Impacts of the Digital Divide on the E-government Portals of Nepal

  • Bhanu Bhakta AcharyaEmail author
Part of the Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series book series (GTMCR)


Several countries have been advancing to develop and enrich e-government platforms to effectively deliver government services to the public. Since the 1970s, Nepal has realized the potentials of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for effective and efficient government service delivery. By introducing several ICT policies and programs, the Government of Nepal seeks to provide government services through e-government platforms and contribute to the national economy by 2030. This chapter assesses the current situation of e-government platforms with regard to their capability and readiness to deliver government services. Employing Layne and Lee's four-stage model of e-government development, this chapter observes the official websites of 22 federal ministries of Nepal, and finds that the digital divide seriously affects Nepal's efforts of government service delivery through digital platforms.


Nepal Digital divide E-government ICT Internet Digital platforms 


  1. Acharya, B. B. (2017). Conceptual Evolution of the Digital Divide: A Systematic Review of the Literature Over a Period of Five Years (2010—2015). World of Media: Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 1, 41–74. Available at:
  2. Anderson, R. H., Bikson, T. K., Law, S. A., & Mitchell, B. M. (1997). Universal Access to E-mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications. Educational Media International, 34(2), 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth, M., & Veit, D. J. (2011, February). How Digital Divide Affects Public E-services: The Role of Migration Background. Paper Presented at the Meeting of Wirtschaftinformatik, Zurich. Available at:
  4. Basyal, D. K., & Seo, J. W. (2016). What Should We Do For E-Government in Nepal and How? An AHPa. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 31(3), 47–74.Google Scholar
  5. Bhattarai, K. (2017). Nepal’s Smart City Dreams. The Republica Daily. Available at:
  6. Bhattarai, K. (2018). Smart City Dreams. The Kathmandu Post. Available at:
  7. Compaine, B. M. (2001). The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Computer Association of Nepal. (2018). About. Available at:
  9. Conteh, C., & Smith, G. (2015). Towards an Interactive E-Government System in Sub-Saharan Africa: Prospects and Challenges. In Public Affairs and Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 213–228). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewan, S., & Riggins, F. J. (2005). The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems, 6(12), 298–337.Google Scholar
  11. Digital Nepal. (2018). Digital Nepal Framework: Unlocking Nepal’s Growth Potential. Available at:
  12. Dixit, A. (2018). Towards Digital Nepal. The Kathmandu Post. Available at:
  13. E-Government Master Plan. (2006). E-Government Master Plan Consulting Report. Government of Nepal and Korea IT Industry Promotion Agency. Retrieved from,
  14. Editorial. (2018). Digital Payments. The Himalayan Times. Available at:
  15. Gautam, B. (2018). Andhyara gaau ujyalo ko parkhaima [Dark villages waiting for lights]. Karobar Daily. Available at:
  16. Haight, M., Quan-Haase, A., & Corbett, B. A. (2014). Revisiting the Digital Divide in Canada: The Impact of Demographic Factors on Access to the Internet, Level of Online Activity, and Social Networking Site Usage. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanafizadeh, M. R., Hanafizadeh, P., & Bohlin, E. (2013). Digital Divide and E-Readiness: Trends and Gaps. International Journal of E-Adoption, 5(3), 30–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harambam, J., Aupers, S., & Houtman, D. (2013). The Contentious Gap: From Digital Divide to Cultural Beliefs About Online Interactions. Information, Communication & Society, 16(7), 1093–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4). Available at:
  20. Hilbert, M. (2011). The End Justifies the Definition: The Manifold Outlooks on the Digital Divide and Their Practical Usefulness for Policy-Making. Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 715–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Himma, K. E. (2007) The Information Gap, the Digital Divide, and the Obligations of Affluent Nations. International Review of Information Ethics 7(09): 1–14.Google Scholar
  22. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang, C. Y., & Chen, H. N. (2010). Global Digital Divide: A Dynamic Analysis Based on the Bass Model. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(2), 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ICT Policy. (2015). National Information and Communication Technology Policy, 2015. Kathmandu: Ministry of Information and Communication. Available at:
  25. IT Policy. (2000). Information Technology Policy-2000. Retrieved from,
  26. IT Policy. (2010). Information Technology Policy-2010. Retrieved from,
  27. Joshi, B. P. (2011). Implementation of E-Government Policy in Nepal: How Far It Is Successful!. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  28. Karan, P., Zuberi, M., Proud, R., & Rose, L. E. (2018). Nepal. The Encyclopaedia Britannica. Available at:
  29. Katz, J. and Aspden, P. (1997) Motivations for and Barriers to Internet Usage: Results of a National Public Opinion Survey. Internet Research 7(3): 170–188.Google Scholar
  30. Koirala, B. (2018). The Internet Penetration in Nepal Has Reached 63%. Available at:
  31. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montgomery, L. (2002). NGOs and the Internet in Nepal. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7(2). Retrieved from,
  33. National Information and Communication Technology Policy. (2015). Ministry of Information and Communication, Government of Nepal. Kathmandu. Retrieved from,
  34. Nepal Telecommunications Authority. (2018). MIS Report (16 December 2017–14 January 2018). Available at:
  35. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Social and Human Capital. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  37. Parajuli, J., & Haynes, K. E. (2017). Broadband and Narrowband Internet in Nepal. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 1(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poudyal, R., Khadka, S. K., & Loskot, P. (2017). Understanding Energy Crisis in Nepal: Assessment of the Country’s Energy Demand and Supply in 2016. In Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON) (pp. 1–4). Thailand: International IEEE.Google Scholar
  39. Ragnedda, M. (2017). The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2015). Digital Divide: Max Weber and Digital Divide Studies—Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 9, 6.Google Scholar
  41. Reddick, C. G., & Turner, M. (2012). Channel Choice and Public Service Delivery in Canada: Comparing E-Government to Traditional Service Delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Regmi, N. (2017). Expectations Versus Reality: A Case of Internet in Nepal. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 82(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roman, A. V. (2013). Delineating Three Dimensions of E-Government Success: Security, Functionality, and Transformation. In J. R. Gill-Garcia (Ed.), E-Government Success Factors and Measures: Theories, Concepts, and Methodologies (pp. 135–157). Hershey: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  44. Rupakhetee, K., & Heshmati, A. (2011). Rhetorics vs. Realities in Implementation of E-Government Master Plan in Nepal. Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program Research Working Paper 2011:75, Seoul.Google Scholar
  45. Shakya, S. (2017). The Beginning of an Era of Stability for Nepal? Forbes: Inside Asia. Available at:
  46. Stoiciu, A. (2011). The Role of E-Governance in Bridging the Digital Divide. UN Chronicle: The Magazine of the United Nations. Available at:
  47. Thapa, D., & Sein, M. K. (2016). Information Ecology as a Holistic Lens to Understand ICTD Initiatives: A Case Study of OLPC Deployment in Nepal. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (p. 27).Google Scholar
  48. THT Online. (2018). New Local Level Structure Comes into Effect from Today. Available at:
  49. UN Survey. (2018). United Nations E-Government Survey. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: Scholar
  50. Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2012). The Evolution of the Digital Divide: The Digital Divide Turns to Inequality of Skills and Usage. In J. Bus, M. Crompton, M. Hildebrandt, & G. Metakides (Eds.), Digital Enlightenment Yearbook (pp. 57–75). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wei, K., Teo, H., Chan, H. C., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2011). Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. World Bank. (2015). What Is E-Government? Available at:
  54. World Bank. (2018). Nepal. Available at:
  55. Yu, L. (2006). Understanding Information Inequality: Making Sense of the Literature of the Information and Digital Divides. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38(4), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations