Are There Ways That Digital Technologies Break Down Walls of Communication During Conflict? Lessons from Leaders of a Women’s Movement in Egypt

  • Ziaul HaqueEmail author
  • Joseph G. Bock


Effective communication is fundamental in conflict resolution insofar as conflicts often begin after communication among belligerent parties has ended. From Fisher and Ury’s Getting to Yes (1981) to Lederach’s The Moral Imagination (2005), decades-long scholarship in conflict resolution has unearthed various dynamics of negotiation strategies and conflict communication. But the focus by conflict resolution scholars on communication’s behavioral aspects dwarfs inquiry into its structural aspects (debunking myths and facilitating attitudinal change). Owing to the proliferation of mobile-based digital technologies and their uses in social change processes, a new scholarly discourse is slowly emerging which holds that digital technology can highlight the structural aspects of conflict. How does this optimism regarding new communication tools resonate in conflict resolution literature, and what are the transformative impacts, if any, of mobile-based interactive digital technology in shaping structural issues in conflict? Drawing on a case study of HarassMap—a social movement NGO in Egypt focused on changing attitudes toward and preventing gender-based violence—we offer an analytical framework to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the evolving potentials of these digital tools in conflict resolution.


Social media Digital technology Gender-based violence Sexual harassment Conflict communication 


  1. Abbott, J. P. (2011). Cacophony or empowerment? Analyzing the impact of new information communication technologies and new social media in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(4), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhayek, K. (2016). ICTs, agency, and gender in Syrian activists’ work among Syrian refugees in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development, 20(3), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, A., Grönlund, Å., & Wicander, G. (2012). Development as freedom—how the capability approach can be used in ICT4D research and practice. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  4. Armakolas, I., & Maksimovic, M. (2013). ‘Babylution:’ A civic awakening in Bosnia and Herzegovina? Available at:
  5. Bailard, C. S. (2015). Ethnic conflict goes mobile: Mobile technology’s effect on the opportunities and motivations for violent collective action. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock, J. G. (2012). The technology of nonviolence: Social media and violence prevention. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairo University. (2017, July 16). Cairo University organizes anti-harassment and combating violence against women training courses for its employees. Available at:
  10. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Certoma, C., Corsini, F., & Rizzi, F. (2015). Crowdsourcing urban sustainability. Data, people and technologies in participatory governance. Futures, 74, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell, R. (2010). Empowerment as change. Development, 53(2), 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict (Vol. 9). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Coyle, D., & Meier, P. (2009). New technologies in emergencies and conflict: The role of information and social networks. Washington, DC and London, UK: United Nations Foundations, Vodafone Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahmy, A., Abdelmonem, A., Hamdy, E., Badr, A., & Hassan, R. (2014). Towards a safer city[:] Sexual harassment in greater cairo: Effectiveness of crowdsourced data. Available at:
  18. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Frontline. (n.d.). Available at:
  20. Gajjala, R., Zhang, Y., & Dako-Gyeke, P. (2010). Lexicons of women’s empowerment online: Appropriating the other. Feminist Media Studies, 10(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galtung. J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (1953). Character and social structure. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  23. Grove, N. S. (2015). The cartographic ambiguities of HarassMap: Crowdmapping security and sexual violence in Egypt. Security Dialogue, 46(4), 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. HarassMap. (n.d.). Our story. Available at:
  25. Hellström, J., & Karefelt, A. (2012). Participation through mobile phones: A study of SMS use during the Ugandan general elections 2011. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  26. Hoan, N. T., Chib, A., & Mahalingham, R. (2016). Mobile phones and gender empowerment: Enactment of ‘restricted agency.’ In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  27. Hussain, M. M., & Howard, P. N. (2013). What best explains successful protest cascades? ICTs and the fuzzy causes of the Arab Spring. International Studies Review, 15(1), 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jorgic, D. (2013, February 5). Kenya tracks Facebook, Twitter for election ‘hate speech.’ Reuters. Available at: idUSBRE9140IS20130205.
  29. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development & Change, 30(3), 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kellner, D., & Kim, G. (2010). YouTube, critical pedagogy, and media activism. Review of Education, Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 32(1), 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kienle, E. (2012). Egypt without Mubarak, Tunisia after Bin Ali: Theory, history and the ‘Arab Spring’. Economy and Society, 41(4), 532–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history: ‘Kranzberg’s laws’. Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lanzara, G. F. (2009). Building digital institutions: ICT and the rise of assemblages in government. In ICT and innovation in the public sector (pp. 9–48). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larrauri, H. P., & Kahl, A. (2013). Technology for peacebuilding. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  35. Lauer, R. (1977). Perspectives on social change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. Llamazares, M., & Mulloy, K. (2014). Unicef in Uganda: Using technology-based innovations to advance peacebuilding. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 9(3), 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lundis, J. (1974). Sociology: Concepts and characteristics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  38. Maclver, R., & Page, C. (1949). Society: An introductory analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart.Google Scholar
  39. Maiese, M. (n.d.). Summary of the moral imagination: The art and soul of building peace. Beyond Intractability. Available at:
  40. Mancini, F. (Ed.). (2013). New technology and the prevention of violence and conflict. New York: International Peace Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Mancini, F., & O’Reilly, M. (2013). New technology and the prevention of violence and conflict. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
  42. Martin-Shields, C., & Stones, E. (2014). Smart phones and social bonds: Communication technology and inter-ethnic cooperation in Kenya. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 9(3), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masika, R., & Bailur, S. (2015). Negotiating women’s agency through ICTS: A comparative study of Uganda and India. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1), 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitra, S. (2015). Communication and peace: Understanding the nature of texts as a way to resolve conceptual differences in the emerging field. Global Media and Communication, 11(3), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mutekwe, E. (2012). The impact of technology on social change: A sociological perspective. Journal of Research in Peace, Gender and Development, 2(11), 226–238.Google Scholar
  46. Newsom, V. A., & Lengel, L. (2012). Arab women, social media, and the Arab Spring: Applying the framework of digital reflexivity to analyze gender and online activism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 13(4), 31–45.Google Scholar
  47. Peace Innovation Lab at Stanford. (n.d.). About. https://www.peaceinnovation. Available at:
  48. PeaceFactory. (2018). Available at:
  49. Pierskalla, J. H., & Hollenbach, F. M. (2013). Technology and collective action: The effect of cell phone coverage on political violence in Africa. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pruitt, D. G., Rubin, J., & Kim, S. H. (1998). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Puig Larrauri, H. (2013, May 26.) Dragons, UNDP and re-thinking empowerment. Let Them Talk. Available at:
  52. Radsch, C. C., & Khamis, S. (2013). In their own voice: Technologically mediated empowerment and transformation among young Arab women. Feminist Media Studies, 13(5), 881–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramsbotham, O., Miall, H., & Woodhouse, T. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rybas, N., & Gajjala, R. (2007). Developing cyberethnographic research methods for understanding digitally mediated identities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3). Available at:
  55. Search for Common Ground. (n.d.). Communication for peacebuilding: Practices, trends and challenges. Available at:
  56. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Google Scholar
  58. Simon, S. (2011). Using ICTs to explore Moroccan women’s ideas about their emancipation. Gender, Technology and Development, 15(2), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simons, P. (2013, January 25). Harassmap harnesses social media to fight for social change. Edmonton Journal. Available at:
  60. Stauffacher, D. (2005). Information and communication technology for peace: The role of ICT in preventing, responding to and recovering from conflict (Vol. 11). New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Stauffacher, D., Drake, W., Currion, P., & Steinberger, J. (2005). Information and communication technology for peace: The role of ICT in preventing, responding to and recovering from conflict. New York: United Nations ICT Task Force.Google Scholar
  62. Tellidis, I., & Kappler, S. (2016). Information and communication technologies in peacebuilding: Implications, opportunities and challenges. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. The Parents Circle Families Forum. (n.d.). About PCFF. Available at:
  64. UBER. (2015, October 29). Uber teams up with HarassMap to take positive action against sexual harassment. Available at:
  65. Uber, HarassMap Reinforce Partnership to Prevent Sexual Harassment. (2017, November 8). Egypt Independent. Available at:
  66. UNDP. (2008). Action for Cooperation and Trust (Act): Building lasting relationships island wide. Nicosia: UNDP-ACT. Available at: achievements%20report_eng%20%282%29.pdf.
  67. Ushahidi. (2018). Available at:
  68. Writers Guild of America, West (WGAW). (2014, June 29). Annual financial report. Available at: uploadedFiles/who_we_are/annual_reports/annualreport14.pdf.
  69. Vago, S. (1992). Social change. London: Halt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  70. Vinck, P. (2013). Humanitarian technology. In P. Vinck (Ed.), World disasters report: Focus on technology and the future of humanitarian action. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.Google Scholar
  71. Warren, T. C. (2015). Explosive connections? Mass media, social media, and the geography of collective violence in African states. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weidmann, N. B. (2015a). Communication, technology, and political conflict: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weidmann, N. B. (2015b). Communication networks and the transnational spread of ethnic conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Young, C. (2014). HarassMap: Using crowdsourced data to map sexual harassment in Egypt. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(3), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in International Conflict Management, School of Conflict Management, Peacebuilding and DevelopmentKennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA
  2. 2.School of Conflict Management, Peacebuilding and DevelopmentKennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations