Advertisement

Supply Chain Framework in Enhancing Construction Waste Management: A Case Study in Klang Valley

  • Raja Nor Husna Raja Mohd NoorEmail author
  • Intan Rohani Endut
  • Ahmad Ruslan Mohd Redzuan
  • Nurol Huda Dahalan
  • Juzailah Nur Yunus
  • Nor Janna Tammy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 53)

Abstract

Construction Waste Management is part of a growing movement towards a sustainable world. The Eleventh Malaysia Plan had played a significant role in the demands of executing major residential housing project developments where it has been observed that construction wastes was one of the priorities among waste streams. The lack in the highlighting of the proper flow of the construction waste process has called for a need to contextualize, explore and document its practice in the construction industry to identify the current existing process of construction waste management, the barriers and the major types and composition of construction waste generated. The aim of this research is to develop the supply chain framework. This aim was achieved through a preliminary study and a case study method which was conducted in the Klang Valley using the qualitative and quantitative methods. First, a semi-structured interview was conducted among 20 contractors (G7) to identify the current existing process for construction waste management. The second method distributed the questionnaires and 60 responses from contractors (G7), clients and consultants were received on the barriers in the construction waste management process. The Third method conducted a survey on the heaps of waste through observation, estimated to identify the main types of construction waste produced. The main conclusions drawn from the findings gathered have produced that the supply chain framework consists of five main stages or process: waste generation, waste collection, waste segregation, waste reusing and recycling; and waste disposal which is directly used in managing the major construction waste produced including wood, metal, steel, bricks, cement and packaging. Each of these processes consists of comprehensive action taken and specific barriers as strategic items in enhancing the managing process of construction waste. With that, the establishment of this supply chain framework could enhance the current existing process in managing construction waste whereby indirectly reducing the amount of construction waste from being directly disposed in landfills through reusing and the recycling process.

Keywords

Supply chain framework Construction waste 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia and Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia for funding of research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrew RTD, Richard TB (2004) Towards improved construction waste minimisation: a need for improved supply chain integration? Emerald Res Reg 22(1):20–29Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beamon BM (1999) Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Inf Manage 12(4):332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Begum RA, Pereira JJ (2008) Environmental problems in Malaysia: a view of contractors’ perception. J Appl Sources 8(22):4230–4233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Begum RA, Siwar C et al (2006) A benefit cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: the case of Malaysia, Resouces. Conserv Recycl 48:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Begum RA, Siwar C, Pereira JJ, Jaafar AH (2007) Implementation of waste management and minimization in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resour Conserv Recycl 321–328:53Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Begum RA, Siwar C, Pereira JJ, Hamid JA (2009) Contractors’ willingness to pay for improving construction waste management in Malaysia. Malays Constr Res J 4(1)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blengini GA (2009) Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: a case study in turin, Italy. Build Environ 44:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheen KS, Chin-Yieh L, Yeow TS, Ashola A, Yahya NHN, Han WS, Yusof MN (2018) A study of construction waste practices in Selangor, planning Malaysia. J Malays Inst Planners 6(2):217–224Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen MC, Ruijs A, Wessler J (2005) Solid waste management on small islands: the case of green island, Taiwan. Resour Conserv Recycl 45:31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coelho AD, Brito J (2008) Construction and demolition waste management in Portugal. In House Publishing, Rotterdam, NertherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Couto JP, Couto AM (2007) Construction sites environment management: establishing measures to mitigate the noise and waste impactGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deng X, Liu G et al (2008) A study of construction and demolition waste management in Hong Kong. In: 4th international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2008 WiCOM’08, 12–14th Oct 2008, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DSM (2008) Massachusetts construction and demolition debris industry study-final report environment servicesGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ekanayake L, Ofori G (2000) Construction material waste source evaluation. Department of Building, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    EPU (2010) Ninth Malaysia Plan, RMK9, Prime Minister. Putrajaya, The Economic Planning Unit (Online). Available from: http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/SpecialCoverage/RMK9/english/Chapter21.pdf
  16. 16.
    Faniran OO, Caban G (1998) Minimizing waste on construction projects sites. J Eng Constr Architec Manage 5(2):182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fatta D, Papadopoulos A et al (2003) Generation and management of construction and demolition waste in greece: an existing challengeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fellows R, Liu A (2008) Research methods for construction. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gavillan RM, Bernold LE (1994) Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction. J Constr Eng Manage 120(3)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Golder Associates (1999) Waste profile study of victorian landfills south bank, Victoria, environment protection authority. Waste Manage Policy UnitGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huong TH, Larsen I (2007) Managing construction waste—the Sarawak experience, Malaysia. Institute of environment and development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jantan MH, Pereira JJ, Midon MS, Zain MZ (2004) Development of wood based products from construction waste. In: Proceedings of the construction industry research achievement seminar (CIRAS)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones S (2007) Highlights of waste control laws and regulations in China, China environment forum’s partnership with Western Kentucky University on the USAID—supported China Environmental Health Protect Fact Sheet. [Online] Available from www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/wastelaw.pdf Accessed 5 January 2012.
  24. 24.
    Jones P, Rubina R (2011) Case study: construction waste minimisation in housing (Online). Available from: www.cardiff.ac.uk/archi/programmes/cost8/case/waste/constructionwaste.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2011
  25. 25.
    Kang XP, Wang JY, Tam VWY (2006) On site sorting of construction waste in Mainland China—a survey made in China. In: The CRIOCM international symposium. Advancement of construction management and real estateGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kartam N, Al-Mutairi N, Al-Ghusain I, Al-Humoud J (2004) Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait. Waste Manag 24:1049–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kofoworola OF, Gheewala SH (2009) Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand. Waste Manage 29:731–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar R (2005) Research methodology-a step by step guide for beginners, 1st edn. SAGE Publication IncGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar S, Malegeant P (2006) Strategic alliance in a closed-loop supply chain, a case of manufacturer and eco-non-profit organization. Technovation 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Lau HH, Whyte A, Lau PL (2008) Composition and characteristics of construction waste generated by residential housing project. Int. J. Environment. Res. 2(3):261–268Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lawson NA, Douglas L (2001) Recycling construction and demolition waste-A UK perspective. Environ Manag Health 12(2):147–157Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mahayuddin SA, Pereira JJ, Badaruzzaman WHW, Mokhtar MB (2008) Construction waste management in a developing country: case study of Ipoh, Malaysia. WIT Trans Ecol Environ, 109Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mahayuddin SA, Joy JP, Badaruzzaman WHW, Mokhtar MB (2010) Construction waste index for waste control in residential housing project. In: Proceeding SB10 Wellington-Innovation and tranformation. Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Manaf LA, Abu MAA, Zukki NIM (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: practices and Challenges. Waste Manage 29:2902–2906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MHLG) (2005) National strategic plan for solid waste management. Available from: http://www.kpkt.gov.my/kpkt/
  37. 37.
    Nittvattananon V, Borongan G (2007) Construction and demolition waste management: current practices in Asia. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable solid waste management, Chennai, India, 97–104Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Noor et al (2017) Quantification of construction waste generated in residential housing projects via heap survey sampling with the method of visual estimation: a case study in Klang and Pulau Pinang. J Eng Appl Sci 12(4):792–796. ISSN 1816-949X. (Medwell Journal)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Noor et al (2018) Major challenges to improve the performance of construction waste management process: a case study in Klang Valley. In: AIP conference proceedings vol 2020, pp 020054.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062680
  40. 40.
    Pereira JJ, Chamsuri S, Jantan MD, Midon MS (2002) Construction waste management-investigating opportunities for waste minimisation and recycling. In: Proceedings of the construction industry research achievement seminar 2002 (CIRAS 2002). Dewan Cemerlang 1, Mines International Exhibition Centre, Construction Industry Development Board MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Poon CS, Ann TW, Ng LH (2001) On-site Sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong. Resour Conserv Recycl 32:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Poon CS, Ann TW, Ng LH (2004) Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong. Constr Manage Econ 22:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Poon CS, Yu ATW, Wong SW, Cheung E (2004) Management of construction waste in public housing projects in Hong Kong. Constr Manage Econ 22:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rahim MHIA, Kasim N, Mohamed I, Zainal R, Sarpin N, Saikah M (2017) Construction waste generation in Malaysia construction industry: illegal dumping activities, IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 271, p 012040 (2017)  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/271/1/012040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schubeler P (1996) Conceptual framework for municipal solid waste management in low-income countries. UNDP/UNCHS/WORLD BANK-UMP SKAT (Swiss Centre for Development Cooperation in Technology and Management)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Seow TW, Mohamad AW (2007) Pengurusan Sisa Pembinaan di Tapak Bina..(online). Available from: http://sssums.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/pengurusan-sisa-pembinaan-di-tapak-bina.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2012
  47. 47.
    Tang HH, Larsen IB (2004). Managing construction waste—a Sarawak experience. DANIDA/Sarawak Government UEMS Project, Natural Resources and Environmental Board (NREB), Sarawak and Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Characterization of building-related construction and demolition debris in the United States. United State, the U.S. environmental protection agency municipal and industrial solid waste division office of solid wasteGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang JY, Kang XP, Tam VY (2008) An investigation of construction waste: an empirical study in Shenzen. J Eng Des Technol 6(3):227–236Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang H, Yuan H, Ye G (2010) Construction and demolition waste management in Hong Kong: practices and challenges. In: 4th international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering (ICBBE), pp 1–4Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wilson OD, Skitmore M, Seydel L (1998) Waste management in the construction industry. In: Proceedings symposium a: materials and technologies for sustainable constructionGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yang J, Mitchell D (2010) Approaches to waste materials management in construction projects. The construction, building and real estate research conference of the royal institution of chartered surveyors, at Dauphine UniversityGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yuan P, Shen L, Wang J (2011) Major obstacles to improving the performance of waste management in China’s construction industry. Facilities 29(5/6):224–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhao W, Rotter S (2008) The current situation of construction and demolition waste management in china. In: 2nd international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering, ICBBE 2008, pp 4747–4750Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raja Nor Husna Raja Mohd Noor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Intan Rohani Endut
    • 2
  • Ahmad Ruslan Mohd Redzuan
    • 2
  • Nurol Huda Dahalan
    • 1
  • Juzailah Nur Yunus
    • 1
  • Nor Janna Tammy
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)Permatang PauhMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)Shah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations