Advertisement

Development of Mode Choice Models for Undergraduate Students in Baghdad City

  • Hanan Adil Khudhair
  • Samer Muayad AlsadikEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

Mode choice is one of the most essential stages in the transportation planning process and it has a direct impact on policy-making decisions. Mode choice models deal very closely with the individual preferences and behavior, thus continues to attract researchers for further investigation of commuter’s choice making process. This study contains a review of various modeling methods of mode choice analysis, the factors that affect the personality of the travelers have been discussed also. Furthermore, it emphasizes on students who have some characteristics of tripmakers that differ from those of other tripmakers. These characteristics are related to their priorities like time importance and safety. In this study, the main purpose was to develop mode choice models for students in three universities in Baghdad city. A questionnaire was designed and distributed at the three universities under study, then behavioral mode-choice models were successfully built and validated. These models pointed that travel cost, gender, travel time, comfort, and safety have their effects on travel modes of utilization. These models will be helpful in travel demand analysis, so it can be considered by related authorities to improve public transit services in order to shift these users from private to public transport, thereby contributing to sustainability.

Keywords

Mode choice Multinomial logit model MNL Soft-computing techniques Transcad University Travel time Travel cost 

References

  1. 1.
    Abuhamoud MAA, Rahmat R, Ismail A (2011) modeling of transport mode in Libya: a binary logit model for government transportation encouragement. Austral J Basic Appl Sci 5(5):1291–1296Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Ahmadi HM (2006) Development of intercity mode choice models for Saudi Arabia Eng Sci 17(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asmael NM, Ahmed Alkawaaz NG (2019) The influence change of private car ownership on patterns of mode choice in Baghdad City. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 518:022025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, 1st edn. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhat CR (2000) Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work travel mode choice modeling. Transp Sci 34(2):228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhat Chandra R, Sardesai Rupali (2006) The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transp Res Part B Methodol 40(9):709–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blamey RK, University of New South Wales School of Economics, Management, and Russell Keith Blamey (1998) Attribute selection in environmental choice modelling studies: the effect of causally prior attributes. School of Economics and Management, University College, University of New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daganzo C (2014) Multinomial probit: the theory and its application to demand forecasting. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Ortúzar JD, Willumsen LG (2002) Modelling transport. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frank L, Bradley M, Kavage S, Chapman J, Lawton TK (2008) Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation 35(1):37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khisty CJ (1997) Transportation engineering: an introduction, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koppelman FS, Wen C-H (2000) The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application. Transp Res Part B Methodol 34(2):75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Martin William A, McGuckin Nancy A (1998) Travel estimation techniques for urban planning, vol 365. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mathew TV, Rao KV (2007) Introduction to transportation engineering-travel demand modeling. In: National programming on technology enhanced learning (NPTEL)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McFadden DL (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Frontiers in econometrics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohammed AA, Joni HH (2015) Evolution the transportation mode from private cars to publics by logit method: a case study in Baghdad. In: The 2nd international conference on buildings, construction and environmental engineering—BCEE2 in the American University of Beirut, LebanonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ratledge EC, Racca DP (2004) Project report for “Factors that affect and/or can alter mode choice”Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sekhar CR (2014) Mode choice analysis: the data, the models and future ahead. Int J Traffic Transp Eng 4(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sekhar CR (2014) Mode choice analysis: the data, the models and future ahead. Int J Traffic Transp Eng 4(3):269–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spear BD (1977) Applications of new travel demand forecasting techniques to transportation planning. A study of individual choice modelsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tejaswi GP, Amarendra Kumar S, Aramesh M, Kumar A (2015) Development of mode choice models using multinomial logit approach in Hyderabad cityGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    TransCAD Software. TransCAD Transportation Software. TransCAD. Retrieved (https://www.caliper.com/tcovu.htm)
  24. 24.
    Van Wee B, Holwerda H, Van Baren R (2002) Preferences for modes, residential location and travel behaviour. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 2(4)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhao F, Li M-T, Chow L-F, Shen LD (2002) FSUTMS mode choice modeling: factors affecting transit use and access. National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FloridaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Highway and Transportation EngineeringUniversity of al MustansiriyahBaghdadIraq
  2. 2.Department of Construction and ProjectsAl-Karkh University of ScienceBaghdadIraq

Personalised recommendations