Advertisement

Comparison Between the Constraints of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and 3D Modelling

  • Lam Tatt SoonEmail author
  • Hasnanywati Hassan
  • Nazirah Zainul Abidin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

This new emerging and innovative concept of Building Information Modelling (BIM) has delivered changes in terms of the efficiency and effectiveness of management in the construction industry. However, several constraints in the implementation of BIM are indicated notably people, process and technological constraints. In Malaysian quantity surveying profession, several quantity surveying firms are developing 3D model for taking-off and cost estimating preparation based on the standard method of measurement owing to the infancy stage of BIM implementation. This is still not a conventional work task in the quantity surveying profession. To promote the usage of 3D modelling which is far different compared to the traditional method, it is crucial to understand the constraints of 3D modelling and BIM. Therefore, this paper aims to compare the constraints of BIM and 3D Modelling in quantity surveying profession. Eleven semi-structure interviews have been conducted with the experienced quantity surveyors who are practising 3D modelling for quantities and cost estimation purposes to collect experts’ comments on the constraints of 3D modelling compared to BIM implementation. The content analysis which focuses on describing and quantifying phenomena is selected as a research analysis method for the diverse empirical data. The research finding indicated that technological constrains are significantly affecting the 3D modelling implementation while people and process constraints are less significant. This research finding serves as a guidance for quantity surveyors who are willing to take initiatives in implementing 3D modelling in quantity surveying profession.

Keywords

Building Information Modelling (BIM) 3D modelling Quantity surveyor Comparison 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to Universiti Sains Malaysia for the Research University (RU) Grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Aranda-Mena G, Crawford J, Chevez A, Froese T (2009) Building information modelling demystified: does it make business sense to adopt bim? Int J Managing Projects Bus 2(3):419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arayici Y, Coates P, Koskela L, Kagioglou M, Usher C, O’reilly K (2011) ‘Bim adoption and implementation for architectural practices’. Structural Surv 7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benge D (2014) Nrm1: cost management handbook, Routledge Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryde D, Broquetas M, Volm JM (2013) The project benefits of building information modelling (bim). Int J Project Manage 31(7):971–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burnard P (1996) Teaching the analysis of textual data: an experiential approach. Nurse Educ Today 16(4):278–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cerovsek T (2011) A review and outlook for a ‘building information model’ (bim): a multi-standpoint framework for technological development. Adv Eng Inform 25(2):224–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi J, Kim H, Kim I (2015) Open bim-based quantity take-off system for schematic estimation of building frame in early design stage. J Comput Des Eng 2(1):16–25Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clifford N, Cope M, Gillespie T, French S (eds) (2016) Key methods in geography. SageGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daengbuppha J, Hemmington N, Wilkes K (2006) Using grounded theory to model visitor experiences at heritage sites: methodological and practical issues. Qual Market Res Int J 9(4):367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Derrick (2018) Inspiring Careers, Perunding Kos Pkt&K. http://www.quantitysurveyorsmalaysia.com/careers/. Accessed on 5 Nov 2018
  11. 11.
    DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF (2006) The qualitative research interview. Med Educ 40(4):314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dossick CS, Neff G (2010) Organizational divisions in bim-enabled commercial construction. J Constr Eng Manage 459Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eadie R, Browne M, Odeyinka H, Mckeown C, Mcniff S (2013) Bim implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: an analysis. Autom Constr 36:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K (2008) Bim handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Wiley, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elo S, Kyngäs H (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62(1):107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gambatese JA, Hallowell M (2011) Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry. Constr Manage Econ 29(6):553–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glodon (2018) Our customers—overesea. http://www-old.glodon.com/en/ourcustomers.aspx. Accessed on 5 Nov 2018
  18. 18.
    Gu N, London K (2010) Understanding and facilitating bim adoption in the AEC industry. Autom Constr 19(8):988–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gu N, Singh V, London K, Brankovic L, Taylor C (2008) Bim: expectations and a reality check. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on computing in civil and building engineering and 2008 international conference on information technology in construction. Tsinghua University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gupta A, Cemesova A, Hopfe CJ, Rezgui Y, Sweet T (2014) A conceptual framework to support solar PV simulation using an open-bim data exchange standard. Autom Constr 37:166–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guthrie J, Petty R, Yongvanich K, Ricceri F (2004) using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. J Intellectual Capital 5(2):282–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hasan A, Eng P, Yolles H (2009) Building information modelling-a primer. Retrieved from www.Canadianconsultingengineer.Com/Issues/Story.Aspx?Aid=1000334326&Type=Print%20archives
  23. 23.
    Irizarry J, Karan EP, Jalaei F (2013) Integrating bim and gis to improve the visual monitoring of construction supply chain management. Autom Constr 31:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khosrowshahi F, Arayici Y (2012) Roadmap for implementation of bim in the UK construction industry. Eng Constr Archit Manage 19(6):610–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Latiffi AA, Mohd S, Kasim N, Fathi MS (2013) Building information modeling (bim) application in Malaysian construction industry. Int J Constr Eng Manage 2(A):1–6Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Migilinskas D, Popov V, Juocevicius V, Ustinovichius L (2013) The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical bim implementation. Procedia Eng 57:767–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Monteiro A, Martins JP (2013) A survey on modeling guidelines for quantity takeoff-oriented bim-based design. Autom Constr 35:238–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Porwal A, Hewage KN (2013) Building information modeling (bim) partnering framework for public construction projects. Autom Constr 31:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Remondino F, El-Hakim S (2006) Image-based 3D modelling: a review. Photogram Rec 21(115):269–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rowlands BH (2005) Grounded in practice: using interpretive research to build theory. Electron J Bus Res Method 3(1):81–92Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sacks R, Eastman CM, Lee G (2004) Parametric 3d modeling in building construction with examples from precast concrete. Autom Constr 13(3):291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarker S, Lau F, Sahay S (2000) Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. ACM Sigmis Database 32(1):38–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith P (2000) Information technology and the QS practice. http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/ajceb/article/view/2276/2389
  34. 34.
    Starks H, Trinidad S (2007) Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res 17(10):1372–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu S, Wood G, Ginige K, Jong SW (2014) A technical review of bim based cost estimating in Uk quantity surveying practice, standards and tools. J Inf Technol Constr (Itcon) 19(31):534–562Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lam Tatt Soon
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hasnanywati Hassan
    • 1
  • Nazirah Zainul Abidin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Housing Building and PlanningUniversiti Sains Malaysia (USM)PenangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Architecture, Building and DesignTaylor’s UniversitySubang JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations