Advertisement

Rethinking the Coping Perspective in the Context of Discrimination: Young Religious Minorities in Turkey

  • Bahar Tanyaş
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

Bahar Tanyaş presents a detailed exploration of religious minority individuals’ responses to discrimination in everyday life. Qualitative interview data with young Christian, Jewish and Alevi Muslim participants in Turkey are used to contest the coping discourse in our understanding of responses to discrimination and conceptualize these responses as situated reactions enforced or mediated by discrimination itself. Tanyaş argues that categories of ‘coping styles’ overlook an invisible but constant necessity, inflicted by discrimination on the minority person, to assess any situation or person to determine which reaction is less damaging in an insulting situation or before an insult occurs. Accordingly, responding to discrimination relies on learning from previous experiences and particularities of challenging encounters which are actively shaped by wider discriminatory and exclusionary discourses and practices in a given society.

References

  1. Benjamin, J. (2017). Beyond Doer and Done To: An Intersubjective View of Thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bion, W. R. (1959). Attacks on Linking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 40, 308–315.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, J. (1996). Burning Acts: Injurious Speech. The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 3(1). Available at http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/roundtable/vol3/iss1/9. Accessed 5 May 2019.
  4. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Lives: The Power of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (2019). Performativity, Precarity, and Sexual Politics. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3). Available at http://www.aibr.org/antropologia/04v03/criticos/040301b.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2019.
  6. Çarkoğlu, A., & Çağin Bilgili, N. (2011). A Precarious Relationship: The Alevi Minority, the Turkish State and the EU. South European Society and Politics, 2, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2010). Internalized Devaluation and Situational Threat. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 395–409). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis Outside the Clinic. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who Needs Identity? In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 3–17). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Jordan, J. C. (2018). Deconstructing Resilience: Why Gender and Power Matter in Responding to Climate Stress in Bangladesh. Climate and Development, 11(2), 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Major, B., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2010). Coping with Bias. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination (pp. 410–425). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mellor, D. (2004). Responses to Racism: A Taxonomy of Coping Styles Used by Aboriginal Australians. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74(1), 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, C. T. (2006). Social Psychological Perspective on Coping with Stressors Related to Stigma. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 21–44). The Claremont symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, C. T., & Kaiser, C. R. (2001). A Theoretical Perspective on Coping with Stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, C. T., & Major, B. (2000). Coping with Stigma and Prejudice. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & G. Hull (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Stigma (pp. 243–272). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Saylan, İ. (2014). The Formation of Citizenship in Turkey. In C. Rodriguez, A. Avalos, H. Yılmaz, & A. I. Planet (Eds.), Turkey’s Democratization Process (pp. 16–42). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Tanyaş, B. (under review). ‘I Was Told That People May Hurt Me’: Discrimination Experiences of Youth with Minority Religious Identities.Google Scholar
  20. Yavuz, H. (2000). Cleansing Islam from the Public Sphere. Journal of International Affairs, 54(1), 21–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahar Tanyaş
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social SciencesBahçeşehir UniversityİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations