanning Electron Spectroscopy (SEM), Elementary Diffraction X-ray (EDX), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR). Results obtained shows the presence of nanopores (412.1–994.6 nm) and oxygen elements (16.76%) on AC’s surface. BET and micropore surface area were 1357.258 and 384.621 m2/g respectively, while pore volume was 0.191 cm3/g. Hydroxyl functional groups were also observed from FTIR analysis. The characteristics of AC prepared resulted in high removal of COD, color, and iron (Fe) were 82.52, 80.25, and 59.25%. This study concluded that AC produced from OPF with phosphoric acid modification is highly potential for adsorption in leachate treatment.

Keywords

Activated carbon Oil palm frond Leachate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge RUI Grant, number: 1001/PAWAM/8014021 for funding this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed MB, Hasan Johir MA, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Nghiem LD, Richardson C, Moni MA, Bryant MR (2019) Activated carbon preparation from biomass feedstock: clean production and carbon dioxide adsorption. J Clean Prod 225:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aljeboree AM, Alshirifi AN, Alkaim AF (2017) Kinetics and equilibrium study for the adsorption of textile dyes on coconut shell activated carbon. Arab J Chem 10:S3381–S3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ao W, Fu J, Mao X, Kang Q, Ran C, Liu Y, Zhang H, Gao Z, Li J, Liu G, Dai J (2018) Microwave-assisted preparation of activated carbon from biomass: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 92:958–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arena N, Lee J, Clift R (2016) Life Cycle Assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells. J Cleaner Prod 125:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bilardi S, Calabrò PS, Greco R, Moraci N (2018) Selective removal of heavy metals from landfill leachate by reactive granular filters. Sci Total Environ 644:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brito MJP, Veloso CM, Bonomo RCF, Fontan RDCI, Santos LS, Monteiro KA (2017) Activated carbons preparation from yellow mombin fruit stones for lipase immobilization. Fuel Process Technol 156:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen W, Gu Z, Wen P, Li Q (2019) Degradation of refractory organic contaminants in membrane concentrates from landfill leachate by a combined coagulation-ozonation process. Chemosphere 217:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chun SE, Whitacre JF (2017) Formation of micro/mesopores during chemical activation in tailor-made nongraphitic carbons. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 251:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deng Y, Jung C, Zhao R, Torrens K, Wu L (2018) Adsorption of UV-quenching substances (UVQS) from landfill leachate with activated carbon. Chem Eng J 350:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dizbay-Onat M, Vaidya UK, Lungu CT (2017) Preparation of industrial sisal fiber waste derived activated carbon by chemical activation and effects of carbonization parameters on surface characteristics. Ind Crops Prod 95:583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Sayed GO, Yehia MM, Asaad AA (2014) Assessment of activated carbon prepared from corncob by chemical activation with phosphoric acid. Water Resour Ind 7–8:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elmouwahidi A, Bailón-García E, Pérez-Cadenas AF, Maldonado-Hódar FJ, Carrasco-Marín F (2017) Activated carbons from KOH and H3PO4-activation of olive residues and its application as supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochim Acta 229:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghani ZA, Yusoff MS, Zaman NQ, Zamri MFMA, Andas J (2017) Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbon from banana pseudo-stem using response surface methodology on removal of color and COD from landfill leachate. Waste Manag 62:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hidayu AR, Mohamad NF, Matali S, Sharifah ASAK (2013) Characterization of activated carbon prepared from oil palm empty fruit bunch using BET and FT-IR techniques. Procedia Eng 68:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hidayu AR, Muda N (2016) Preparation and characterization of impregnated activated carbon from palm kernel shell and coconut shell for CO2 capture. Procedia Eng 148:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hussin MH, Pohan NA, Garba ZN, Kassim MJ, Rahim AA, Brosse N, Yemloul M, Fazita MRN, Haafiz MKM (2016) Physicochemical of microcrystalline cellulose from oil palm fronds as potential methylene blue adsorbents. Int J Biol Macromol 92:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ibrahim I, Hassan MA, Abd-Aziz S, Shirai Y, Andou Y, Othman MR, Ali AAM, Zakaria MR (2017) Reduction of residual pollutants from biologically treated palm oil mill effluent final discharge by steam activated bioadsorbent from oil palm biomass. J Clean Prod 141:122–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Inyinbor AA, Adekola FA, Olatunji GA (2016) Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic modeling of liquid phase adsorption of Rhodamine B dye onto Raphia hookerie fruit epicarp. Water Resour Ind 15:14–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Islam MA, Ahmed MJ, Khanday WA, Asif M, Hameed BH (2017) Mesoporous activated carbon prepared from NaOH activation of rattan (Lacosperma secundiflorum) hydrochar for methylene blue removal. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 138:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar A, Jena HM (2016) Preparation and characterization of high surface area activated carbon from Fox nut (Euryale ferox) shell by chemical activation with H3PO4. Results Phys 6:651–658Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kwiatkowski M, Broniek E (2017) An analysis of the porous structure of activated carbons obtained from hazelnut shells by various physical and chemical methods of activation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 529:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ludwinowicz J, Jaroniec M (2015) Effect of activating agents on the development of microporosity in polymeric-based carbon for CO2 adsorption. Carbon 94:673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mohammad-Pajooh E, Weichgrebe D, Cuff G (2017) Municipal landfill leachate characteristics and feasibility of retrofitting existing treatment systems with deammonification—a full scale survey. J Environ Manag 187:354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montes V, Hill JM (2018) Pore enlargement of carbonaceous materials by metal oxide catalysts in the presence of steam: influence of metal oxide size and porosity of starting material. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 256:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moody CM, Townsend TG (2017) A comparison of landfill leachates based on waste composition. Waste Manag 63:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nasri NS, Hamza UD, Ismail SN, Ahmed MM, Mohsin R (2014) Assessment of porous carbons derived from sustainable palm solid waste for carbon dioxide capture. J Clean Prod 71:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ooi CH, Cheah WK, Sim YL, Pung SY, Yeoh FY (2017) Conversion and characterization of activated carbon fiber derived from palm empty fruit bunch waste and its kinetic study on urea adsorption. J Environ Manag 197:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pastore C, Barca E, Del Moro G, Di Iaconi C, Loos M, Singer HP, Mascolo G (2018) Comparison of different types of landfill leachate treatments by employment of nontarget screening to identify residual refractory organics and principal component analysis. Sci Total Environ 635:984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rashidi NA, Yusup S (2017a) Potential of palm kernel shell as activated carbon precursors through single stage activation technique for carbon dioxide adsorption. J Clean Prod 168:474–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rashidi NA, Yusup S (2017b) A review on recent technological advancement in the activated carbon production from oil palm wastes. Chem Eng J 314:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salman JM (2014) Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbon from palm oil fronds using response surface methodology on removal of pesticides from aqueous solution. Arab J Chem 7:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salman JM, Islam MA, Ahmed MJ (2017) Hierarchical porous activated carbon for supercapacitor derived from corn stalk core by potassium hydroxide activation. Chem Eng J 6:421–428Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sartova K, Omurzak E, Kambarova G, Dzhumaev I, Borkoev B, Abdullaeva Z (2019) Activated carbon obtained from the cotton processing wastes. Diam Relat Mater 91:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shamsuddin MS, Yusoff NRN, Sulaiman MA (2016) Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon produced from kenaf core fiber using H3PO4 activation. Procedia Chem 19:558–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thue PS, Adebayo MA, Lima EC, Sieliechi JM, Machado FM, Dotto GL, Vaghetti JCP, Dias SLP (2016) Preparation, characterization and application of microwave-assisted activated carbons from wood chips for removal of phenol from aqueous solution. J Mol Liq 223:1067–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yakout SM, Sharaf El-Deen G (2016) Characterization of activated carbon prepared by phosphoric acid activation of olive stones. Arab J Chem 9:S1155–S1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yorgun S, Yildiz D (2015) Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from paulownia wood by chemical activation with H3PO4. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 53:122–131Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang B, Xu P, Qiu Y, Yu Q, Ma J, Wu H, Luo G, Xu M, Yao H (2015) Increasing oxygen functional groups of activated carbon with non-thermal plasma to enhance mercury removal efficiency for flue gases. Chem Eng J 263:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations