Advertisement

The Conflict of Genre: Disciplinary Terminology and Conceptual Overlap in the Context of the Annual Report

  • Marcy Leasum OrwigEmail author
  • Anish Dave
Chapter

Abstract

This article explores the annual report genre in light of what scholars in the field of conflict management might refer to as “intrapersonal conflict” and, alternatively, what scholars in the field of communication might refer to as “cognitive dissonance.” Based on reports published by Ford and Toyota, we use lenses within the fields of rhetorical and communication studies to explore automobile companies’ use of discourse in the annual report, a genre with multiple and diverse stakeholders. Striving to adapt this genre to reflect an awareness of readers’ inner tensions regarding the company, or even to temporarily heighten readers’ doubts concerning, in this case, whether to remain a customer, may, we argue, improve transparency, enhance trust, and in the end strengthen the bond between organization and stakeholder.

Keywords

Conflict transformation Professional communication Technical writing Genre Rhetoric Annual report 

Bibliography

  1. Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. Mcguire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theory of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  2. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Brigg, M. (2008). The new politics of conflict resolution: Responding to difference. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, J., & Russell, F. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229–366.Google Scholar
  5. Ford Motor Company. Annual reports—Ford Motor Co. Ford Motor Company—Stock Information. Available at: http://shareholder.ford.com/investors/financials/annual-reports/default.aspx.
  6. Foss, S. (2009). Rhetorical criticism. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  7. Griffin, G. (2013). Discourse analysis. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Research methods for English studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hartmann, M. (2011). Linking dialogue with power: A two-level model of conflict resolution. Unrest Magazine. Available at: http://activity.scar.gmu.edu/magazine-article/linking-dialogue-power-two-level-model-of-conflict-resolution.
  9. Healey, J. R. (2010). Toyota deaths reported to safety database rise to 37. USA Today. Available at: https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/autos/2010-02-17-toyota17_ST_N.htm.
  10. Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 224–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jasinski, J. (2001). Sourcebook on rhetoric. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Keane, A. (2012). Ford would have shut without auto bailouts, Rattner says. Bloomberg Business. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-10-09/ford-would-have-shut-without-auto-bailouts-rattner-says.
  13. Kiely, E. (2011). Ford Motor Co. Does u-turn on bailouts. FactCheck.Org. Available at: http://www.factcheck.org/2011/09/ford-motor-co-does-u-turn-on-bailouts/.
  14. Lederach, J. (2003). The little book of conflict transformation: Clear articulation of the guiding principles by as pioneer in the field. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.Google Scholar
  15. Levinson, C., Bennett, J., & Barrett, D. (2014, March 19). Toyota to pay $1.2 billion to settle U.S. probe. The Wall Street Journal. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/toyota-to-pay-1-2-billion-to-settle-u-s-probe-1395236550.
  16. Lill, D. J. (Ed.). (2012). Selling: The profession. Antioch, TN: DM Bass Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Morgan, D. (2010, March 2). Poll says 31 percent of Americans believe Toyotas unsafe. Reuters. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-toyota-poll-idUSTRE62121B20100302.
  19. Murshed-e-Jahan, K., Belton, B., & Viswanatahan, K. K. (2014). Communication strategies for managing coastal fisheries conflicts in Bangladesh. Ocean and Coastal Management, 92, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newport, F. (2008, December 9). Americans still not buying into auto bailout. Gallup. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/112993/americans-still-buying-auto-bailout.aspx.
  21. Nordin, S. M., Sivapalan, S., Bhattacharya, E., Hashim, H., Ahmad, W., Fatimah, W., & Abdullah, A. (2014). Organizational communication climate and conflict management: Communications management in an oil and gas company. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1046–1058.Google Scholar
  22. Parker, C. (2015). Practicing conflict resolution and cultural responsiveness within interdisciplinary contexts: A study of community service practitioners. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 32(3), 325–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poole, R. (2016). Good times, bad times: A keyword analysis of letters to shareholders of two fortune 500 banking institutions. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rechtin, M. (2014). What Toyota learned from its recall crisis. Available at: http://edit.autonews.com/article/20140525/OEM11/305269965/&template=print&nocache=1.
  25. Toyota Motor Corporation. Annual report sustainable management report. Toyota Global Site. Available at: http://www.toyota-global.com/investors/ir_library/annual/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of BusinessUniversity of Wisconsin-Eau ClaireEau ClaireUSA
  2. 2.English DepartmentGeorgia Southwestern State UniversityAmericusUSA

Personalised recommendations